Talk:Misandry: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Tagging, Removed: |nested=yes (2), using AWB |
No edit summary |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
{{notforum|misandry}} |
{{notforum|misandry}} |
||
__TOC__ |
__TOC__ |
||
==Equal rights== |
|||
Hi, I made the first two paragraphs of this page more comparable to the female version ([[misogyny]]), since Wikipedia articles are not supposed to be in favor of one sex over the other. |
Revision as of 01:53, 6 October 2009
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Misandry article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This article was nominated for deletion on April 21st, 2006. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
2006: 1|2|3 2009: 6 |
Misandry received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about misandry. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about misandry at the Reference desk. |
Equal rights
Hi, I made the first two paragraphs of this page more comparable to the female version (misogyny), since Wikipedia articles are not supposed to be in favor of one sex over the other.