Jump to content

User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 39: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by Cavegirl20 to last revision by NawlinWiki (HG)
No edit summary
Line 47: Line 47:


*Because it didn't assert that the company was notable per [[WP:CORP]] (doing work for notable clients doesn't make you notable). The three sources cited were the company's own website (twice) and what appears to be a PR release. [[User:NawlinWiki|NawlinWiki]] ([[User talk:NawlinWiki#top|talk]]) 20:58, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
*Because it didn't assert that the company was notable per [[WP:CORP]] (doing work for notable clients doesn't make you notable). The three sources cited were the company's own website (twice) and what appears to be a PR release. [[User:NawlinWiki|NawlinWiki]] ([[User talk:NawlinWiki#top|talk]]) 20:58, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

ZURB does comply with [[WR:CORP]]. There are a number of credible third party sources which have reviewed ZURB, here are just some:

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/172474/zurb_launches_notable_web_service_and_iphone_app.html
http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/09/23/collaborate-on-web-docs-now-collaborate-on-web-designs-with-notable/
http://www.macworld.com/article/142951/2009/09/notable.html

Can we list the proper references on the article?

Revision as of 21:29, 2 October 2009

This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

Do you think some salt would be appropriate? Also, could you give me the names of the recent recreators so I can check for similar-named article creation? Thanks. Bongomatic 01:02, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks & cheers, Bongomatic 01:10, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you kidding me?

Why would you delete my Retro Fox page! It deserve's to be on this website.

Dante3000 aka Richard Verducci

I know I haven't made many Wiki entries, however, after 100 podcasts over so many years and a rich background, after deleting my page seconds after it was created... I think you're taking your job a little /too/ seriously.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Hand of Despair (talkcontribs) 01:35, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply] 

Hi there Nawlin. I saw you said that Runescape help for newbies was an expired PROD in your deletion reason, but I'd only added the PROD tag a few minutes before, and it looked like a user was attempting to contest the deletion. Although you also said it was spam/advertising (WP:CSD#G11), which would overrule the PROD, except from I can't recall seeing anything on the page which sounded like spam. Although that is from memory. Best, - Kingpin13 (talk) 16:51, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, just noticed that Zurb wikipedia page was deleted. Can you state the reason? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.144.253.52 (talk) 18:17, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Because it didn't assert that the company was notable per WP:CORP (doing work for notable clients doesn't make you notable). The three sources cited were the company's own website (twice) and what appears to be a PR release. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:58, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ZURB does comply with WR:CORP. There are a number of credible third party sources which have reviewed ZURB, here are just some:

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/172474/zurb_launches_notable_web_service_and_iphone_app.html http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/09/23/collaborate-on-web-docs-now-collaborate-on-web-designs-with-notable/ http://www.macworld.com/article/142951/2009/09/notable.html

Can we list the proper references on the article?