User talk:SteveSims

Feel free to communicate with me here.

IE7

=I wasn't saying anyone was lying. Even I found IE to be slow, especially on AJAX-heavy pages - even locking up the UI thread (thats blasphemous!). I just said that unless backed by some source, we cannot put it, no matter what our own experience is. --soum^সৌমোyasch 08:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Yep. I totally agree with that. I saw a review on a Slashdotted article, days after IE7 was released, doing the speed tests. Can't find that now.:( --soum^সৌমোyasch 09:32, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

MyWay-related posts

Myway

Hi, it looks like someone is trying to remove the good research you have done on Myway. The person has the login "Kirk_lawrence". There also happens to be an employee by that name at Ask Jeeves, which owns Myway. When doing a google search for "Myway Searchbar", your page is the first to come up, generating a lot of negative publicity for Myway / Ask Jeeves.

The page "Myway Searchbar" was moved to "Myway Speedbar", which has no info on spyware.

I have undone the move, but you may want to keep a watch on this stuff.

It is unclear to me what the difference between Myway Speedbar and Myway Searchbar is.

Alan Rockefeller (Talk - contribs) 23:50, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

---

That is correct. I am the director of Customer Support for IAC Search & Media. I'd really like to get in touch offline - why don't you send me an email at klawrence at ask d0t c0m, and I'll reply with relevant information to help you discern the fact from the fiction

• Provide me with an e-mail address or a telephone number. Is your email ------@ask.com?

Yes, that is correct klawrence @ the search engine (easiest to type), or @IACSAM.com. Please do get in touch.

Also, your company seems to operate many sock puppets that compromise the MyWay articles' accuracy. Also, don't use open-mindedness and neutrality to mask the fact that your products are spyware.SteveSims 22:41, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Myway Message

> The user kirk_lawrence is claiming to be IAC Search and Media's communications director.

I totally believe him. This thing came to my attention when I was watching the "recent changes", looking for vandalism to revert. (for fun) I saw the myway searchbar article get redirected to a page with no content, and when I looked at the users contributions, I was appalled. Here was a real marketing guy from a spyware company removing info from wikipedia about his products, right before my very eyes. I added all the relevant myway pages to my watchlist, and it has been really enjoyable to watch obviously the same guy come back with different usernames, trying to stamp the spyware info out.

> I will probably contact an administrator with IAC's attempts to skew the MyWay article so that it doesn't appear to be spyware.

I am not quite sure what an administrator could do about this, maybe because I am very new to wikipedia.

He hasn't really made any unreasonable changes yet, but he is certainly threatening to do so. :)

Can't wait for the big revision. It will be a big load of crap with some useful info in there, and will need to be heavily edited for accuracy. If it so unreasonable that it becomes relevant, we would need to add a section to the article documenting the corporations attempts to modify reality.

I will always back you up, in any case.

> Will you back me up, and keep an eye on the MyWay page too?

I watch all the myway related pages, even zwinky! I will probably continue to do so for the next 50 years or so, just because it is really entertaining.

Alan Rockefeller (Talk - contribs) 03:23, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: Myway

You are allowed to contact a Admin. I will keep an eye on it anyways. - Mike Beckham 11:22, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

From IAC Search and Media, the company that owns MyWay

Well Steve, Since you won't communicate with me, you leave me no choice but to take this to Wikipedia themselves to get a resolution.

They're baaaaaaaaaacccck!!!

Our good friends and business partners at IAC Search and Media‎ have returned!

I was just thinking about them today.

The one guy seems to be really close to me, only 5 traceroute hops, apparently in communication with his friend in France who hit IAC Search and Media‎ this morning.

Its good to talk to you; what have you been up to?

Alan Rockefeller (Talk - contribs) 05:01, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Kirk_Lawrence 22:27, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

pop-up blocker

Hi Steve... I'm not sure what to say about your situation with the pop-up blocker that can fix the problem for sure. Maybe you did disable the pop-up blocker, but maybe some nefarious (or bumbling) piece of software did it for you? Hmmm. Try this: Go back to the web site, and when you hit the page with pop-ups, an icon will appear on the status bar... second box from the left. Click it and have a look through the options to see if you can change things. If nothing else, you can go to Tools -> Internet Options -> Advanced tab, and hit "Reset...". That'll change IE completely back to the out-of-the-box default. After that, go into Tools -> Manage Add-ons and re-enable the add-ons you want, like Flash or Quicktime. Hope this helps, good luck! -/- Warren 02:42, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Licence is the noun, license is the verb.

Hi, thanks for catching the "news paper" typo on Permissive and copyleft licences, but the other change you made was a false positive. LicenCe is the noun, and licenSe is the verb. This is true for UK, Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand (and India). In the USA, they use "license" for both (and the Philippines). Gronky 13:02, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Metrication of Mount Rainier

Please see Talk:Mount Rainier#Metrication for an explanation of why I reverted your changes to metricize Mount Rainier. -- Patleahy 21:40, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Reply

Thanks for letting me know, but in the future, you should probably try WP:AIV. Cheers, Khoikhoi 03:52, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

argument map image typos

Thanks for letting me know Steve, it also has another typo in the upper right green box: "If more roads were build (sic)". I spend a lot of time on them to make sure that no significant terms appear by themselves (logical structure) but they are all filled with typos. Grumpyyoungman01 05:18, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Office Open XML

I reverted your vandalism on the Office Open XML article. Changing the article to put openoffice spam in first line of the article is just not acceptable. This particular article is often a target of anti-microsoft and/or odf supporter edits and I am tempted to report suchs incidents but I in a quick glance have not seen any evidence on your other contributions of such incidents so there seems no reason for that. I will however report future atempts to alter the Office Open XML article for adding more blatant OpenOffice spammoring according with WP:AIV. hAl 09:33, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

I've undone the revert, as it was evidently not vandalism: please see discussion at Talk:Office Open XML#OpenOffice.org link. Thanks, Clicketyclack 10:57, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

It might seem was was hasty in my conclusion as I did see a lot of people trying to slip in links in the Office Open XML article to OpenDocument en OpenOffice.org and other ODF related articles and websites in support of Opendocument in what is sometimes called 'the office format war'. I apologize for possible offence. hAl 11:56, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

SSA stats and figures

Official links are on the talk page. You want them, you should check it out. More stats and figures than you would want to see.

KV(Talk) 02:10, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Editing Image:Mozilla-firefox-usage-data.svg

How did you edit this image with a text editor? I'd like to update it (and other SVG usage share charts), but when I right click to save it the default filename is "Image:Mozilla-firefox-usage-data.svg.png" and when I change the extension to a pure PNG, the file will not open in Inkscape and appears as gibberish in Notepad and gedit. I use Linux but I've tested it on Windows XP computers and I still can't modify it. SteveSims 02:42, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Download the SVG rather than the rasterized image ;) Since most browsers don't support SVG, mediawiki rasterises SVG images before displaying them ... You need to right click and save the image via the link with its name, underneath the image. Then just open it with your text editor or Inkscape. But if you use Inkscape try to clean it up before uploading it ;) Inkscape spits out a load of crap. --Tene 12:26, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

*buntu Userbox Icons

Hi, much better second attempt at those images, one thing I would say though, whenever you do any more userbox images, make the size of the image (in the image syntax) 45px, for example

[[Image:test.png|45px]]

This way the userbox doesn't get stretched, oh and also, could make two sorts of those images for the Ubuntu Studio and Goobuntu userboxes, that way all of them would fit in with eachother. Oh and last of all, I can see you have a profile on wikimedia commons, (or maybe that isn't you) if you upload them there, they can be used for all wikimedia projects which is a lot more useful than just limiting it to the English Wikipedia. > Rugby471 ^talk ⚔ 06:40, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Ha ha, very good :-) > Rugby471 ^talk ⚔ 08:03, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Yes, use these colors ( they are in html value )

1. 292929
   -Outline of circle thing
2. 009bf9
   -Circles

And lose the circle in the middle. Have fun !

Hi, good work on all of those icons, I know it wasn't anyhting fantastic (as you wrote on the image's page!) but it was a great idea and so I'm going to award you this :-

		The Minor Graphic Designer's Barnstar
		I award you this barnstar on your innovative work on the *buntu userbox icons > Rugby471 talk ⚔ 15:55, 11 July 2007 (UTC) .

Spelling Mistake

Found it gramm * e * r > Rugby471 ^talk ⚔ 07:41, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Ubuntu-icon-pd2.png

Can you make another version of Ubuntu-icon-pd2.png, but with the circles outside the curves? —Some Person 23:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

FYI

Don't worry, deleting the "pimp" userbox won't delete your whole userpage. The reason the deletion message comes up on your main userpage is because the userbox is transcluded on to your page, so the deletion notification automatically appears as well. If you don't want the deletion message there, you can substitute the userbox for the time being. Walton^One 17:25, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Pimp Userbox

Userbox

Can we discuss about your pimp userbox some? I think it doesn't exactly fall within a good taste and pimping is considered a crime in most places. Someone I edit with insists on keeping this userbox on a userpage just because it exists. I think I could propose it for deletion but I ask first what do you think. The easiest way would be that you deleted it yourself with {{db-userreq}}. Thank you. :) Rhanyeia 11:01, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Pimp Userbox

I've added my piece, and will keep an eye on the matter. Best of luck, I'll do more if I think I can. Jay 02:04, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

This seems to be going nowhere. KP Botany obviously has NO idea what we're talking about, and he's the only one fighting against it anymore. What do you wanna do? Jay 05:26, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

If something on your user page is making a few editors upset, is it really that important to keep it on there? Voluntarily deleting the Pimp Userbox before the close of the MfD would be a nice gesture. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 22:12, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Pimps

I don't support pimps on Wikipedia, and if you had read my talk page, you would have seen that. I am grossly offended by the pimp user box and put it on my user page to draw attention to it so someone would seek deletion. Do you know anything about pimping, by the way? KP Botany 02:41, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Minor edits

Hi, please do not mark edits like these as minor — you are changing the meaning of the statement, which users watching the article typically want to be aware of. You should only mark edits as minor when they don't change the meaning (e.g. spelling, formatting, etc). Have a look at WP:MINOR if you haven't already. -- intgr [talk] 01:55, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Crapware.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Crapware.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 01:29, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

No free alternatives does not mean that fair use automatically applies to all low-res copyrighted images that might work. It did not "illustrate the subject," it just served to deride Vista (as crappy as it may be). The article was speedy deleted in the meantime by another admin so the point is effectively moot. Fair use is not a blanket reason to use copyrighted material, it is only to be used when necessary. Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria reads: "Significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. Non-free media files are not used if they can be replaced by text that serves a similar function." Besides, I'm sure there is plenty of free software that could be considered crapware. Mr.Z-man 01:50, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Zunephone

A tag has been placed on Zunephone, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. ~Matticus ^T_C 08:34, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Never mind - you turned it into a redirect seconds before Twinkle finished tagging it. I've detagged it again. ~Matticus ^T_C 08:36, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Zunephone

I have nominated Zunephone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Mugunth 14:13, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Replied to Zunephone -> Windows Mobile.

Please check it out here... [1] Mugunth 08:39, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Norman Sperling.JPG

Thanks for that image. I hope you don't mind that I modified it, as allowed by the GFDL, by cropping it and adjusting the contrast very slightly. I think it makes a better portrait this way – who cares about that guy in the background anyway? --Kbh3^rdtalk 19:56, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Unit: cm

Hi Steve, I have nominated the redirect Unit: cm for speedy deletion because the template it redirects to, {{Unit cm}}, has been deleted. Regards, PatLeahy (talk) 02:49, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Bot messages

Orphaned fair use image (Image:My Search Bar 1 Add or Remove Programs.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:My Search Bar 1 Add or Remove Programs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 06:32, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:My Search Bar 2 IE script error before uninstaller loads.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:My Search Bar 2 IE script error before uninstaller loads.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 06:32, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:My Search Bar 3 uninstall screen.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:My Search Bar 3 uninstall screen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 06:33, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:My Search Bar 4 after clicking Uninstall.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:My Search Bar 4 after clicking Uninstall.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 06:33, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Firefox 2,0,0,3.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Firefox 2,0,0,3.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 02:05, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Firefox_2,0,0,3.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Firefox_2,0,0,3.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Iamunknown 17:01, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:IE7ProReview.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:IE7ProReview.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Commercial use of Image:IE7GlobeSlash.svg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:IE7GlobeSlash.svg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:IE7GlobeSlash.svg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:IE7GlobeSlash.svg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:51, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:SteveSimsPimpHat WhiteBackground.mid

Thanks for uploading Image:SteveSimsPimpHat WhiteBackground.mid. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:09, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:IE6ubuntu.png

Thanks for uploading Image:IE6ubuntu.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 06:06, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

I provided fair use rationale for your image. Feel free to review. --BsayUSD [Talk] [contribs] 20:07, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Goobuntu-icon-pd2.png. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Goobuntu.png. The copy called Image:Goobuntu.png has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 07:45, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Devtoolbar.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Devtoolbar.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:17, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Google-censorship.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Google-censorship.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:16, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Internet Explorer 6.png deletion

Hi Steve,

On 5/19 you added a {{Replaceable fair use}} tag to Image:Internet Explorer 6.png. Maybe it wasn't your intention, but this means you requested that the image be deleted from Wikipedia. I've reviewed the request and determined that the image is not a candidate for speedy deletion because it is not replaceable. Use of the image seems to be appropriate fair use on at least the article about Internet Explorer. I've removed the deletion tag. Rhobite 17:07, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

LiNsta Firefox image

Hello, I was wondering. Do you have an SVG version of the Image:Firefox LiNsta.png? I really like it and I want to use it for an icon, but the PNG doesn't scale right in Ubuntu. Losses to much detail and quality when its scaled down some. Theyain Riyu (talk) 07:05, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gnash-logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Gnash-logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SoftimageXSI4 2Screenshot.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:SoftimageXSI4 2Screenshot.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Recyclebinempty.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Recyclebinempty.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

WHHLPA

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Women's Health and Human Life Protection Act. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Groupthink (talk) 05:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Pro-choice implies that it should be the woman's choice, and is used by groups supportive of legalized abortion. Pro-life implies that aborting a fetus destroys a life, and is used by groups opposed to legalized abortion. The terms I use describe both groups, but aren't loaded since neither group uses them to describe themselves, among other reasons. Allow me to explain:

From the pro-life viewpoint, a woman's choice is less important than a baby's life, just as anybody's right to choose to murder somebody is less important than their right to live. On the same token, from a pro-choice viewpoint, a woman's right to choose to abort something that clearly isn't a life is more important than the government's right to tell her otherwise.

So, pro-abortion and anti-abortion only show whether you think abortion should or shouldn't be legal, and don't imply that the other side is anti-choice or anti-life. They're much more neutral and more accurate than pro-choice" and pro-life. SteveSims (talk) 06:02, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Windows Vista Speech Recognition Tutorial.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Windows Vista Speech Recognition Tutorial.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Obamacan

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Obamacan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Obamacan. Q ^{T C} 06:29, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:GPL-GFDL-cc-by-sa-3.0

A tag has been placed on Template:GPL-GFDL-cc-by-sa-3.0 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:33, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:GPL-GFDL-cc-by-sa-3.0-Beerware

A tag has been placed on Template:GPL-GFDL-cc-by-sa-3.0-Beerware requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:33, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:GPL-GFDL-cc-by-sa-3.0-beerware

A tag has been placed on Template:GPL-GFDL-cc-by-sa-3.0-beerware requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:33, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Contemporary public figures opposed to lowering the voting age to 18

Category:Contemporary public figures opposed to lowering the voting age to 18, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – VegaDark (talk) 21:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Alexey Tolstokozhev

A tag has been placed on Alexey Tolstokozhev requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SABER^EXCALIBUR! 03:28, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008 Student Walkouts

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article March 2008 Student Walkouts, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 07:59, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Alameda High School

Hello, I've reverted your last edit to Alameda High School [2] which transcluded the entire Encinal HS article into the Alameda HS one. Please consider using the See also in-line template to point to the Encinal High School subsection. Using the preview button can help avoid problems like this. Thanks. – Zedla (talk) 09:45, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello again, a transclusion will only take the entire source, not a subsection. Without commenting on the content, the best approach would be to write in the Alameda HS article about that school's participation in the event and to use an appropriate in-line template from Category:Wikipedia_page-section_templates like Template:Details or the see-also template mentioned above. Thanks – Zedla (talk) 07:17, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Typo redirect Bill Clinton presidential campaign, 2008

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Bill Clinton presidential campaign, 2008, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Bill Clinton presidential campaign, 2008 is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Bill Clinton presidential campaign, 2008, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:30, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

• I forgot to log out from a public computer. Sorry about that. SteveSims (talk) 21:07, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Silverlight

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Web 2.0, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.

Gen.Y

Good edits. DGG (talk) 18:46, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Examples of well known sockpuppets

See the sockpuppet talk page for one particular example I think should be included. Or at least looking for an argument against it. SteveCoppock (talk) 22:57, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Student Action

An editor has nominated Student Action, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Student Action and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. 91.198.174.194 (talk) 15:41, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

[Re:your message]. Sorry, but I still support deleting the Student Action and CalSERVE article. My reasons are listed at the AFD pages: no notability, no reliable third party sources, total original research. These are fundamental principles of wikipedia. If you are able to find enough reliable secondary sources to establish notability, then the articles will survive AFD. --SevernSevern (talk) 23:15, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Repost of User:SteveSims/Storage/CalServe

A tag has been placed on User:SteveSims/Storage/CalServe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how User:SteveSims/Storage/CalServe is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on [[Talk:User:SteveSims/Storage/CalServe]] saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. SevernSevern (talk) 05:27, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Repost of User:SteveSims/Storage/List of Executives of the ASUC

A tag has been placed on User:SteveSims/Storage/List of Executives of the ASUC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how User:SteveSims/Storage/List of Executives of the ASUC is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on [[Talk:User:SteveSims/Storage/List of Executives of the ASUC]] saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. SevernSevern (talk) 05:27, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Repost of Student Action

A tag has been placed on User:SteveSims/Storage/Student Action, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how User:SteveSims/Storage/Student Action is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on [[Talk:User:SteveSims/Storage/Student Action]] saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. SevernSevern (talk) 05:16, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Legislation sponsored by Ron Paul

An article that you have been involved in editing, Legislation sponsored by Ron Paul, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legislation sponsored by Ron Paul. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?

Image copyright problem with Image:Democratic presidential primary results.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Democratic presidential primary results.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:30, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Two TfD nominations

A set of two templates that you have been involved in editing, Template:Ron Paul and Template:RonPaul, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 April 23#Template:Ron Paul and/or Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 April 21#Template:RonPaul. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? JJB 20:08, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

One TFD was closed keep and the other looks likely to be kept also. A consensus of 4 appears to have developed at Template talk:Ron Paul to merge the two templates (plus perhaps Celarnor at TFD). Would appreciate it if you stated there any further desire you might have to woo the other editors toward keeping both, as otherwise someone is likely to conclude the merge by redirecting sooner or later. JJB 18:27, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Elesha Gayman

A few months ago, you made this edit to Elesha Gayman. Unfortunately, that information is currently unsourced - would you happen to remember where you found it? --Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 02:49, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! --Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 03:09, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Paulville, Texas

I have just created a new article at Paulville, Texas, and wanted to invite you and a handful of other friends to have first crack at helping to improve it. Cheers! JJB 21:55, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Chav001.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Chav001.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly ^hi! 15:11, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Trevor Lyman

An article that you have been involved in editing, Trevor Lyman, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trevor Lyman. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?

Chávez discussion

You might be interested in this discussion[3]

election maps

first of all, the maps I made look absolutely presentable that people can look at them and they are faithful to not only the states votes, but to the scheme most universally recognized by the vast majority of people, and because on the 1980-2004 maps, red=Republican blue=Democrat, and most people know this scheme, and has been ingrained in most people, all the maps should have this. Also, the bars under the candidate names and the text colors in the "close states" section should match, otherwise, the maps are confusing, and so is the site then for electoral maps. People should be able to accurately research with this site, and expect consistency, which is important for encyclopedic value. Not to mention, on this page on this page and even on this page use Red=Republican Blue=Democrat, so how can you have both of those, the maps 1980-2004 in that scheme, the bars under the faces of candidates with that scheme, list of close states, but have other maps in the opposite scheme? It makes zero sense! However, if anyone can improve upon my maps, or make the svg. ones like on the 1992-2004 maps, I'll welcome it, if it uses the universally recognized color scheme. Until someone does this, the maps I uploaded look good enough to be on the site. Also, my maps are ALL png.Tallicfan20 (talk) 08:14, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

You did a great job on that 1984 and 1980 svg maps. Are you going to put the 1980 one up or do a 1988 one? Do you think we should make all the maps svg? I also noticed you have the wrong electoral vote numbers on the 1980 map in the different states. Remember, the 1980 census numbers didn't go into effect until after 1980. Tallicfan20 (talk) 00:49, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Superb job on the new maps, keep em coming. But on some maps, with the faithless electors, I was thinking, like in 1976, if a faithless elector votes for a person of the same party, as one did for Reagan, use a circle around the number in a lighter shade of red for Reagan in 1976. Also, if you could somehow indicate on the 2000 map that one elector from DC abstained. Otherwise, excellent job!Tallicfan20 (talk) 19:58, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Whats goin on with those other election maps?Tallicfan20 (talk) 08:46, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Are you going to complete more svg Presidential election maps? Tallicfan20 (talk) 17:09, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

the maps are looking good there, keep em coming! Tallicfan20 (talk) 23:47, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:FFnet-27Jan07.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:FFnet-27Jan07.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Regarding Bill and Hillary Clinton.

I'm just here to say that Bill Clinton is only considered a Third Way politician because of his fiscal positions (his domestic and foreign policy were both liberal). But if you want to leave him out of the group, that's fine, I can see that. But Hillary Clinton is definitely a liberal. Because of her liberal stances, she sometimes disagreed with her husband. 68.46.26.135 (talk) 01:35, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Supporting the Death Penalty isn't solely for Conservatives. I know many liberals who support (and I know just as many who oppose it). "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" was made as a compromise after the Republican Revolution, involving the Democrats and Republicans.

The Iraq War was voted on by almost every Democrat in congress--- not just Hillary. 68.46.26.135 (talk) 16:18, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Okay then, I see what you mean. 68.46.26.135 (talk) 17:44, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

South Ossetia

Russian soldieres are peacekeepers. It is their official status. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bestalex (talk • contribs) 16:20, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Giant Starfish.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Giant Starfish.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 18:47, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD

I've nominated Obama Republican and McCain Democrat for deletion. Northwestgnome (talk) 18:18, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Criticism of government response to Hurricane Katrina Image

The image you are adding to this article is uncited and about an event not refered to anywhere within the article. Please supply a reputable cite that criticises Bush for attending McCain's birthday in relation to government response to Hurricane Katrina. Without a cite the implication of the image and caption is that Bush should have been criticized for doing so, which appears to be your unsupported personal opinion. Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 09:45, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

I second this motion. McCain has absolutely nothing to do with Hurricane Katrina, which means that its purpose is purely political. It has just as much relevance as a photo of Barack Obama shaking hands with William Ayers on the 2008 US Election page. None. MrDestructo (talk) 00:15, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

MrDestructo: I removed the McCain image from the Criticism of Government Response to Hurricane Katrina page. However, your analogy is false: Bush visited Arizona hours after Katrina hit landfall, while Obama was a child when Ayers bombed the Pentagon. SteveSims (talk) 18:15, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

WP AH

This user wants you to join
WikiProject
Alternate History.

Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 12:39, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

California Proposition 11 (2008)

It seems you made this page redirect to itself. Did you intent to do something else? – Zntrip 05:09, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

That's okay, I just wanted to make sure you were aware of it. I hope to eventually make the page into an actual article so everything should work out. – Zntrip 05:34, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

October 2008

Please do not insert charged wording as you did with your move of Proposed bailout of United States financial system. - BanyanTree 02:53, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Swing States, 2004

Hi. In your image linked above, I noticed you have Colorado colored blue. Colorado went for Bush in 2004, not Kerry. Timmeh! 23:03, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

• Thanks for notifying me. I'll fix it. SteveSims (talk) 00:35, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Swing states

I have noticed you claimed Oregon as a swing state??? Do you care to explain your reasoning????Nissanaltima (talk) 06:26, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Copy protection move

Hi,

Twice in six months you have moved copy protection to copy prevention despite there being consensus to have the article at the other title on the talk page. I have moved this back again, and dummy-edited the copy prevention page to prevent further non-admin moves. If you wish to have it moved again, please first establish consensus on the talk page. I don't believe this will be forthcoming, as Wikipedia refers to subjects by their most common name, and not the "correct" one (by whatever metric a user declares). Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 13:41, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Bradley effect

Hi, back in July you added to the Bradley effect article, "for example, many polls underpoll African-Americans and young voters." Recently a user requested a citation for this statement. Do you you have any sources that you could add to the article that supports this? Thanks. Khoikhoi 02:07, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Flash9 Linux.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Flash9 Linux.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Swing states, 2008

Hi. I'm just wondering, since you uploaded the above linked image, if you could remove Virginia from the states within 5% (change it to the neutral color) as the margin is outside 5%. Thanks. Timmeh! 04:33, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

NC

Hi, Why is North Carolina gray again? Jcwf (talk) 04:41, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Calling NC because 100% of the precincts have reported

100% precincts reporting means that all ballots that were cast on election night were counted. See for example the AK senate race. 100% reporting, but still more than 70,000 votes to be counted (until a few hours ago). Guy0307 (talk) 11:52, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Page Move

Just to give you a heads-up, I am moving Pennsylvania State Senate elections, 2008 back to Pennsylvania Senate elections, 2008. You said that moved the pages to avoid confusion with US senate races, which I understand. However, a federal senate election in Pennsylvania would fall under a title pattern like United States Senate election in Pennsylvania, 2006.

The upper house of the Pennsylvania legislature is properly referred to as the "Pennsylvania Senate" or "Senate of Pennsylvania." "Pennsylvania State Senate" is colloquial. I am not sure how other states on Wikipedia do it, but if you take a look, we have election pages for the Pennsylvania Senate all the way back to 2000, for all 50 senate districts, and for all 50 senators. If you are interested, we are always looking for help maintaining those pages. --HoboJones (talk) 16:07, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD which might be of interest to you

You contributed to the article so I'm letting you know: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John McCain lobbyist controversy, February 2008 Borock (talk) 10:06, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Dennis Kucinich

If you'd like to try your edit in an NPOV manner, I think you might get away with it. Ccady (talk) 14:52, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Party colour/Party color templates

I recently undid your moves of several party color templates for Republican, Democratic, and Democratic-Republican. While I understand your desire for the American English spelling, those templates evolved over many years, predominately by a British editor, hence "colour" instead of "color." I agree it is bizarre, but this issue has been debated extensively before (I can't recall or find the discussion right now), and it was determined that colour would remain since the templates are already widespread throughout WP, and major moves or changes could break dozens or articles.

I reverted for several reasons.

• 1) while it is true American spellings are preferred in American articles, these are templates only and the spelling difference is only apparent when editing the raw text.
• 2) making moves solely based on a spelling preference is generally frowned upon, particularly if one usage has been the common one in use originally, as with this template.
• 3) without making corresponding and conforming edits to the templates themselves as well as every article that uses them (dozens if not hundreds of articles use them as well as election templates) the move resulted in articles full of redirects.
• 4) The manual of style states the "Arbitration Committee has ruled that the Manual of Style is not binding, that editors should not change an article from one guideline-defined style to another without a substantial reason unrelated to mere choice of style."

The MOS also urges against revert warring, so I am notifying you of my changes and my stated reasons for doing so to help clarify my reverts and answer any questions you may have. It is not my intent to get into an edit war with you, and on principal I agree with the intent of your moves (I agree the categories should probably be renamed, as you have done). I was merely retaining consistency in dozens of articles that has evolved over time, rather than focusing on minor spelling differences. Hope this helps.DCmacnut<> 07:13, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

No, there shouldn't be breaks in general. However, the articles would be full of redirects from the old "colour", so unless someone went through and changed them all to "color" what would the purpose of the move/redirect be? The british spelling would still be in the article code. Also, the /row templates still referenced back to the "colour" template, so you had a transcluded template that was also a redirect. I'm not saying it would have caused trouble, but the potential was there given how many pages and other templates use the "colour" templates, and making the move really wasn't necessary (in my view). Also, the moving of categories, while acceptable, has led to several broken top level category links from Category:Political party colour templates. Also, see this talk page regarding the /meta/color templates. It is noted that the spelling originally used would remain (in this case, the American spelling) even for British political parties. By extension, an editor chose to stick with "colour" for the /row templates, to keep the standard already in place for other countries' political partices, so I see no reason why we shouldn't in this case as well.DCmacnut<> 20:28, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

111th US Senate composition.svg

I've left a note for you on your commons talk page about the above image. I thought I'd let you know here in case you don't check there very often. Since I certainly don't check there often, if you have any questions or comments for me, leave them at my Wikipedia talk page. -Rrius (talk) 10:31, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Beerware

Template:Beerware has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. B (talk) 17:26, 20 July 2009 (UTC)