Talk:Plug In Baby: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:28, 4 October 2009

Songs Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Rock music Unassessed

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Second Paragraph

Mere speculation, if anyone can find some references for the claims that's fine, otherwise the paragraph should be deleted. mode_seven 17:27, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is Matt Bellamy really addicted to porn?

I don't think so. It's just speculation, maybe one should delete it. --Nr. 213-140-22-64 17:51, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as nothing's happened over the last five months, I'm going to remove it. Mark ^(Talk) 16:40, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Genre

Due to the ongoing disputes about which genre Muse's music falls into I think it'd be safest just to describe them as a "rock band", as that can hardly be challenged. 81.23.56.53 (talk) 20:23, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've made the alteration. Pretty sure it should be okay. Can always be reverted if not. I just struggle to think of PiB as a "prog" song. 81.23.56.53 (talk) 20:25, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move?

It has been proposed in this section that Plug In Baby be renamed and moved to Plug in Baby.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Plug In Baby → Plug in Baby — — caps — —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:03, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalizing "in" likely depends on detailed examination of the song's lyrics to find whether the "in" is a preposition ("plug into the baby") or an adverb ("a baby which is plugged in"). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:28, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 :I've made the alteration. Pretty sure it should be okay. Can always be reverted if not. I just struggle to think of PiB as a "prog" song. [[Special:Contributions/81.23.56.53|81.23.56.53]] ([[User talk:81.23.56.53|talk]]) 20:25, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
+== Move? ==
+{{movereq|Plug in Baby}}
+[[:Plug In Baby]] → [[Plug in Baby]] — — caps — —[[User:Koavf|Justin (koavf)]]❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯ 20:03, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
+*Capitalizing "in" likely depends on detailed examination of the song's lyrics to find whether the "in" is a preposition ("plug into the baby") or an adverb ("a baby which is plugged in"). [[User:Anthony Appleyard|Anthony Appleyard]] ([[User talk:Anthony Appleyard|talk]]) 22:28, 4 October 2009 (UTC)