Jump to content

Talk:North-West University: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 7: Line 7:
== History ==
== History ==


I find that the focus of this section is on the Puk, while the merger partner, University of North West, is ignored. This section seems biased and should be incorporate the institutions shared history.
I find that the focus of this section is on the Puk, while the merger partner, University of North West, is ignored. This section seems biased and should be incorporate the institutions shared history.'''[[User:Purple Duke|<span style="font-variant:small-caps; color: #32127A">Purple</span>]][[User talk:Purple Duke|<span style="font-variant:small-caps; color: #7BA05B">Duke </span>]]''' 17:45, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:45, 13 October 2009

WikiProject iconHigher education Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Ranking

The article stated that NWU's poor ranking performance compared to Uct, Maties and Tuks was due to its smaller student numbers. This is rubbish as NWU has a large student population and there is little correlation between student size and performance. Just look at Brown. I removed this statement. Any objections? 18:27, 15 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.18.208.162 (talk)

History

I find that the focus of this section is on the Puk, while the merger partner, University of North West, is ignored. This section seems biased and should be incorporate the institutions shared history.PurpleDuke 17:45, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]