User talk:CobraGeek: Difference between revisions
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED |
→Request for additional information: new section |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia{{#if:Clemson Tigers football|, as you did to [[:Clemson Tigers football]]}}. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> [[Special:Contributions/129.252.69.40|129.252.69.40]] ([[User talk:129.252.69.40|talk]]) 14:02, 14 September 2009 (UTC) |
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia{{#if:Clemson Tigers football|, as you did to [[:Clemson Tigers football]]}}. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> [[Special:Contributions/129.252.69.40|129.252.69.40]] ([[User talk:129.252.69.40|talk]]) 14:02, 14 September 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Request for additional information == |
|||
Hello. Regarding your request for protection of the [[Donald Igwebuike]] article, could you clarify a couple of things for me? You stated in [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Donald_Igwebuike&diff=313229672&oldid=269159866 this edit] that the information could only be included if it was properly sourced, but even after sources were provided, you continued to remove it noting that the editors re-adding the info and sources are socks of {{user|ViperNerd}}. Also as a point of reference, [[Wikipedia:Banning policy]] does allow for the wholesale reversion of all edits by ''banned'' editors, however ViperNerd was blocked, not banned. Thanks, — [[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 16:52, 14 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:52, 14 September 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User Page |
Talk Page |
Workshop |
Site Map |
Monobook.js |
Userboxen |
Watchlist |
Contributions |
Happy Thanksgiving
Congrats to you guys today, great win!. It looks like you guys have found a talented young coach in Swinney. I'm thinking he gets the job. Good luck in your bowl game.--Thör hammer 02:21, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Please see my comments in the conclusions section NW (Talk) 21:37, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
RE: Whoops
No problem! :). I was just sitting there after I moved it going "shall I tag it as an unlikely redirect, or should I tag it as a test page? I mean, it's got 'test' in the title, so.." Ironholds (talk) 12:25, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
September 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Donald Igwebuike. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 129.252.69.40 (talk) 14:02, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Clemson Tigers football. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 129.252.69.40 (talk) 14:02, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Request for additional information
Hello. Regarding your request for protection of the Donald Igwebuike article, could you clarify a couple of things for me? You stated in this edit that the information could only be included if it was properly sourced, but even after sources were provided, you continued to remove it noting that the editors re-adding the info and sources are socks of ViperNerd (talk · contribs). Also as a point of reference, Wikipedia:Banning policy does allow for the wholesale reversion of all edits by banned editors, however ViperNerd was blocked, not banned. Thanks, — Kralizec! (talk) 16:52, 14 September 2009 (UTC)