Jump to content

Talk:Faà di Bruno's formula: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 18: Line 18:


:: Not really. My edit was just reformatting of that reference. But originally it was [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Fa%C3%A0_di_Bruno%27s_formula&diff=prev&oldid=34308920 introduced] by you in 2006. Anyway, I don't see any problem with it. [[User:Maxal|Maxal]] ([[User talk:Maxal|talk]]) 14:43, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
:: Not really. My edit was just reformatting of that reference. But originally it was [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Fa%C3%A0_di_Bruno%27s_formula&diff=prev&oldid=34308920 introduced] by you in 2006. Anyway, I don't see any problem with it. [[User:Maxal|Maxal]] ([[User talk:Maxal|talk]]) 14:43, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

: So this is one of those. I no longer remember which is which. [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] ([[User talk:Michael Hardy|talk]]) 00:53, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:53, 2 November 2009

It would be useful to know more about the Faa di Bruno polynomials. They seem to be known as Faber polynomials although F di B's precedence is assured.

John McKay

129.199.98.69 06:27, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Error in "explicite example"

The number of derivative-symbols for f',f, f' seems to be messy. ~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Druseltal2005 (talkcontribs) 08:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possible conflict of interest

Is the User:Michael Hardy who started this article and has been a prolific contributor to it any relation to the Michael Hardy whose paper in Electronic Journal of Combinatorics is reference [1]? Dewey process (talk) 22:34, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The same. Apparently that was put there in this edit. Michael Hardy (talk) 00:07, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not really. My edit was just reformatting of that reference. But originally it was introduced by you in 2006. Anyway, I don't see any problem with it. Maxal (talk) 14:43, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
So this is one of those. I no longer remember which is which. Michael Hardy (talk) 00:53, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]