Jack Sheppard (novel): Difference between revisions
Ottava Rima (talk | contribs) |
some links |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''''Jack Sheppard''''' is a novel by [[William Harrison Ainsworth]] serially published in 1839 until 1840. It is a historical romance and a [[Newgate novel]] |
'''''Jack Sheppard''''' is a novel by [[William Harrison Ainsworth]] serially published in 1839 until 1840. It is a [[historical romance]] and a [[Newgate novel]] based on the real life of the 18th century criminal [[Jack Sheppard]]. |
||
==Background== |
==Background== |
||
''Jack Sheppard'' was serially published in ''Bentley's Miscellany'' from January 1839 until February 1840.<ref name="Worth p. 19">Worth 1972 p. 19</ref> The novel was intertwined with the history of [[Charles Dickens]]'s ''[[Oliver Twist]]'' which ran at the same time in ''Bentley's Miscellany''. Dickens, previously a friend of Ainsworth's, became distant from Ainsworth as a controversy brewed over the scandalous nature around both ''Jack Sheppard'', ''Oliver Twist'', and other novels describing criminal life. When the relationship between the two dissolved, Dickens retired from the magazine as its editor and made way for Ainsworth to replace him as editor at the end of 1839.<ref>Carver 2003 p. 20–21</ref> |
''Jack Sheppard'' was serially published in ''[[Bentley's Miscellany]]'' from January 1839 until February 1840.<ref name="Worth p. 19">Worth 1972 p. 19</ref> The novel was intertwined with the history of [[Charles Dickens]]'s ''[[Oliver Twist]]'' which ran at the same time in ''Bentley's Miscellany''. Dickens, previously a friend of Ainsworth's, became distant from Ainsworth as a controversy brewed over the scandalous nature around both ''Jack Sheppard'', ''Oliver Twist'', and other novels describing criminal life. When the relationship between the two dissolved, Dickens retired from the magazine as its editor and made way for Ainsworth to replace him as editor at the end of 1839.<ref>Carver 2003 p. 20–21</ref> |
||
A three volume edition of the work was published by Bentley in October 1839. The novel was adapted to the stage and 8 different theatrical versions were produced in autumn 1839.<ref name="Worth p. 19"/> |
A three volume edition of the work was published by Bentley in October 1839. The novel was adapted to the stage and 8 different theatrical versions were produced in autumn 1839.<ref name="Worth p. 19"/> |
||
==Story== |
==Story== |
||
The story is divided into three parts called "Epochs". The "Jonathan Wild" epoch comes first. The events of the story begins with the notorious criminal and |
The story is divided into three parts called "Epochs". The "Jonathan Wild" epoch comes first. The events of the story begins with the notorious criminal and thief-catcher [[Jonathan Wild]] encouraging Jack Sheppard's father to a life of crime. Wild, who once pursues Sheppard's mother, eventually turns Sheppard's father into the authorities and he is soon after executed. Sheppard's mother is left to raise Sheppard, a mere infant at the time, alone.<ref>Worth 1972 p. 53</ref> |
||
Paralleling these events is the story of Thames Darrell. On |
Paralleling these events is the story of Thames Darrell. On 26 November 1703, the date of the first section, Darrell is removed separated from his immoral uncle, Sir Rowland Trenchard, and is given to Mr. Wood to be raised.<ref name="Worth p. 54"> Worth 1972 p. 54</ref> |
||
The third epoch takes place in 1724 and spans six months. Sheppard is a thief that spends his time robbing various people. While he and Blueskin rob the Wood's household, Blueskin murders Mrs. Woods. This upsets Sheppard and results in his separation from Wild's group. Sheppard befriends Thames again and spends his time trying to correct Blueskin's wrong.<ref name="Worth p. 54"/> |
The third epoch takes place in 1724 and spans six months. Sheppard is a thief that spends his time robbing various people. While he and [[Blueskin Blake|Blueskin]] rob the Wood's household, Blueskin murders Mrs. Woods. This upsets Sheppard and results in his separation from Wild's group. Sheppard befriends Thames again and spends his time trying to correct Blueskin's wrong.<ref name="Worth p. 54"/> |
||
===Characters=== |
===Characters=== |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
Ainsworth's two novels ''Rookwood'' and ''Jack Sheppard'' were fundamental in popularizing the "rogue novel" or "[[Newgate novel]]" tradition, a combination of the historical and Gothic novel traditions. The tradition itself stems from a literary tradition from the Renaissance of emphasizing the actions of well-known criminals.<ref>Worth 1972 p. 34</ref> Ainsworth's ''Jack Sheppard'' is connected to another work within the same tradition that ran alongside of it for many months in the ''Bentley's Miscellany'': Dickens's ''Oliver Twist''. Their plots are similar as both deal with an individual attempting to corrupt a boy, but Ainsworth's boy is corrupted whereas Dickens's is not. Both authors also cast Jews as their villains that are similar in appearance but Ainsworth's is less powerful.<ref name="Worth p. 37">Worth 1972 p. 37</ref> |
Ainsworth's two novels ''Rookwood'' and ''Jack Sheppard'' were fundamental in popularizing the "rogue novel" or "[[Newgate novel]]" tradition, a combination of the historical and Gothic novel traditions. The tradition itself stems from a literary tradition from the Renaissance of emphasizing the actions of well-known criminals.<ref>Worth 1972 p. 34</ref> Ainsworth's ''Jack Sheppard'' is connected to another work within the same tradition that ran alongside of it for many months in the ''Bentley's Miscellany'': Dickens's ''Oliver Twist''. Their plots are similar as both deal with an individual attempting to corrupt a boy, but Ainsworth's boy is corrupted whereas Dickens's is not. Both authors also cast Jews as their villains that are similar in appearance but Ainsworth's is less powerful.<ref name="Worth p. 37">Worth 1972 p. 37</ref> |
||
According to Frank Chandler, the novel "was intended as a study in the Spanish style".<ref>Chandler 1907 p. 366</ref> Such influences appear in Jack's physical description and in the words of the characters, including John Gay who states that his life is related to the stories of Guzman d'Alfarache, Lazarillo de Tormes, Estevanillo Gonzalez, Meriton Latroon, and other Spanish rogues. However, there are differences between him and the Spanish characters. His personality is different, especially in the constant alternation of him being described as malicious and heroic. He is also less sympathetic than his Spanish counterparts until Wild is introduced into the work, which he is seen more favorably. The feud between Wild and Sheppard result in Sheppard giving up his roguish ways. When Sheppard is executed, his character has gained the status of martyr.<ref> Chandler 1907 pp. 366–368</ref> |
According to [[Frank Chandler]], the novel "was intended as a study in the Spanish style".<ref>Chandler 1907 p. 366</ref> Such influences appear in Jack's physical description and in the words of the characters, including [[John Gay]] who states that his life is related to the stories of [[Guzman d'Alfarache]], [[Lazarillo de Tormes]], [[Estevanillo Gonzalez]], [[Meriton Latroon]], and other Spanish rogues. However, there are differences between him and the Spanish characters. His personality is different, especially in the constant alternation of him being described as malicious and heroic. He is also less sympathetic than his Spanish counterparts until Wild is introduced into the work, which he is seen more favorably. The feud between Wild and Sheppard result in Sheppard giving up his roguish ways. When Sheppard is executed, his character has gained the status of martyr.<ref> Chandler 1907 pp. 366–368</ref> |
||
The novel depicts Wild as vicious and cruel, a character that wants to control the London underworld along with a desire to destroy Sheppard. Wild is not focused just on the novel's main character, but finds an enemy in anyone that is feels is no longer useful to him. This is particularly true of Sir Rowland Trenchard, who Wild has murdered in a horrific manner. In addition to these actions, Wild is said to have kept a trophy case of items representing cruelty, including the skull of Sheppard's father. The cruel nature of Wild and his grotesque murders were more than what Ainsworth's contemporaries would depict in their novels.<ref>Worth 1972 pp. 77–79</ref> As counter to Wild, Sheppard is a character that no matter how bad or depraved he acts, he is still good. He suffers from anguish in relation to his action which continues until the very moment of his death at Tyburn. This is not to suggest that his character is free from problems, but he is depicted only as a thief and not a worse type of criminal.<ref>Worth 1972 p. 96</ref> |
The novel depicts Wild as vicious and cruel, a character that wants to control the London underworld along with a desire to destroy Sheppard. Wild is not focused just on the novel's main character, but finds an enemy in anyone that is feels is no longer useful to him. This is particularly true of Sir Rowland Trenchard, who Wild has murdered in a horrific manner. In addition to these actions, Wild is said to have kept a trophy case of items representing cruelty, including the skull of Sheppard's father. The cruel nature of Wild and his grotesque murders were more than what Ainsworth's contemporaries would depict in their novels.<ref>Worth 1972 pp. 77–79</ref> As counter to Wild, Sheppard is a character that no matter how bad or depraved he acts, he is still good. He suffers from anguish in relation to his action which continues until the very moment of his death at [[Tyburn]]. This is not to suggest that his character is free from problems, but he is depicted only as a thief and not a worse type of criminal.<ref>Worth 1972 p. 96</ref> |
||
Morality and moral lessons do play a part within ''Jack Sheppard''. For instance, the second epoch begins with a reflection on the passing of twelve years and how people changed over that length of time.<ref>Worth 1972 pp. 109–110</ref> In particular, the narrator asks, "Where are the dreams of ambition in which, twelve years ago, we indulged? Where are the aspirations that fired us—the passions that consumed us then? Has our success in life been commensurate with our own desires—with the anticipations formed of us by others? Or, are we not blighted in heart, as in ambition? Has not the loved one been estranged by doubt, or snatched from us by the cold hand of death? Is not the goal, towards which we pressed, farther off than ever,—the prospect before us cheerless as the blank behind?"<ref>Worth 1972 qtd. p. 110</ref> |
Morality and moral lessons do play a part within ''Jack Sheppard''. For instance, the second epoch begins with a reflection on the passing of twelve years and how people changed over that length of time.<ref>Worth 1972 pp. 109–110</ref> In particular, the narrator asks, "Where are the dreams of ambition in which, twelve years ago, we indulged? Where are the aspirations that fired us—the passions that consumed us then? Has our success in life been commensurate with our own desires—with the anticipations formed of us by others? Or, are we not blighted in heart, as in ambition? Has not the loved one been estranged by doubt, or snatched from us by the cold hand of death? Is not the goal, towards which we pressed, farther off than ever,—the prospect before us cheerless as the blank behind?"<ref>Worth 1972 qtd. p. 110</ref> |
||
==Sources== |
==Sources== |
||
Jack Sheppard was a well known criminal in |
Jack Sheppard was a well known criminal in 18th century London. In terms of the Newgate tradition, those like [[Daniel Defoe]] included references to Jack Sheppard in their works. Other figures, including [[William Hogarth]], appear within the work because of their connection to the Newgate tradition. Hogarth is particularly involved because of his "[[Industry and Idleness]]" (1747), a series of illustrations that depict the London underworld.<ref>Worth 1972 p. 35</ref> Sheppard's rival, Jonathan Wild, also a real criminal, is based on the same character that was used in fiction during the 18th-century, including [[Henry Fielding]] in his ''[[The Life and Death of Jonathan Wild, the Great]]''.<ref name="Worth p. 37"/> |
||
In terms of knowledge of his subject matter and the criminal underworld, Ainsworth did not have any direct knowledge or experience.<ref>Carver 2003 p. 9</ref> He admitted in 1878 that he "Never had anything to do with scoundrels in my life. I got my slang in a much easier way. I picked up the Memoirs of one James Hard Vaux a returned transport. The book was full of adventures, and had at the end a kind of slang dictionary. Out of this I got all of my 'patter'."<ref>Yates 27 March 1878</ref> |
In terms of knowledge of his subject matter and the criminal underworld, Ainsworth did not have any direct knowledge or experience.<ref>Carver 2003 p. 9</ref> He admitted in 1878 that he "Never had anything to do with scoundrels in my life. I got my slang in a much easier way. I picked up the Memoirs of one James Hard Vaux a returned transport. The book was full of adventures, and had at the end a kind of slang dictionary. Out of this I got all of my 'patter'."<ref>Yates 27 March 1878</ref> |
||
==Response== |
==Response== |
||
With its publication, Ainsworth told James Crossley in an 8 October 1839 letter, "The success of Jack is pretty certain, they are bringing him out at half the theatres in London."<ref>Carver 2003 qtd. p. 7</ref> He was correct and ''Jack Sheppard'' was a popular success and sold more books than Ainsworth's previous novels ''Rookwood'' and ''Crichton''. While it spawned many imitations and parodies of the novel, it also, according to George Worth, "aroused a very different response: a vigorous outcry concerning its alleged glorification of crime and immorality and the baneful effect which it was bound to have on the young and impressionable."<ref name="Worth p. 19"/> One such outcry came from [[Mary Russell Mitford]] that claimed after the novel's publication that "all the Chartists in the land are less dangerous than this nightmare of a book".<ref>Ellis 1979 Vol. 1 qtd. p. 376</ref> |
With its publication, Ainsworth told James Crossley in an 8 October 1839 letter, "The success of Jack is pretty certain, they are bringing him out at half the theatres in London."<ref>Carver 2003 qtd. p. 7</ref> He was correct and ''Jack Sheppard'' was a popular success and sold more books than Ainsworth's previous novels ''Rookwood'' and ''[[Crichton (novel)|Crichton]]''. While it spawned many imitations and parodies of the novel, it also, according to George Worth, "aroused a very different response: a vigorous outcry concerning its alleged glorification of crime and immorality and the baneful effect which it was bound to have on the young and impressionable."<ref name="Worth p. 19"/> One such outcry came from [[Mary Russell Mitford]] that claimed after the novel's publication that "all the Chartists in the land are less dangerous than this nightmare of a book".<ref>Ellis 1979 Vol. 1 qtd. p. 376</ref> |
||
In the 1841 ''Chronicles of Crime'', Camden Pelham claimed in regards to influence of ''Jack Sheppard'': "The rage for housebreakers has become immense, and the fortunes of the most notorious and the most successful of thieves have been made the subject of entertainments at no fewer than six of the London theatres."<ref>Pelham 1841 p. 50</ref> The negative response against ''Jack Sheppard'' heightened when the novel was blamed for inspiring the murder of William Russell.<ref>Hollingsworth 1963 p. 145</ref> |
In the 1841 ''Chronicles of Crime'', Camden Pelham claimed in regards to influence of ''Jack Sheppard'': "The rage for housebreakers has become immense, and the fortunes of the most notorious and the most successful of thieves have been made the subject of entertainments at no fewer than six of the London theatres."<ref>Pelham 1841 p. 50</ref> The negative response against ''Jack Sheppard'' heightened when the novel was blamed for inspiring the murder of William Russell.<ref>Hollingsworth 1963 p. 145</ref> |
||
During the outcry, ''Jack Sheppard'' was able to become more popular than Dickens's ''Oliver Twist''. This may have prompted Dickens's friend, [[John Forster (biographer)|John Forster]], to review the work harshly in the ''[[Examiner]]'' following its publication.<ref name="Worth p. 37"/> Also, Dickens wanted to separate himself from Ainsworth and Ainsworth's writing, especially that found in the Newgate tradition.<ref>Carver 2003 p. 22</ref> In a February 1840 letter to Richard Horne, he wrote: |
During the outcry, ''Jack Sheppard'' was able to become more popular than Dickens's ''Oliver Twist''. This may have prompted Dickens's friend, [[John Forster (biographer)|John Forster]], to review the work harshly in the ''[[Examiner]]'' following its publication.<ref name="Worth p. 37"/> Also, Dickens wanted to separate himself from Ainsworth and Ainsworth's writing, especially that found in the Newgate tradition.<ref>Carver 2003 p. 22</ref> In a February 1840 letter to [[Richard Hengist Horne]], he wrote: |
||
<blockquote>I am by some jolter-headed enemies most unjustly and untruly charged with having written a book after Mr. Ainsworth's fashion. Unto these jolter-heads and their intensely concentrated humbug, I shall take an early opportunity of temperately replying. If this opportunity had presented itself and I had made this vindication, I could have no objection to set my hand to what I know to be true concerning the late lamented John Sheppard, but I feel a great repugnance to do so now, lest it should seem an ungenerous and unmanly way of disavowing any sympathy with that school, and a means of shielding myself.<ref>Dickens 1969 p. 20</ref></blockquote> |
<blockquote>I am by some jolter-headed enemies most unjustly and untruly charged with having written a book after Mr. Ainsworth's fashion. Unto these jolter-heads and their intensely concentrated humbug, I shall take an early opportunity of temperately replying. If this opportunity had presented itself and I had made this vindication, I could have no objection to set my hand to what I know to be true concerning the late lamented John Sheppard, but I feel a great repugnance to do so now, lest it should seem an ungenerous and unmanly way of disavowing any sympathy with that school, and a means of shielding myself.<ref>Dickens 1969 p. 20</ref></blockquote> |
||
In 1844, Horne wrote that ''Jack Sheppard'' "was full of unredeemed crimes, but being told without any offensive language, did its evil work of popularity, and has now gone to its cradle in the cross-roads of literature, and should be henceforth hushed up by all who have — as so many have —a personal regard for its author."<ref>Horne 1844 p. 14</ref> |
In 1844, Horne wrote that ''Jack Sheppard'' "was full of unredeemed crimes, but being told without any offensive language, did its evil work of popularity, and has now gone to its cradle in the cross-roads of literature, and should be henceforth hushed up by all who have — as so many have —a personal regard for its author."<ref>Horne 1844 p. 14</ref> |
||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
Great men have been among us — names that lend A lustre to our calling — better none: Maclaine, Duval, Dick Turpin, Barrington, Blueskin and others who called Sheppard friend.<ref>Martin and Aytoun 1841 pp. 215–223</ref></blockquote> |
Great men have been among us — names that lend A lustre to our calling — better none: Maclaine, Duval, Dick Turpin, Barrington, Blueskin and others who called Sheppard friend.<ref>Martin and Aytoun 1841 pp. 215–223</ref></blockquote> |
||
Charles Mackay, in 1851, re-evaluated the 1841 negative response of the novel and determined that the novel did negatively affect people: "Since the publication of the first edition of this volume, Jack Sheppard's adventures have been revived. A novel upon the real or fabulous history of the burglar has afforded, by its extraordinary popularity, a further exemplification of the allegations int he text."<ref>Mackay 1995 p. 636</ref> In particular, Mackay declares, "The Inspector's ''Report on Juvenile Delinquency at Liverpool'' contains much matter of the same kind; but sufficient has been already quoted to shew the injurious effects of the deification of great thieves by thoughtless novelists."<ref>Mackay 1995 p. 367</ref> Stephen Carver, in 2003, mentions that "it should be noted that it was the theatrical adaptations consumed by the new urban working class that were considered the social problem [...] What is apparent again and again, as one reconstructs the critical annihilation of Ainsworth, is that the bourgeois establishment neither forgave nor forgot."<ref>Carver 2003 p. 19</ref> Furthermore, Carver as argues, "The Newgate controversy invades the textual surface like a virus. After this, the critic has ''carte blanche'' to say anything, however vicious, ill-informed or downright libellous."<ref>Carver 2003 p. 30</ref> |
[[Charles Mackay]], in 1851, re-evaluated the 1841 negative response of the novel and determined that the novel did negatively affect people: "Since the publication of the first edition of this volume, Jack Sheppard's adventures have been revived. A novel upon the real or fabulous history of the burglar has afforded, by its extraordinary popularity, a further exemplification of the allegations int he text."<ref>Mackay 1995 p. 636</ref> In particular, Mackay declares, "The Inspector's ''Report on Juvenile Delinquency at Liverpool'' contains much matter of the same kind; but sufficient has been already quoted to shew the injurious effects of the deification of great thieves by thoughtless novelists."<ref>Mackay 1995 p. 367</ref> Stephen Carver, in 2003, mentions that "it should be noted that it was the theatrical adaptations consumed by the new urban working class that were considered the social problem [...] What is apparent again and again, as one reconstructs the critical annihilation of Ainsworth, is that the bourgeois establishment neither forgave nor forgot."<ref>Carver 2003 p. 19</ref> Furthermore, Carver as argues, "The Newgate controversy invades the textual surface like a virus. After this, the critic has ''carte blanche'' to say anything, however vicious, ill-informed or downright libellous."<ref>Carver 2003 p. 30</ref> |
||
At the turn of the 20th-century, Chandler points out that the "forces of literature rose in revolt" against the novel.<ref>Chandler 1907 p. 358</ref> Later, Keith Hollingsworth declared Ainsworth's novel as "the high point of the Newgate novel as entertainment".<ref>Hollingsworth 1963 p. 132</ref> Carver argues, "Had he not abandoned the form that he had effectively originated but rather moderated the moral message to suit the times as Dickens had done, Ainsworth would have likely remained at the cutting edge of Victorian literature for a little while longer."<ref>Carver 2003 pp. 19–20</ref> |
At the turn of the 20th-century, Chandler points out that the "forces of literature rose in revolt" against the novel.<ref>Chandler 1907 p. 358</ref> Later, Keith Hollingsworth declared Ainsworth's novel as "the high point of the Newgate novel as entertainment".<ref>Hollingsworth 1963 p. 132</ref> Carver argues, "Had he not abandoned the form that he had effectively originated but rather moderated the moral message to suit the times as Dickens had done, Ainsworth would have likely remained at the cutting edge of Victorian literature for a little while longer."<ref>Carver 2003 pp. 19–20</ref> |
Revision as of 19:11, 18 September 2009
Jack Sheppard is a novel by William Harrison Ainsworth serially published in 1839 until 1840. It is a historical romance and a Newgate novel based on the real life of the 18th century criminal Jack Sheppard.
Background
Jack Sheppard was serially published in Bentley's Miscellany from January 1839 until February 1840.[1] The novel was intertwined with the history of Charles Dickens's Oliver Twist which ran at the same time in Bentley's Miscellany. Dickens, previously a friend of Ainsworth's, became distant from Ainsworth as a controversy brewed over the scandalous nature around both Jack Sheppard, Oliver Twist, and other novels describing criminal life. When the relationship between the two dissolved, Dickens retired from the magazine as its editor and made way for Ainsworth to replace him as editor at the end of 1839.[2]
A three volume edition of the work was published by Bentley in October 1839. The novel was adapted to the stage and 8 different theatrical versions were produced in autumn 1839.[1]
Story
The story is divided into three parts called "Epochs". The "Jonathan Wild" epoch comes first. The events of the story begins with the notorious criminal and thief-catcher Jonathan Wild encouraging Jack Sheppard's father to a life of crime. Wild, who once pursues Sheppard's mother, eventually turns Sheppard's father into the authorities and he is soon after executed. Sheppard's mother is left to raise Sheppard, a mere infant at the time, alone.[3]
Paralleling these events is the story of Thames Darrell. On 26 November 1703, the date of the first section, Darrell is removed separated from his immoral uncle, Sir Rowland Trenchard, and is given to Mr. Wood to be raised.[4]
The third epoch takes place in 1724 and spans six months. Sheppard is a thief that spends his time robbing various people. While he and Blueskin rob the Wood's household, Blueskin murders Mrs. Woods. This upsets Sheppard and results in his separation from Wild's group. Sheppard befriends Thames again and spends his time trying to correct Blueskin's wrong.[4]
Characters
- Jack Sheppard
- Jonathan Wild
- Thames Darrell
- Mr. Wood
- Mrs. Wood
- Winifred Wood
- Blueskin - Joseph Blake
- Thomas Sheppard
Illustrations
Themes
Ainsworth's two novels Rookwood and Jack Sheppard were fundamental in popularizing the "rogue novel" or "Newgate novel" tradition, a combination of the historical and Gothic novel traditions. The tradition itself stems from a literary tradition from the Renaissance of emphasizing the actions of well-known criminals.[5] Ainsworth's Jack Sheppard is connected to another work within the same tradition that ran alongside of it for many months in the Bentley's Miscellany: Dickens's Oliver Twist. Their plots are similar as both deal with an individual attempting to corrupt a boy, but Ainsworth's boy is corrupted whereas Dickens's is not. Both authors also cast Jews as their villains that are similar in appearance but Ainsworth's is less powerful.[6]
According to Frank Chandler, the novel "was intended as a study in the Spanish style".[7] Such influences appear in Jack's physical description and in the words of the characters, including John Gay who states that his life is related to the stories of Guzman d'Alfarache, Lazarillo de Tormes, Estevanillo Gonzalez, Meriton Latroon, and other Spanish rogues. However, there are differences between him and the Spanish characters. His personality is different, especially in the constant alternation of him being described as malicious and heroic. He is also less sympathetic than his Spanish counterparts until Wild is introduced into the work, which he is seen more favorably. The feud between Wild and Sheppard result in Sheppard giving up his roguish ways. When Sheppard is executed, his character has gained the status of martyr.[8]
The novel depicts Wild as vicious and cruel, a character that wants to control the London underworld along with a desire to destroy Sheppard. Wild is not focused just on the novel's main character, but finds an enemy in anyone that is feels is no longer useful to him. This is particularly true of Sir Rowland Trenchard, who Wild has murdered in a horrific manner. In addition to these actions, Wild is said to have kept a trophy case of items representing cruelty, including the skull of Sheppard's father. The cruel nature of Wild and his grotesque murders were more than what Ainsworth's contemporaries would depict in their novels.[9] As counter to Wild, Sheppard is a character that no matter how bad or depraved he acts, he is still good. He suffers from anguish in relation to his action which continues until the very moment of his death at Tyburn. This is not to suggest that his character is free from problems, but he is depicted only as a thief and not a worse type of criminal.[10]
Morality and moral lessons do play a part within Jack Sheppard. For instance, the second epoch begins with a reflection on the passing of twelve years and how people changed over that length of time.[11] In particular, the narrator asks, "Where are the dreams of ambition in which, twelve years ago, we indulged? Where are the aspirations that fired us—the passions that consumed us then? Has our success in life been commensurate with our own desires—with the anticipations formed of us by others? Or, are we not blighted in heart, as in ambition? Has not the loved one been estranged by doubt, or snatched from us by the cold hand of death? Is not the goal, towards which we pressed, farther off than ever,—the prospect before us cheerless as the blank behind?"[12]
Sources
Jack Sheppard was a well known criminal in 18th century London. In terms of the Newgate tradition, those like Daniel Defoe included references to Jack Sheppard in their works. Other figures, including William Hogarth, appear within the work because of their connection to the Newgate tradition. Hogarth is particularly involved because of his "Industry and Idleness" (1747), a series of illustrations that depict the London underworld.[13] Sheppard's rival, Jonathan Wild, also a real criminal, is based on the same character that was used in fiction during the 18th-century, including Henry Fielding in his The Life and Death of Jonathan Wild, the Great.[6]
In terms of knowledge of his subject matter and the criminal underworld, Ainsworth did not have any direct knowledge or experience.[14] He admitted in 1878 that he "Never had anything to do with scoundrels in my life. I got my slang in a much easier way. I picked up the Memoirs of one James Hard Vaux a returned transport. The book was full of adventures, and had at the end a kind of slang dictionary. Out of this I got all of my 'patter'."[15]
Response
With its publication, Ainsworth told James Crossley in an 8 October 1839 letter, "The success of Jack is pretty certain, they are bringing him out at half the theatres in London."[16] He was correct and Jack Sheppard was a popular success and sold more books than Ainsworth's previous novels Rookwood and Crichton. While it spawned many imitations and parodies of the novel, it also, according to George Worth, "aroused a very different response: a vigorous outcry concerning its alleged glorification of crime and immorality and the baneful effect which it was bound to have on the young and impressionable."[1] One such outcry came from Mary Russell Mitford that claimed after the novel's publication that "all the Chartists in the land are less dangerous than this nightmare of a book".[17]
In the 1841 Chronicles of Crime, Camden Pelham claimed in regards to influence of Jack Sheppard: "The rage for housebreakers has become immense, and the fortunes of the most notorious and the most successful of thieves have been made the subject of entertainments at no fewer than six of the London theatres."[18] The negative response against Jack Sheppard heightened when the novel was blamed for inspiring the murder of William Russell.[19]
During the outcry, Jack Sheppard was able to become more popular than Dickens's Oliver Twist. This may have prompted Dickens's friend, John Forster, to review the work harshly in the Examiner following its publication.[6] Also, Dickens wanted to separate himself from Ainsworth and Ainsworth's writing, especially that found in the Newgate tradition.[20] In a February 1840 letter to Richard Hengist Horne, he wrote:
I am by some jolter-headed enemies most unjustly and untruly charged with having written a book after Mr. Ainsworth's fashion. Unto these jolter-heads and their intensely concentrated humbug, I shall take an early opportunity of temperately replying. If this opportunity had presented itself and I had made this vindication, I could have no objection to set my hand to what I know to be true concerning the late lamented John Sheppard, but I feel a great repugnance to do so now, lest it should seem an ungenerous and unmanly way of disavowing any sympathy with that school, and a means of shielding myself.[21]
In 1844, Horne wrote that Jack Sheppard "was full of unredeemed crimes, but being told without any offensive language, did its evil work of popularity, and has now gone to its cradle in the cross-roads of literature, and should be henceforth hushed up by all who have — as so many have —a personal regard for its author."[22]
There were many negative responses from other literary figures, including Edgar Allan Poe who wrote in a March 1841 review, "Such libels on humanity, such provocations to crime, such worthless, inane, disgraceful romances as 'Jack Sheppard' and its successors, are a blot on our literature and a curse to our land."[23] Also, William Makepeace Thackeray was a harsh critic of the Newgate novel tradition and expressed his views through parodying aspects of Jack Sheppard in his novel Vanity Fair.[24] Other influences of the novel appear in Bon Gaultier Ballads, especially when they stated:
Turpin, thou should'st be living at this hour: England hath need of thee. Great men have been among us — names that lend A lustre to our calling — better none: Maclaine, Duval, Dick Turpin, Barrington, Blueskin and others who called Sheppard friend.[25]
Charles Mackay, in 1851, re-evaluated the 1841 negative response of the novel and determined that the novel did negatively affect people: "Since the publication of the first edition of this volume, Jack Sheppard's adventures have been revived. A novel upon the real or fabulous history of the burglar has afforded, by its extraordinary popularity, a further exemplification of the allegations int he text."[26] In particular, Mackay declares, "The Inspector's Report on Juvenile Delinquency at Liverpool contains much matter of the same kind; but sufficient has been already quoted to shew the injurious effects of the deification of great thieves by thoughtless novelists."[27] Stephen Carver, in 2003, mentions that "it should be noted that it was the theatrical adaptations consumed by the new urban working class that were considered the social problem [...] What is apparent again and again, as one reconstructs the critical annihilation of Ainsworth, is that the bourgeois establishment neither forgave nor forgot."[28] Furthermore, Carver as argues, "The Newgate controversy invades the textual surface like a virus. After this, the critic has carte blanche to say anything, however vicious, ill-informed or downright libellous."[29]
At the turn of the 20th-century, Chandler points out that the "forces of literature rose in revolt" against the novel.[30] Later, Keith Hollingsworth declared Ainsworth's novel as "the high point of the Newgate novel as entertainment".[31] Carver argues, "Had he not abandoned the form that he had effectively originated but rather moderated the moral message to suit the times as Dickens had done, Ainsworth would have likely remained at the cutting edge of Victorian literature for a little while longer."[32]
Notes
- ^ a b c Worth 1972 p. 19
- ^ Carver 2003 p. 20–21
- ^ Worth 1972 p. 53
- ^ a b Worth 1972 p. 54
- ^ Worth 1972 p. 34
- ^ a b c Worth 1972 p. 37
- ^ Chandler 1907 p. 366
- ^ Chandler 1907 pp. 366–368
- ^ Worth 1972 pp. 77–79
- ^ Worth 1972 p. 96
- ^ Worth 1972 pp. 109–110
- ^ Worth 1972 qtd. p. 110
- ^ Worth 1972 p. 35
- ^ Carver 2003 p. 9
- ^ Yates 27 March 1878
- ^ Carver 2003 qtd. p. 7
- ^ Ellis 1979 Vol. 1 qtd. p. 376
- ^ Pelham 1841 p. 50
- ^ Hollingsworth 1963 p. 145
- ^ Carver 2003 p. 22
- ^ Dickens 1969 p. 20
- ^ Horne 1844 p. 14
- ^ Poe 1987 p. 371
- ^ Worth 1972 pp. 38–39
- ^ Martin and Aytoun 1841 pp. 215–223
- ^ Mackay 1995 p. 636
- ^ Mackay 1995 p. 367
- ^ Carver 2003 p. 19
- ^ Carver 2003 p. 30
- ^ Chandler 1907 p. 358
- ^ Hollingsworth 1963 p. 132
- ^ Carver 2003 pp. 19–20
References
- Ainsworth, William Harrison. Jack Sheppard]. Paris: Galignani and Company, 1840.
- Carver, Stephen. The Life and Works of the Lancashire Novelist William Harrison Ainsworth, 1805–1882. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press, 2003.
- Chandler, Frank. The Literature of Roguery. New York: Houghton Mifflin and Company, 1907.
- Dickens, Charles. The Letters of Charles Dickens. Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969.
- Ellis, S. M. William Harrison Ainsworth and His Friends. 2 Vols. London: Garland Publishing, 1979.
- Hollingsworth, Keith. The Newgate Novel. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1963.
- Horne, Richard Hengist. A New Spirit of the Age. London: Smith, Elder and Company, 1844.
- Mackay, Charles. Memoirs of Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds. London: Wordsworth, 1995.
- Martin, Theodore and Aytoun, William (pseu. Bon Gaultier). "Illustrations of the Thieves' Literature — No. 1, Flowers of Hemp, or, the Newgate Garland". Tait's Edinburgh Magazine (April 1841): 215–223.
- Pelham, Camden. Chronicles of Crime, Vol I. London: Tegg et al., 1841.
- Poe, Edgar Allan. The Science Fiction of Edgar Allan Poe. London: Penguin, 1987.
- Worth, George. William Harrison Ainsworth. New York: Twayne Publishers, 1972.
- Yates, Edmund. "Celebrities at Home. No. LXXXXIV. Mr. W. Harrison Ainsworth at Little Rockley". The World (27 March 1878).