User talk:The Squicks

This page is being watched over by the Toby to prevent negative thoughts. Please. Join Us.

AfD nomination of List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Michael Yon

The article Michael Yon you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Michael Yon for things needed to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:18, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Jackson Jive

I've left a few observations regarding the Jackson Jive at Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board#The Jackson Jive, following your request there. -- saberwyn 05:54, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. The Squicks (talk) 22:54, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Re: Talk:Glenn Beck

Not sure why the page is on my watchlist: I must've reverted some vandalism to the page at some point in the past. At any rate, if that sort of thing appears again -- whether in an article, talk page or user talk page makes no difference -- it calls for aggressive instant removal. Cheers! --Rrburke^(talk) 00:44, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

aggressive instant removal My feelings precisely! The Squicks (talk) 05:53, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Chuck Grassley

Your opinions during the whole RFC were well on target. There was no reason for that information to be added, especially because it would turn out that the user had a history of sockpuppetry and pov edits. Richard (talk) 10:53, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Don't worry, sooner or later that user's personal history will catch up with him. The Squicks (talk) 23:38, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

What the heck does that comment about me in the Edit Summary refer to?

I am puzzled. Enlighten me.--Hauskalainen (talk) 23:58, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Which comment? I've edited Wikipedia continuously in the past several weeks. The Squicks (talk) 23:59, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Evangelical Christian Bigotry

Stop editing and creating pages with your biased ways you bigot. I feel you should just quit wikipedia as every move you make is knowingly or unknowingly biased and skewed. Don't even bother to reply to me, just get off wikipedia and learn about how to present information in a neutral way.