Jump to content

User talk:CloudSurferUK: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 14: Line 14:
You have repeatedly been delting links relating to Pan Am 103, in particular Justiceforlockerbie.com. This website is a source of publication of official reports, information and news regarding the subject of Pan Am Flight 103. Just because you look at a name and make a decision based on that you delete it. The website is 100% relevant to the pages it is posted on so please do not remove it again. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:CloudSurferUK|CloudSurferUK]] ([[User talk:CloudSurferUK|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/CloudSurferUK|contribs]]) 10:39, 26 September 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned2 -->
You have repeatedly been delting links relating to Pan Am 103, in particular Justiceforlockerbie.com. This website is a source of publication of official reports, information and news regarding the subject of Pan Am Flight 103. Just because you look at a name and make a decision based on that you delete it. The website is 100% relevant to the pages it is posted on so please do not remove it again. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:CloudSurferUK|CloudSurferUK]] ([[User talk:CloudSurferUK|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/CloudSurferUK|contribs]]) 10:39, 26 September 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned2 -->
: I don't think I've removed the link from any page. However, there's a section on [[Talk:Pan Am Flight 103|the talk page of the article]] about that link. If you want to keep it in the article permanently, I would strongly recommend to make your case for it there, otherwise another editor will most probably come along and remove it again. Personally, my first intuition is that we shouldn't have it in the external links section since it appears to lead to a biased, non-neutral page (see [[WP:External links]]). Opinions obviously differ though, so please go to [[Talk:Pan Am Flight 103]] and explain what you think.<br>Thank you, [[User talk:Amalthea|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#832">Amalthea</span>]] 10:55, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
: I don't think I've removed the link from any page. However, there's a section on [[Talk:Pan Am Flight 103|the talk page of the article]] about that link. If you want to keep it in the article permanently, I would strongly recommend to make your case for it there, otherwise another editor will most probably come along and remove it again. Personally, my first intuition is that we shouldn't have it in the external links section since it appears to lead to a biased, non-neutral page (see [[WP:External links]]). Opinions obviously differ though, so please go to [[Talk:Pan Am Flight 103]] and explain what you think.<br>Thank you, [[User talk:Amalthea|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#832">Amalthea</span>]] 10:55, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
I owe you an apology as well, I read the contribs wrong. Sorry. :) [[User:CloudSurferUL | CloudSurferUK]]
I owe you an apology as well, I read the contribs wrong. Sorry. :) [[User:CloudSurferUK | CloudSurferUK]]


==AfD for [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boycott Scotland]]==
==AfD for [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boycott Scotland]]==

Revision as of 09:25, 29 September 2009

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, CloudSurferUK, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Amalthea 10:55, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have repeatedly been delting links relating to Pan Am 103, in particular Justiceforlockerbie.com. This website is a source of publication of official reports, information and news regarding the subject of Pan Am Flight 103. Just because you look at a name and make a decision based on that you delete it. The website is 100% relevant to the pages it is posted on so please do not remove it again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CloudSurferUK (talkcontribs) 10:39, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I've removed the link from any page. However, there's a section on the talk page of the article about that link. If you want to keep it in the article permanently, I would strongly recommend to make your case for it there, otherwise another editor will most probably come along and remove it again. Personally, my first intuition is that we shouldn't have it in the external links section since it appears to lead to a biased, non-neutral page (see WP:External links). Opinions obviously differ though, so please go to Talk:Pan Am Flight 103 and explain what you think.
Thank you, Amalthea 10:55, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I owe you an apology as well, I read the contribs wrong. Sorry. :) CloudSurferUK

Please use the standard Articles for Deletion templates here: [1]. TheFeds 21:29, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed it for you. Cheers, Amalthea 21:40, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Amalthea.