User talk:68.52.42.38: Difference between revisions
m Reverted 1 edit by 68.52.42.38 identified as vandalism to last revision by Turian. (TW) |
And the rules say I can delete and I will all day long....sigh...be productive dude....I'm going to report you if you keep abusing my talk page. One more revert here and I'll report in 3 diff. places. |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
'''''Per the above please LEAVE ME ALONE. I'm not vandalizing anything anymore!''''' |
'''''Per the above please LEAVE ME ALONE. I'm not vandalizing anything anymore!''''' |
||
There is a rule about getting a fresh start too and I'll find that and then encourage your compliance with that as well. I am not in an edit war at American Airlines. That was a debate that is resolved with legitimate sources. STOP trying to harass me! |
|||
== September 2009 == |
|||
[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an '''[[WP:Edit war|edit war]]'''{{#if:American Airlines|  according to the reverts you have made on [[:American Airlines]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[WP:PP|page protection]]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> –[[User:Turian|'''<span style="color:#000000;">túrian</span>''']][[User_talk:Turian|''<span style="color:green;"><sup>patois</sup></span>'']] 03:03, 20 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:''If this is a shared [[IP address]], and you didn't make the edit, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' |
|||
There is a rule about getting a fresh start too and I'll find that and then encourage your compliance with that as well. I am not in an edit war at American Airlines. That was a debate that is resolved with legitimate sources. STOP trying to harass me! |
|||
:Reverting four times is edit warring. Reverting TWICE is edit warring. You edit warred. You didn't take it to the talk page. And a fresh start? Not really, you are a repeat vandal and will remain so. ––[[User:Turian|'''<span style="color:#000000;">túrian</span>''']][[User_talk:Turian|''<span style="color:green;"><sup>patois</sup></span>'']] 03:07, 20 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 03:39, 20 September 2009
 | Attention:
This . In the event of persistent vandalism from this address, efforts may be made to contact them to report abuse. Contact information may be available in the WHOIS report. If you are editing from this IP address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. Sometimes, in response to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to create an account. If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for the owner of the IP to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time. If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log). |
- Talk page is in compliance with WP:Blanking as follows:
Removal of comments, warnings Policy does not prohibit users, including both registered and anonymous users, from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred. The removal of a warning is taken as evidence that the warning has been read by the user. Deleted warnings can still be found in the page history. Repeatedly restoring warnings does nothing but antagonize users, and can encourage further disruption; removal of template warnings is rarely an urgent or important matter, and it is often best to simply let the matter rest if other disruption stops. Important exceptions include declined unblock requests and confirmed sockpuppetry notices (while blocks are still in effect), as well as miscellany for deletion tags (while the discussion is in progress) or, for anonymous editors, shared IP header templates(left this--The Whois). These notices and templates are necessary in order to keep a user from gaming the system. Such templates are intended not only to communicate with the user in question, but to share important information about e.g. blocks and sockpuppetry with other users.
Per the above please LEAVE ME ALONE. I'm not vandalizing anything anymore!