Talk:North-West University: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Purple Duke (talk | contribs) |
Purple Duke (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== History == |
== History == |
||
I find that the focus of this section is on the Puk, while the merger partner, University of North West, is ignored. This section seems biased and should be incorporate the institutions shared history. |
I find that the focus of this section is on the Puk, while the merger partner, University of North West, is ignored. This section seems biased and should be incorporate the institutions shared history.'''[[User:Purple Duke|<span style="font-variant:small-caps; color: #32127A">Purple</span>]][[User talk:Purple Duke|<span style="font-variant:small-caps; color: #7BA05B">Duke </span>]]''' 17:45, 13 October 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:45, 13 October 2009
Higher education Stub‑class | |||||||
|
Ranking
The article stated that NWU's poor ranking performance compared to Uct, Maties and Tuks was due to its smaller student numbers. This is rubbish as NWU has a large student population and there is little correlation between student size and performance. Just look at Brown. I removed this statement. Any objections? 18:27, 15 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.18.208.162 (talk)
History
I find that the focus of this section is on the Puk, while the merger partner, University of North West, is ignored. This section seems biased and should be incorporate the institutions shared history.PurpleDuke 17:45, 13 October 2009 (UTC)