Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Williamwells: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Creating new discussion for Williamwells. (TW) |
SPCUClerkbot (talk | contribs) BOT updates, actions follow: (listing accounts notified) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
{{SPIcat}} |
{{SPIcat}} |
||
;Suspected sockpuppets <!-- BOTDONE_USER_NOTICE DO_NOT_MODIFY [[Williamwells]][[Scottolini]] (THIS CURRENTLY IS NOT ACTIVE, this comment is for testing only) --> |
|||
;Suspected sockpuppets |
|||
* {{checkuser|1=Scottolini}} |
* {{checkuser|1=Scottolini}} |
||
Revision as of 03:26, 15 October 2009
Williamwells
Williamwells (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Williamwells/Archive.
Report date October 15 2009, 03:26 (UTC)
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Scottolini (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Evidence submitted by Hell In A Bucket (talk)
writing the same bull article. Shaggybevo Hell In A Bucket (talk) 03:26, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
- Comments by accused parties See Defending yourself against claims.
- Comments by other users
- CheckUser requests
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: F (Other reason )
- Current status –
Awaiting initial clerk review. Requested by Hell In A Bucket (talk) 03:26, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
- Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
- Conclusions