Jump to content

User talk:ReformatMe: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
EdwardsBot (talk | contribs)
354,693 edits
EdwardsBot (talk | contribs)
354,693 edits
Line 190: Line 190:
{{colend}}
{{colend}}
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">'''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' &middot; [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Single|Single-page]] &middot; [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] &middot; [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 04:19, 13 October 2009 (UTC)</div>
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">'''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' &middot; [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Single|Single-page]] &middot; [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] &middot; [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 04:19, 13 October 2009 (UTC)</div>

== ''The Wikipedia Signpost'': 19 October 2009 ==

<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2; ">
* News and notes: [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-10-19/News and notes|WikiReader, Meetup in Pakistan, Audit committee elections, and more]]
* In the news: [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-10-19/In the news|Sanger controversy reignited, Limbaugh libelled, and more]]
* Discussion report: [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-10-19/Discussion report|Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations]]
* Features and admins: [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-10-19/Features and admins|Approved this week]]
* Arbitration report: [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-10-19/Arbitration report|The Report on Lengthy Litigation]]
* Technology report: [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-10-19/Technology report|Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News]]
</div>
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">'''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' &middot; [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Single|Single-page]] &middot; [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] &middot; [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 03:31, 20 October 2009 (UTC)</div>

Revision as of 03:31, 20 October 2009

Coldwater

Thanks for your note. The disambiguation page is about the term "Coldwater", not "Cold Water". It seems trivial, but the sole purpose of a disambiguation page is to guide people to the correct page when an article has an incorrect link. My thinking is that song or book titles (if I remember correctly what I deleted) that are "Cold Water" will not be mis-linked as Coldwater and should not therefore be competing for attention on the dab page with more likely hits. If you have found articles that link to Coldwater but are meant to be "Cold Water [something]", then certainly you could restore those links.--Ken Gallager (talk) 12:40, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looking into it further, I see that Cold Water redirects to Coldwater. I will restore the items I deleted and make it clearer that both terms are covered. Thanks again for getting in touch. --Ken Gallager (talk) 12:48, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your rollback request

I reviewed your rollback request. Although you don't have many edits or reverts, the ones I reviewed seemed okay, and you seem to recognize vandalism correctly. As such, I've granted your account rollback. Just remember that rolblack should be used to revert vandalism, and that misuse of the tool, either by using it to revert edits you disagree with or to revert-war with other users, can lead to it being removed...sometimes without warning. For practice you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback.

Thank you also for the good wishes. :) Yes, my day so far has been a pleasant one. I hope your day is equally as nice. Acalamari 22:24, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Anytime;) Thanks for the recognition, and if you want...feel free to visit my userpage, view it and sign the questbook. Happy Editing:D--SchnitzelMannGreek. 23:57, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 29 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:24, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 July 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Northants

Hi there as a someone from Wellingborough (but live in London) I've made a Proposal for WikiProject Northants at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Northamptonshire as some from who lives in Wellingborough I throught you may be interested, please say if you support the idea on the Proposal page. Likelife (talk) 10:56, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support, I have now made the WikiProject but it needs improving!, if you would be kind enough to help that would be great. :Wikipedia:WikiProject Northamptonshire. Likelife (talk) 12:34, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 July 2009

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 12:32, 28 July 2009 (UTC) [reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 3 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 05:48, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Northamptonshire

Hi ReformatMe! A Top Priority article you have been involved with has many issues and urgently needs improving. If you can help with these issues please see Talk:Northamptonshire, address the different points if you can, and leave any comments there. (This is a generic message. if it has been placed on your talk page inadvertantly, please ignore it.) --Kudpung --Kudpung (talk) 22:57, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 10 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 05:10, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 17 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:45, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 24 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:11, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009

File source problem with File:Klashnekoff.jpg

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Klashnekoff.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:10, 28 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 11:10, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009

Conflict of interest template change

Hello ReformatMe, I honestly am not sure what you were trying to do at the COI guideline, but the reason for the template at the top is because WP:CONFLICT redirects to the COI guideline and someone trying to get to WP:EC or WP:DR might end up at COI by mistake. I don't know why you were changing the template informing people of the redirect, but I wanted to explain why it's there. Thanks! -- Atama頭 21:54, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, by the time I left this message you had fixed it back so my message wasn't even necessary. For another editor (one with a bad edit history or a newbie) I might have left a template warning about experimenting but you're an established editor with a good record and I assumed you had a good reason for what you did. Thanks for getting back to me! -- Atama頭 22:00, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ReformatMe&oldid=320938611"