Talk:RK 95 TP: Difference between revisions
m moved Talk:RK 95 TP to Talk:Rk 95 Tp: The designation of the rifle means "Rynnäkkökivääri 95 Taittoperä" rather than "RynnäkköKivääri 95 TaittoPerä", so it should be "Rk 95 Tp" rather than "RK 95 TP". |
|
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 23:09, 27 September 2009
Military history: Technology / Weaponry / European / Nordic Start‑class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Firearms Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
Finland Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Having fired both rk62 and rk95, I can say that along with the better balance, the new improved operating switch (vaihdin in finnish) is a major improvement. The new switch is much faster and also easily operated by the index finger.--Elmeri B. Suokirahvi 20:30, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Assembled 7.62 RK 95 TP.jpg
Image:Assembled 7.62 RK 95 TP.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:06, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Rk95TP Grenade Launcher
The article claims the Rk95 can mount a grenade launcher (HK69A1 presumably). Proof of this? Otherwise shouldn't it be taken out of the article. Rynky (talk) 03:43, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- My published source claims it can mount the M203. Koalorka (talk) 03:53, 29 March 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blood sliver (talk • contribs)
What source is this? I'm not leaning either way, just want to know where the info is coming from. Rynky (talk) 17:13, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- Polish state firearms research institute publication. Koalorka (talk) 20:17, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- Well it's odd then that there are no pictures, and no movements have been made in Finland (as far as I know) to acquire M203s. Rynky (talk) 03:53, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- Start-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- Start-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- Start-Class Nordic military history articles
- Nordic military history task force articles
- Start-Class Firearms articles
- Unknown-importance Firearms articles
- WikiProject Firearms articles
- Unassessed Finland articles
- Unknown-importance Finland articles
- All WikiProject Finland pages