Jump to content

User talk:68.52.42.38: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
Removal of comments, warnings
Removal of comments, warnings
'''Policy does not prohibit users, including both registered and anonymous users, from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred. The removal of a warning is taken as evidence that the warning has been read by the user. Deleted warnings can still be found in the page history. Repeatedly restoring warnings does nothing but antagonize users, and can encourage further disruption; removal of template warnings is rarely an urgent or important matter, and it is often best to simply let the matter rest if other disruption stops.'''
'''Policy does not prohibit users, including both registered and anonymous users, from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred. The removal of a warning is taken as evidence that the warning has been read by the user. Deleted warnings can still be found in the page history. Repeatedly restoring warnings does nothing but antagonize users, and can encourage further disruption; removal of template warnings is rarely an urgent or important matter, and it is often best to simply let the matter rest if other disruption stops.'''
Important exceptions include declined unblock requests and confirmed sockpuppetry notices ('''''while blocks are still in effect'''''), as well as miscellany for deletion tags (while the discussion is in progress) or, '''for anonymous editors, shared IP header templates'''([[left this--The Whois]]). These notices and templates are necessary in order to keep a user from gaming the system. Such templates are intended not only to communicate with the user in question, but to share important information about e.g. blocks and sockpuppetry with other users.
Important exceptions include declined unblock requests and confirmed sockpuppetry notices ('''''while blocks are still in effect'''''), as well as miscellany for deletion tags (while the discussion is in progress) or, '''for anonymous editors, shared IP header templates'''(''left this--The Whois''). These notices and templates are necessary in order to keep a user from gaming the system. Such templates are intended not only to communicate with the user in question, but to share important information about e.g. blocks and sockpuppetry with other users.




'''''[[Per the above please LEAVE ME ALONE. I'm not vandalizing anything anymore!]]'''''
'''''Per the above please LEAVE ME ALONE. I'm not vandalizing anything anymore!'''''

Revision as of 02:51, 20 September 2009

Talk page is in compliance with WP:Blanking as follows:

Removal of comments, warnings Policy does not prohibit users, including both registered and anonymous users, from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred. The removal of a warning is taken as evidence that the warning has been read by the user. Deleted warnings can still be found in the page history. Repeatedly restoring warnings does nothing but antagonize users, and can encourage further disruption; removal of template warnings is rarely an urgent or important matter, and it is often best to simply let the matter rest if other disruption stops. Important exceptions include declined unblock requests and confirmed sockpuppetry notices (while blocks are still in effect), as well as miscellany for deletion tags (while the discussion is in progress) or, for anonymous editors, shared IP header templates(left this--The Whois). These notices and templates are necessary in order to keep a user from gaming the system. Such templates are intended not only to communicate with the user in question, but to share important information about e.g. blocks and sockpuppetry with other users.


Per the above please LEAVE ME ALONE. I'm not vandalizing anything anymore!