User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 39: Difference between revisions
Javierito92 (talk | contribs) m Reverted edits by Cavegirl20 to last revision by NawlinWiki (HG) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
*Because it didn't assert that the company was notable per [[WP:CORP]] (doing work for notable clients doesn't make you notable). The three sources cited were the company's own website (twice) and what appears to be a PR release. [[User:NawlinWiki|NawlinWiki]] ([[User talk:NawlinWiki#top|talk]]) 20:58, 2 October 2009 (UTC) |
*Because it didn't assert that the company was notable per [[WP:CORP]] (doing work for notable clients doesn't make you notable). The three sources cited were the company's own website (twice) and what appears to be a PR release. [[User:NawlinWiki|NawlinWiki]] ([[User talk:NawlinWiki#top|talk]]) 20:58, 2 October 2009 (UTC) |
||
ZURB does comply with [[WR:CORP]]. There are a number of credible third party sources which have reviewed ZURB, here are just some: |
|||
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/172474/zurb_launches_notable_web_service_and_iphone_app.html |
|||
http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/09/23/collaborate-on-web-docs-now-collaborate-on-web-designs-with-notable/ |
|||
http://www.macworld.com/article/142951/2009/09/notable.html |
|||
Can we list the proper references on the article? |
Revision as of 21:29, 2 October 2009
This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.
Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first.
Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.
Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).
Do you think some salt would be appropriate? Also, could you give me the names of the recent recreators so I can check for similar-named article creation? Thanks. Bongomatic 01:02, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- I've salted -- I checked the other two users who created this page, and they haven't done anything else bad. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 01:04, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks & cheers, Bongomatic 01:10, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Are you kidding me?
Why would you delete my Retro Fox page! It deserve's to be on this website.
- Not if it doesn't assert notability per WP:CORP, it doesn't. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:16, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- How about you help me out by doing that for me instead? TheFoxIsBack (talk) 01:21, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- No, as the proponent of the article, that's your job. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:21, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Dante3000 aka Richard Verducci
I know I haven't made many Wiki entries, however, after 100 podcasts over so many years and a rich background, after deleting my page seconds after it was created... I think you're taking your job a little /too/ seriously.
- See WP:BIO and WP:V - lots of people have 100 podcasts. You need to show that this person has been recognized as notable by independent sources. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:31, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- I hardly see the New York Times covering this guy. I think you're biased. I'll find something about him getting a key to the city or whatever is sufficient for you to deem him worthy.
- He's a contributor to the Urban Dictionary - http://www.urbandictionary.com/author.php?author=Dante3000
- I found him featured on http://www.suburbanhomerecords.com/category/drunk-dial-hotline/page/2/
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Hand of Despair (talk • contribs) 01:35, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- Anyone can contribute to Urban Dictionary, and the second source is a blog. You should read WP:RS to see what sources are considered reliable. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:43, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi there Nawlin. I saw you said that Runescape help for newbies was an expired PROD in your deletion reason, but I'd only added the PROD tag a few minutes before, and it looked like a user was attempting to contest the deletion. Although you also said it was spam/advertising (WP:CSD#G11), which would overrule the PROD, except from I can't recall seeing anything on the page which sounded like spam. Although that is from memory. Best, - Kingpin13 (talk) 16:51, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- The user was trying to advertise her Runescape site, which she had also created a separate article for. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:53, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- Ah I see, I saw on the user's talk page that you had deleted another page, but I didn't get a chance to look at it. By the way, do you think you could let the IP address who commented on Talk:Runescape help for newbies that I have replied on Emily ht's talk page (they are almost certainly the same person, but better safe then sorry). I'd do so myself, but again, I can't see who it was. Thanks - Kingpin13 (talk) 16:57, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- Copied the comments to the IP talk page. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:00, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks Nawlin - Kingpin13 (talk) 17:02, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello, just noticed that Zurb wikipedia page was deleted. Can you state the reason? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.144.253.52 (talk) 18:17, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- Because it didn't assert that the company was notable per WP:CORP (doing work for notable clients doesn't make you notable). The three sources cited were the company's own website (twice) and what appears to be a PR release. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:58, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
ZURB does comply with WR:CORP. There are a number of credible third party sources which have reviewed ZURB, here are just some:
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/172474/zurb_launches_notable_web_service_and_iphone_app.html http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/09/23/collaborate-on-web-docs-now-collaborate-on-web-designs-with-notable/ http://www.macworld.com/article/142951/2009/09/notable.html
Can we list the proper references on the article?