User talk:ArglebargleIV

Permanent link archiving :

• Archive 1, through January 31, 2007
• Archive 2, through June 10, 2007
• Archive 3, through September 24, 2007
• Archive 4, through December 17, 2007
• Archive 5, through July 6, 2008
• Archive 6, through December 29, 2008
• Archive 7, through March 22, 2009
• Archive 8, through July 21, 2009

Please add new comments at the bottom of this page, and sign them.
Although Wikipedia itself is not censored, I reserve the right to delete offensive obscenity and deliberately disruptive edits. If you're just complaining about me, though, I'll leave it on here, I've nothing to hide. (Except my real name, of course.) -- ArglebargleIV 22:35, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Prod2 for Khumalo Derivative

I was actually writing that as a prod, you just beat me to the Save button! eaolson (talk) 00:58, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Concerning Seiken Densetsu 3 (What would've been Secret of Mana 2) in the Emulation article

It's funny, there is already a detailed article about the game on Wikipedia, but it seems like talking about it in the SNES or Emulation articles is forbidden because everytime I try to add it, it gets erased. That's kinda lame... and yeah, I am kind of a n00b when it comes to editing at Wikipedia (more used to ED), but thanks for atleast trying to help, though some snoot will probably end up deleting it again... - Kitsune_Baka —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.20.160.94 (talk) 14:42, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

From an anonymous editor

You seem to be an expert on everything, wow smart guy I wish I had your intelliegence, from Mormons, to science, to masturbating, to physics, to philosophy, good lord, everybody wished they where as smart as you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.226.61.204 (talk) 16:35, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

From User:Hendaj

I don't know who you are, and I don't care. I'm doing what the Wikipedia Bot told me to do. Take it up with them/it. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hendaj (talk • contribs) 02:12, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Britney Spears Songs

Why you removed the content on List of Britney Spears songs?? The discography page doesn't mention existence of some b-sides or leaked songs and much of the songs aren't mentioned anywhere, not even on the albums page, so why??! PlatinumFire (talk) 19:05, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Blobble

Hello, ArglebargleIV. You have new messages at RadioFan's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TDAS

Total Drama Action Scandal... don't delete it... just give me a good name for it instead of scandal.

--Delfino12 (talk) 21:13, 14 August 2009 (UTC) ->

Morefar Back O’Beyond

I object to deletion. My reasons are on the talk page of the article. Paul, in Saudi (talk) 20:52, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Ivica Bednjanec page?

"17:50, 18 January 2009 Jimfbleak (talk | contribs) deleted "Ivica Bednjanec" ‎ (A7: Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject)"

"A page you created, Ivica Bednjanec, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. ArglebargleIV (talk) 17:28, 18 January 2009 (UTC)"

Can you explain me why did you delete mentioned page?

For your information, Ivica Bednjanec is one of the greatest (if not the greatest) Croatian comic author. Mr. Bednjanec is also one of the greatest designers at Croatia, and so on. He is complete author of (scenario, drawing and color) of most (99%) of his works, and here we are talking about of thousands (!) of original artwork "sheets". This is impressive in world measures...

I was not the author of that page; I think team of Croatian Wikipedia did that. I just made some factographic corrections to page. However, I demand explanation of your act. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BornDark (talk • contribs) 16:51, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

• Responding on your talk page. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 19:26, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Removal of PROD from IABF

Hello ArglebargleIV, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to IABF has been removed. It was removed by 72.147.206.82 with the following edit summary '(no edit summary)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with 72.147.206.82 before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to take part in the article's current AfD. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 02:46, 30 August 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)

Removal of PROD from Contractor combatant

Hello ArglebargleIV, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Contractor combatant has been removed. It was removed by Gingerbreadman7 with the following edit summary '(This is not test material. This is the actual encyclopedia article. There is NOT supposed to be a duplicate @ Transwiki:Contractor combatant .)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Gingerbreadman7 before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 00:36, 3 September 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)

POV problems, Soapbox-ing at Death panel

The lead section of Death panel, which you have contributed to, currently contains content that misrepresents the origin of the term "Death panel", and provides a misleading summary of an article by Nangia and Wilson in Foreign Policy. Most of the problematic content appears to have been added by an editor or editors at IP 209.6.238.201, possibly in violation of WP:SOAP. I am calling on contributors to the page to revisit this issue and either come to a consensus on the proper content, or propose it for deletion. Cnilep (talk) 16:10, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Carly Fiorina

Thank you for stepping into the breach at Carly Fiorina earlier. I've made a request for comment here, utilizing your sourcing, and I'm hoping you'll consider sharing your thoughts, again, there. Thanks, in advance. user:J aka justen (talk) 21:38, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Ramanujan

I understand that you are an Indian and that you are proud of it, but please keep your ego out of wikipedia, putting other indians' biased and egocentric views on another indian is pointless, your pride only hinders you here in a place of knowledge. We do not need biased opinions from nobody's and neverwas' like your self and the nobody's you quote. The truth is Ramanujan was a nobody who contributed very little to the field of mathematics and had almost no natural talent for mathematics other than his extensive knowledge of continued fractions, and the only reason you know of him is because of a movie written by two americans called 'good will hunting'. I suggest you take ramanujan's balls out of your mouth and realize he accomplished nothing just like you and most indians. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.179.25.154 (talk) 15:51, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

• I have responded at your talk page. --- ArglebargleIV (talk) 16:21, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Your edits were reverted

Hi, I thought I'd let you know that your edits to Vokkaliga were reverted by someone else. I considered undoing them, but thought I should let you know about this first. BashBrannigan (talk) 02:07, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, ArglebargleIV. You have new messages at Drilnoth's talk page.
Message added 22:31, 15 October 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

–Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:31, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Help

ArglebargleIV, could you please help me with the table in List of Martha Speaks episodes, i have no clue what went wrong. _{TCK| chat} 14:18, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Yes, thanks, i haven't had time in my busy schedule to edit Wikipedia for months and i'm starting to forget how the site works. _{TCK| chat} 13

57, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Judith Keppel

You recently reverted my edits to the page I cite in the above title, stating that I introduced "negative or controversial biographical material without providing a reliable source". How does one actually provide a reliable source regarding broadcast media? Since to do so one would have to provide hours worth of video, the only realistic way is via the observations of the audience. It's blatantly obvious to anyone that watches this show that what I wrote was accurate, not only from her success ratio in challenge rounds and the lack of conference from other team members when she's in the final round, but also from the frequent looks of exasperation on the faces of the rest of the team when she gets easy questions wrong! To construe what I wrote as negative or controversial is therefore ridiculous, as it is obviously true via observation. CrackDragon (talk) 23:28, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

As an addendum to my above comments, I serendipitously watched this show again this evening, and all my observations were once again borne out. This leaves me with severe misgivings about Wikipedia's policy on disallowing material that can't be cited from other sources. All free thought and original material is therefore taboo. If Issac Newton had published his Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, the most brilliant scientific work ever formulated by an individual, on Wikipedia, it would have been deleted due to lack of references. All material derived from first principles is therefore garbage as far as this site is concerned.

Whilst I'm ranting, have you ever thought about becoming a Traffic Warden in the UK? That would hand you even more of the pedantic power to antagonise others you appear to crave, allowing you to realise your full officious, bureaucratic potential! CrackDragon (talk) 19:35, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

• "I'm not trying to antagonize you, I'm just telling you what the situation is. And please cut the insults"

Simmer down, I was only kidding! Since you claim to be a "punctuation stickler" I'd have thought the exclamation mark at the end of my leg-pull would have alluded to the playful nature of my comment. CrackDragon (talk) 21:43, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Awards

If you really feel that way then you should take down all the Wikipedia awards on your user page -- kind of a double standard, and you are not a decorated military veteran. Think about it. 166.70.238.46 (talk) 00:36, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

• Responded on your talk page. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 00:43, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Filing complaint under BLP against you -- personal vendetta clearly. 166.70.238.46 (talk) 00:53, 25 October 2009 (UTC)