Wikipedia:Don't be evil: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
punctuation |
|||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
==User essays== |
==User essays== |
||
*[[User:Durova/The dark side]] |
*[[User:Durova/The dark side]] |
||
[[es:Wikipedia:No seas cruel]] |
|||
Revision as of 14:33, 2 September 2009
 | This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
The Wikipedia would work a lot better if people weren't evil.
If people don't vandalise, RC patrollers could work more on expanding the encyclopedia. If people don't get into lame edit wars and don't breach the 3-revert rule, fewer people would be blocked and they would be able to further edit the encyclopedia. If people are civil, everyone will be happier and fewer people would leave the Wikipedia, hence expanding it further. Editors should be mindful that material in Wikipedia can affect people's lives; adding harmful content is not necessary for improving the quality of the encyclopedia.
Remember still to be bold, and when necessary ignore all rules.
Put very simply: Being good, not evil, helps Wikipedia expand.
See also
- Wikipedia:Five pillars
- Meta:Don't be a dick
- Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
- Wikipedia:What Wikipedia Is