User talk:68.52.42.38

Talk page is in compliance with WP:Blanking as follows:

Removal of comments, warnings Policy does not prohibit users, including both registered and anonymous users, from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred. The removal of a warning is taken as evidence that the warning has been read by the user. Deleted warnings can still be found in the page history. Repeatedly restoring warnings does nothing but antagonize users, and can encourage further disruption; removal of template warnings is rarely an urgent or important matter, and it is often best to simply let the matter rest if other disruption stops. Important exceptions include declined unblock requests and confirmed sockpuppetry notices (while blocks are still in effect), as well as miscellany for deletion tags (while the discussion is in progress) or, for anonymous editors, shared IP header templates(left this--The Whois). These notices and templates are necessary in order to keep a user from gaming the system. Such templates are intended not only to communicate with the user in question, but to share important information about e.g. blocks and sockpuppetry with other users.

Per the above please LEAVE ME ALONE. I'm not vandalizing anything anymore!

There is a rule about getting a fresh start too and I'll find that and then encourage your compliance with that as well. I am not in an edit war at American Airlines. That was a debate that is resolved with legitimate sources. STOP trying to harass me!

September 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on American Airlines. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. –túrian^patois 03:03, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

There is a rule about getting a fresh start too and I'll find that and then encourage your compliance with that as well. I am not in an edit war at American Airlines. That was a debate that is resolved with legitimate sources. STOP trying to harass me!

Reverting four times is edit warring. Reverting TWICE is edit warring. You edit warred. You didn't take it to the talk page. And a fresh start? Not really, you are a repeat vandal and will remain so. ––túrian^patois 03:07, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Removal of warnings for blanking of content on IP talk page Bevinbell 03:54, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Blocked for one month

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

You've been shown every courtesy and still you insist on threatening users with "reports." Sorry, but this sort of disruption isn't allowed nor tolerated. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:36, 20 September 2009 (UTC)