Jump to content

Talk:Sugar Hill Historic District (Detroit): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
rm move request template - page has been moved
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject National Register of Historic Places|class=Stub}}
{{WikiProject National Register of Historic Places|class=Stub}}
{{WikiProject Michigan|class=Stub|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Michigan|class=Stub|importance=Low|detroit=yes}}


==Requested move==
==Requested move==

Revision as of 19:22, 3 November 2009

WikiProject iconNational Register of Historic Places Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMichigan: Detroit Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Detroit task force.

Requested move

I request move from "Sugar Hill Historic District" to "Sugar Hill Historic District (Detroit, Michigan)" to make way for disambiguation. There is at least one other Sugar Hill Historic District, in New York City. Someone has somehow prevented the move by protecting the destination name; i didn't know that could be done (how can it be done, by the way?). I have no knowledge of the Michigan one being primary, so expect these two are equal in importance, and then its the right thing to do, to use the un-parenthesesed name for disambiguation of these two and any others. doncram (talk) 01:20, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NRHP info says the Michigan one was built later (in 1946 while the New York one was built in 1865) and also that it was listed on the NRHP later (2003 vs. 2002). doncram (talk) 01:45, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
An obvious move. I don't think this should be in any way controversial, and suggest it be listed as such at Wikipedia:Requested Moves. Andrew Jameson (talk) 17:09, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]