Jump to content

User talk:Heliosphere: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 96: Line 96:


:If these comments were not directed towards me, my apologies for my confusion.- [[User talk:Sinneed|<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em; class=texhtml">Sinneed</span>]] 21:52, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
:If these comments were not directed towards me, my apologies for my confusion.- [[User talk:Sinneed|<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em; class=texhtml">Sinneed</span>]] 21:52, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

== Problematic edit at Sikh extremism ==

[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Sikh_extremism&diff=prev&oldid=315565424 Here] you have removed substantial sourced, seemingly relevant content. I struggle to [[wp:assume good faith]] as you have not discussed this edit, and the edit summary does not explain why this section was deleted. Please join the discussion on the [[wp:talk]] page, following the [[wp:talk page guidelines]], and please provide [[wp:edit summaries]] that explain the reason for the edit.

Further, when removing sources, it is essential to be sure that you do not damage the article. A bot repaired the damage, in this case, but this is not always successful.- [[User talk:Sinneed|<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em; class=texhtml">Sinneed</span>]] 21:57, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:57, 22 September 2009

Welcome!

Hello, Heliosphere! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! - sinneed (talk) 13:25, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of South African Sports hall of Fame, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.sabcnews.com/portal/site/SABCNews/menuitem.4db0398e8cee80702ea12ea1674daeb9/?vgnextoid=ea253148f814f110VgnVCM10000077d4ea9bRCRD&vgnextfmt=print. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:55, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiquette

I have stared a section at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts in the hope that uninvolved ordinary editors might make suggestions in regard to your (or my) behaviour. These are just ordinary editors like you and I, who are very likely not to know either of us. Any advice they offer either of us is simply advice on how better to work in Wikipedia.- sinneed (talk) 21:26, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back.

Welcome back.

While I appreciate the thought of being given credit for every edit to the Kim Bolan article from 30 May to 9 July, it might be a bit misleading, as the actual edit for that edit summary was here and the edit removing the wp:COPYVIO content with its edit summary was here.

Of course, I am a big fan of Ms. Bolan, and added the expanded, corrected, cited, non-copyright-violating awards, much to the unhappiness of some editors who dislike her work. Please be cautious not to mislead folk with diffs.- Sinneed 21:49, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, I am quite proud of my work there, making most of the edits taking the article to its current state from when I joined the article editing there.- Sinneed 21:51, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If your a big fan of Bolan then don't accuse her of being an extremist Jew

Anyway you tried to have me banned, but you failed, precisely because you say one thing and give another impression, its funny but the intentions are pretty obvious Heliosphere (talk) 19:29, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It seems this may be directed towards me. If so, then it includes unacceptable and incorrect statement:
  • "If your a big fan of Bolan then don't accuse her of being an extremist Jew". I most certainly have never classified anyone as "an extremist Jew".
  • "Anyway you tried to have me banned". I have not ever and do not ever plan to suggest, support, or !vote for a community ban of any editor.
If these comments were not directed towards me, my apologies for my confusion.- Sinneed 21:52, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic edit at Sikh extremism

Here you have removed substantial sourced, seemingly relevant content. I struggle to wp:assume good faith as you have not discussed this edit, and the edit summary does not explain why this section was deleted. Please join the discussion on the wp:talk page, following the wp:talk page guidelines, and please provide wp:edit summaries that explain the reason for the edit.

Further, when removing sources, it is essential to be sure that you do not damage the article. A bot repaired the damage, in this case, but this is not always successful.- Sinneed 21:57, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]