Talk:AmeriCorps VISTA: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:32, 29 September 2009

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the AmeriCorps VISTA article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Organizations Start‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This Page Should be moved to AmeriCorps VISTA as that is its proper name -209.181.16.93 (talk) 18:14, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

seeing as these two articles cover the same entity they should probably be merged together--Shimonnyman (talk) 20:18, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. SteveChervitzTrutane (talk) 05:39, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly as written now they are highly duplicative. The only reason I could imagine for two articles is whether they try to cover 1964-1993 and 1993- separately, but I'm not sure there is any good reason to divide things up that way. So I support the merge. Kingdon (talk) 11:32, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Logo

I added the logo so it would be in there I am unaware of the way to make an info box which would be very helpful and would be the ideal place to put the logo I am going to try and figure it out but in the meantime if someone elses knows how before i figurte it out that would be wonderful--Shimonnyman (talk) 20:24, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 seeing as these two articles cover the same entity they should probably be merged together--[[User:Shimonnyman|Shimonnyman]] ([[User talk:Shimonnyman|talk]]) 20:18, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 :I agree. [[User:SteveChervitzTrutane|SteveChervitzTrutane]] ([[User talk:SteveChervitzTrutane|talk]]) 05:39, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
+:Certainly as written now they are highly duplicative.  The only reason I could imagine for two articles is whether they try to cover 1964-1993 and 1993- separately, but I'm not sure there is any good reason to divide things up that way. So I '''support''' the merge. [[User:Kingdon|Kingdon]] ([[User talk:Kingdon|talk]]) 11:32, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 ==Logo==
 I added the logo so it would be in there I am unaware of the way to make an info box which would be very helpful and would be the ideal place to put the logo I am going to try and figure it out but in the meantime if someone elses knows how before i figurte it out that would be wonderful--[[User:Shimonnyman|Shimonnyman]] ([[User talk:Shimonnyman|talk]]) 20:24, 26 August 2009 (UTC)