Talk:Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 06:55, 1 October 2009

Biography Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Paranormal B‑class

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Does this article really need such a comprehensive guide to what she says about chips and mind control? Right now it reads like lots of "facts" with "she says" appended afterwards. This is a person who is obviously quite ill mentally and it's hard to see why these ramblings are relevant for wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.202.209.152 (talk) 18:22, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from Rauni-leena luukanen-kilde for capitalization... totally forgot to check if there was already a page here, hope I didn't overwrite anything... I didn't get any warning and the history shows nothing so I hope I'm good... >_< — flamingspinach | (talk) 20:41, 2005 Jun 10 (UTC)

If you didn't get a warning you were fine. Any chance of indicating if this author is fiction or non-fiction? DJ Clayworth 20:52, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

She is a real person. If you are asking whether she writes fiction, I suppose she genuinely believes the things she writes and talks about. --Lakefall 18:46, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The amount of paranoid schizophrenia is quite high in her writings, we could call her the "David Icke" of Finland. No reptilians, though... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.112.223.124 (talk) 11:12, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kilde's rescue by extraterrestrials

This section could use a lot of work. And the quoted text at the end of this section either needs to get corrected for typos, or have (sic) inserted to show it's not a mistake introduced by the person quoting. Also, a link to the source is needed. --Kristjan Wager 11:16, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is the lady really notorious and well-known for UFO conspiracy stuff? Dr Zak 12:59, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

She is leading UFO activist in Finland. --Zzzzzzzzzz 23:03, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, she is really famous in Finland.

She is also a total nutcase86.40.170.87 (talk) 13:13, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not call people nutcases! Its inappropriate, unprofessional and disrespectful. It also evidences a heavy bias. It implies an assumption that everybody who makes unusual claims and statements must be mad.

Revision as of 18:23, 28 August 2009 edit SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,555,658 edits m Signing comment by 80.202.209.152 - "" ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:55, 1 October 2009 edit undo 77.103.10.67 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 28:		Line 28:

	She is also a total nutcase[[Special:Contributions/86.40.170.87\|86.40.170.87]] ([[User talk:86.40.170.87\|talk]]) 13:13, 5 July 2009 (UTC)		She is also a total nutcase[[Special:Contributions/86.40.170.87\|86.40.170.87]] ([[User talk:86.40.170.87\|talk]]) 13:13, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

			Please do not call people nutcases! Its inappropriate, unprofessional and disrespectful. It also evidences a heavy bias. It implies an assumption that everybody who makes unusual claims and statements must be mad.