User talk:AussieLegend: Difference between revisions
AussieLegend (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
:No, I can't agree with you. By editing the template the way I did, the previous structure (the fields, except for a few that had to be edited) remained unchanged, something that obviously couldn't have happened had the template been deleted. Where should I discuss my changes? In the talk page of the template a discussion would go unnoticed for months. But you, what do you think is wrong with my version of [[Template:Australian state or territory]]? How is it worse (or better) than the version you reverted to?--[[Special:Contributions/93.45.59.26|93.45.59.26]] ([[User talk:93.45.59.26|talk]]) 16:40, 25 September 2009 (UTC) |
:No, I can't agree with you. By editing the template the way I did, the previous structure (the fields, except for a few that had to be edited) remained unchanged, something that obviously couldn't have happened had the template been deleted. Where should I discuss my changes? In the talk page of the template a discussion would go unnoticed for months. But you, what do you think is wrong with my version of [[Template:Australian state or territory]]? How is it worse (or better) than the version you reverted to?--[[Special:Contributions/93.45.59.26|93.45.59.26]] ([[User talk:93.45.59.26|talk]]) 16:40, 25 September 2009 (UTC) |
||
::If you want to discuss this, I suggest you open a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board]] --[[User:AussieLegend|AussieLegend]] ([[User talk:AussieLegend#top|talk]]) 16:44, 25 September 2009 (UTC) |
::If you want to discuss this, I suggest you open a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board]] --[[User:AussieLegend|AussieLegend]] ([[User talk:AussieLegend#top|talk]]) 16:44, 25 September 2009 (UTC) |
||
:I will. But in the end, you reverted because you found something wrong in the template, right? What was it?--[[Special:Contributions/93.45.59.26|93.45.59.26]] ([[User talk:93.45.59.26|talk]]) 16:48, 25 September 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:48, 25 September 2009
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | bad sources etc |
This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:AussieLegend. |
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31 |
(Discussions here are automatically indexed by User:HBC Archive Indexerbot) |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Reverted 1 edit by 70.75.15.165 identified as vandalism to last revision by Accdude92.
I did not revise article talk selena gomez...Accdude92 (talk) (sign) 13:43, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- According to the edit history you did. --AussieLegend (talk) 13:52, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
lol O Yeah, such a minor edit I forgot I did it!Accdude92 (talk) (sign) 14:09, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
sock
I will amit that I am to this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Fjfhgfhdstty But I tried to floow the rules on this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry#Legitimate_uses_of_alternative_accounts and it said to add this {{User Alt Acct Master}}. So can you tell me how to to keep getting blocked so I can stop creating accounts. As far a JimConroy38 I am not a sock of him here’s why. I am an RTV student and I just wanted to find out if he is a real person so I put trhis on his talk page are you the real person that is does the voice of Ruff. can you please tell me if you are. please be honest. thanks Extremeguy (talk) 18:24, 1 September 2009 (UTC), he responded with this Yeah that's me I am the Voice of Ruff Ruffman is there anything I can help you guys with or do you have any questions you want to ask me. --JimConroy38 (talk) 04:09, 2 September 2009 (UTC). After aoi put User name concern on his page he comes back to me saying Hey Extremeguy they think I'm not Jim Conroy do something I tried everything.--JimConroy38 (talk) 21:57, 8 September 2009 (UTC) whiuch made me now belive he is not the real person. So I tried something Okay let's give this a try. Question's • How to you produce the show fetch with ruff ruffman from start to finish? • How do you Get a hold of Kate taylor or macy guther from the show? • what kind of screen is used when you produce fetch? • Do you travel with the contestants while doing the voice of Ruff or how is it done? • How long does it take to Make one season from start to finish? please explain answers in detail Also I suggest that you make a twitter account or some other kind of account. So you you know Ruffman is already taken for a user name. Also you could update the production and Cast and crew section on the fetch page thanks please respond. also it is listed at the bottom of the page. follow this (via the directions on WP:REALNAME). Extremeguy (talk) 23:25, 8 September 2009 after I posted this he never responded. He just kept editing the fetch page. So I have nothing in to do with JimConroy38 I was just trying to find out if he was the real person. I do think now he should be blocked in till he confirms himself. I think he is just being nice because I only belived him at first. His ewdits are so far apart I kind of belived it was him. Also he released the Season 5 Grand Champion which the real person would not be allowed to do. I will be posting this information on him on the page you created about him with my other one I summitted. Thanks please respondExtremeguy (talk) 20:04, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
(Formerly under Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fjfhgfhdstty) → Case is now completed after requesting CheckUser. All accounts reported have been sockblocked, which also includes a few extra ones just discovered by CU. Regards, MuZemike 21:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know. Cheers. --AussieLegend (talk) 04:47, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Michael Gallacher
I remember that when Michael Gallacher was selected for a vacancy in the NSW Legislative Council he had defeated a former Liberal minister who had lost her seat in the Lower House at the 1995 election. I forgotten who the former Liberal Minister was, do you by any chance know?--122.106.91.236 (talk) 20:23, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- No, I'm afraid I don't know offhand. --AussieLegend (talk) 13:41, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Extremeguy is back, apparently
I'm sure you've probably already noticed this, but just in case you have not, Extremeguy is evading his block again. See Special:Contributions/Fetchfan88. He's already posted on my talk page and his grammar matches Extremeguy exactly, and the majority of his edits so far deal with the Fetch articles. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 02:15, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Edit to Two and A Half Men
Your right about the title, someone changed the title on the episode list that includes all seasons and when i looked it up on google, IMBd was the first link and it sayed it was the title i changed it to. Though after seeing your edit i have checked the CBS site and your right. i have edited the episode list that includes all seasons accrodingly. Sorry for the mistake. CalumH93 (talk) 14:13, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Australian infobox
That was a meant to be a test, but since everything seemed to work perfectly I thought I'd leave it that way to generate some feedback. Isn't that a good way to see if there's consensus or not on an edit? Can you leave it as it was for a while to see if people like it or prefer it the way it was before?--93.45.59.26 (talk) 15:56, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- This template was recently the subject of a TfD and the result of the TfD was "Keep", which clearly indicates that the consensus is to leave the template as is. Changing live templates is not the way to determine consensus. If you want to determine people's opinion, open a discussion. --AussieLegend (talk) 16:00, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- But I never meant to delete it! The discussion determined that the template was needed, not that it was perfect as it was… otherwise it would have been edit-protected or something like that.--93.45.59.26 (talk) 16:03, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- By changing it in the manner that you did you were doing exactly what the TfD aimed to do, against the consensus that the template should be kept. Edit-protection has nothing to do with it. If you want to implement significant changes to any page, whether it be a template or an article, opening a discussion is always the first step. --AussieLegend (talk) 16:31, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- No, I can't agree with you. By editing the template the way I did, the previous structure (the fields, except for a few that had to be edited) remained unchanged, something that obviously couldn't have happened had the template been deleted. Where should I discuss my changes? In the talk page of the template a discussion would go unnoticed for months. But you, what do you think is wrong with my version of Template:Australian state or territory? How is it worse (or better) than the version you reverted to?--93.45.59.26 (talk) 16:40, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- If you want to discuss this, I suggest you open a discussion at Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board --AussieLegend (talk) 16:44, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- I will. But in the end, you reverted because you found something wrong in the template, right? What was it?--93.45.59.26 (talk) 16:48, 25 September 2009 (UTC)