Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Delrina: Difference between revisions
m Removed FAC tag, which clearly doesn't belong here |
m Typo fix |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===[[Delrina]]=== |
===[[Delrina]]=== |
||
'''Re-(Self) Nomination'''. A |
'''Re-(Self) Nomination'''. A thorough article on the company best known for having created [[WinFax]]. Has already gone through a [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Delrina|peer review]] and a previous [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Delrina/archive1|FAC round]]. I believe I have taken care of all the outstanding issues with this one: have done a thorough copyedit, re-worded the intro paragraph and added points they may have required further clarification. Have also dug into the corporate reports for the firm (thanks to the local reference library!) and managed to fill in some remaining "holes" information-wise that I found. Found further info on the ''Berkley Systems Inc. v. Delrina'' case, which was about the only contentious item I could find _that was documented_ relating to the history of the company or its products. [[User:Captmondo|Captmondo]] 17:51, 13 December 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:01, 13 December 2005
Re-(Self) Nomination. A thorough article on the company best known for having created WinFax. Has already gone through a peer review and a previous FAC round. I believe I have taken care of all the outstanding issues with this one: have done a thorough copyedit, re-worded the intro paragraph and added points they may have required further clarification. Have also dug into the corporate reports for the firm (thanks to the local reference library!) and managed to fill in some remaining "holes" information-wise that I found. Found further info on the Berkley Systems Inc. v. Delrina case, which was about the only contentious item I could find _that was documented_ relating to the history of the company or its products. Captmondo 17:51, 13 December 2005 (UTC)