Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holistic law: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:29, 21 December 2005

Non-notable topic, part of a series of vanity/advert articles posted by this user to promote his book & law practice. Klaw ¡digame! 17:41, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete advertising. IMO, a neologistic claim of morality for an inherently amoral profession. --Fire Star 21:09, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for all the above reasons plus those I have stated at User_talk:Bapu. --Coolcaesar 06:31, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this and other spam from Bapu as well. Pavel Vozenilek 08:39, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Stifle 02:07, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no credible sources on which an article could be written redstucco 09:29, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 *'''Delete''' this and other spam from Bapu as well. [[User:Pavel Vozenilek|Pavel Vozenilek]] 08:39, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] 02:07, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' no credible sources on which an article could be written [[User:Red stucco|<span style="color:red">red</span><span style="color:black">stucco</span>]] 09:29, 21 December 2005 (UTC)