Talk:Republicanism in Morocco: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
cpedit |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The title as it is incorrect encyclopedically and is misleading. It should represent the content! Cheers -- [[User:FayssalF|Svest]] 02:05, 20 December 2005 (UTC) <small>[[User talk:FayssalF|<font style="background: orange"> <sup>''Wiki me up™''</sup></font>]]</small> |
The title as it is incorrect encyclopedically and is misleading. It should represent the content! Cheers -- [[User:FayssalF|Svest]] 02:05, 20 December 2005 (UTC) <small>[[User talk:FayssalF|<font style="background: orange"> <sup>''Wiki me up™''</sup></font>]]</small> |
||
:I agree, this page should be deleted. If necessary, a list of insurrections in Morocco, or something like that, could fill its place. [[User:Arre|Arre]] 12:40, 20 December 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:40, 20 December 2005
Title
The title is totally misleading. The page should be moved to another title. The is no term whatsoever called Republic of Morocco. The Moors story is about the Bou regrag area; the Rifis' story was about the Republic of Rif and Oufkir's was a failed attempt. It was the only attempt.
The title as it is incorrect encyclopedically and is misleading. It should represent the content! Cheers -- Svest 02:05, 20 December 2005 (UTC) Wiki me up™
- I agree, this page should be deleted. If necessary, a list of insurrections in Morocco, or something like that, could fill its place. Arre 12:40, 20 December 2005 (UTC)