The Other Canon Foundation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== Differences to and criticism of the mainstream economics == |
== Differences to and criticism of the mainstream economics == |
||
Much of The Others Canon's criticism of the mainstream economics regards the focus on equilibrium (based on models form physics) and the static as well as what the neoclassical models takes as given (perfect information, perfect foresight, [[ |
Much of The Others Canon's criticism of the mainstream economics regards the focus on equilibrium (based on models form physics) and the static as well as what the neoclassical models takes as given (perfect information, perfect foresight, constant or decreasing [[returns to scale]] and no diversity/likeness of economic activity). Conforming with Schumpeterian theory The Other Canon emphasises the constant change in the economy and that capitalists all the time create temporary monopolies based on advantages of knowledge and/or uncertain assumptions about the future. The fact that mainstream economics sees innovation and novelty, and hence growth (of which capitalism is absolutely dependent), as exogenous phenomena does not fall lightly with The Other Canon who sees these factors as pivotal to the economy and something that is maximised through stimulation in the form of state policy. |
||
The view of the economy as largely independent from society and the financial sector not beeing distinct from the real economy are also disputed by The Other Canon claiming that the economy is indeed embedded into society and that conflicts between the financial sector are normal and hence must be regulated.<ref>http://www.othercanon.org/papers/organisation.html</ref> |
The view of the economy as largely independent from society and the financial sector not beeing distinct from the real economy are also disputed by The Other Canon claiming that the economy is indeed embedded into society and that conflicts between the financial sector are normal and hence must be regulated.<ref>http://www.othercanon.org/papers/organisation.html</ref> |
||
Revision as of 21:08, 17 October 2009
The Other Canon is a center and network for research of heterodox economics founded by Erik Reinert. The name refers to the founders' message of there being another economic canon, alternative to the ruling neoclassical economics. Their suggestions, they claim, are valid for and can be applicated in the first, second and third world. [1]
History
The Other Canon was founded in 2000 by Erik Reinert and 10 co-founders with different backgrounds in economics and social sciences. The founders also have distinct backgrounds coming from North America, Latin America, Asia, Eastern and Western Europe. Noteable names among them are Wolfgang Drechsler, Carlota Perez and Geoffrey Hodgson. In addition to the executive chairman Erik Reinert and the earlier mentioned Drechsler, the current executive board also employes Rainer Kattel.[2]
Theories and influences
The idelogical fundation of The Other Canon is not defined in a left-right perspective, claiming both sides have fallen into the same traps failing to explain and develop valid theories for today's economics[3]. Central to the group is the Theory of Uneven Development, which aims to explain how and why the international economic landscape (of rich and poor nations) is as it is today. History of Economic Policy is used as an important tool in this process. [4]
The Other Canon is highly eclectic and gathers ideas from many authors of various epochs. Joseph Schumpeter, John Maynard Keynes, Karl Marx, Gunnar Myrdal, Gustav von Schmoller, Werner Sombart, Nicholas Kaldor, Max Weber and Adam Smith (for considerations of the primary sector) are among the theorists to have influenced The Other Canon.
In accordance with Schumpeter, The Other Canon emphasizes the role of "man the producer" over "man the consumer" and intends to seek the reasons for growth and innovation rather than seeing it as something innate to capital and a simple result of adding it to human labour. They argue that the state is needed to stimulate entrepreneurship to maximise growth. [5] The importance of role of the state is also underlined in development economics. In his book How Rich Countries Got Rich ... and Why Poor Countries Stay Poor (2007), Reinert criticises liberal economists for ignoring empirical evidence when they promote free-trade as the solution to third world countries. He claims poor countries should, and shoud be allowed to, use protectionism to build up their own industries until they can compete internationally and that the state should be involved in this process.[6]
Differences to and criticism of the mainstream economics
Much of The Others Canon's criticism of the mainstream economics regards the focus on equilibrium (based on models form physics) and the static as well as what the neoclassical models takes as given (perfect information, perfect foresight, constant or decreasing returns to scale and no diversity/likeness of economic activity). Conforming with Schumpeterian theory The Other Canon emphasises the constant change in the economy and that capitalists all the time create temporary monopolies based on advantages of knowledge and/or uncertain assumptions about the future. The fact that mainstream economics sees innovation and novelty, and hence growth (of which capitalism is absolutely dependent), as exogenous phenomena does not fall lightly with The Other Canon who sees these factors as pivotal to the economy and something that is maximised through stimulation in the form of state policy. The view of the economy as largely independent from society and the financial sector not beeing distinct from the real economy are also disputed by The Other Canon claiming that the economy is indeed embedded into society and that conflicts between the financial sector are normal and hence must be regulated.[7]
References
- ^ http://www.othercanon.org/papers/organisation.html
- ^ http://www.othercanon.org/board/index.html
- ^ Canon 11 99.doc The Other Canon - Reconstructing the Theory of Uneven Economic Development
- ^ http://www.othercanon.org/documenting/index.html
- ^ Erik Reinert. The Role of the State in Economic Growth
- ^ Erik Reinert. How Rich Countries Got Rich ... and Why Poor Countries Stay Poor (2007), London: Constable.
- ^ http://www.othercanon.org/papers/organisation.html