Talk:Fishstick: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 09:41, 4 November 2009

Food and drink Redirect‑class Low‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink

Redirect

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

WPFood Assessment

Low importance C-Class article about a single fish product that is not a major contribution to American, Canadian or British cuisine. --Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 00:07, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you underestimate the importance of fish fingers, sir. 193.164.143.242 (talk) 13:45, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, Fish Fingers contribute massively to British cuisine. Mat (talk) 14:25, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

British or American?

This article should really be called 'Fish finger' as opposed to 'Fishstick' if it was invented in the United Kingdom. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gokfan (talk • contribs) 14:28, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

isn't Birdseye american? its progenitor certainly was —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.122.63.142 (talk) 18:42, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the current version of the Clarence Birdseye article implies that this food was invented in the United States.

However, the current version of the Paul Eisler article implies that this food was invented in Britain.

Which is right? --68.0.124.33 (talk) 01:50, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure about the foodstuff itself, but I believe the trade name FishFinger (sic) was the name given in the US, I am quoting from memory I think from Bill Bryson Made in America (book), unfortunately all my books are in store. IIRC, it was named by a female secretary in the marketing department after they had run out of ideas. As I say this is all from memory but might give somebody else something to go on. SimonTrew (talk) 04:00, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

everywhere except england&co they are called fish sticks ;) Markthemac (talk) 01:32, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

battering food isn't really invented, like The Simpsons with cartoons u can say the Romans did it in real life! just like hamburgers another great roman invention.. Markthemac (talk) 01:35, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Except they are not; I am not sure what "in england&co" means (unless it is intended to be deliberately patronising) but here in England they are called "Fish Fingers". They may be called other names in other parts of the UK, or even within England. SimonTrew (talk) 02:36, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

england and consorts, Australia/Ireland/Wales/Scotland etc, the global name is just fish sticks because that's what they technically are "there are no fingers of fish" Markthemac (talk) 12:17, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we disbanded the British Empire roughly half a century ago, and perhaps within my lifetime I shall see Scotland become independent in Europe, though I doubt that Northern Ireland will be. Wales has never (i.e. since before legal records began) been an independent state, always a principality of England. Ireland became a separate state in 1922. Nevertheless, to say "England&co" is, by your own definition, patronising. A Scotsman will not like it if you call him an Englishman, not will a Canadian like it if you call her an American, nor a New Zealander if you call her an Australian. Please, if you want to sensibly make a point on talk, don't patronise your audience. Si Trew (talk) 09:38, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalisim

I found some vandilisim on this page, was wondering if it was okay that i deleted it!

Sure, thanks. Try to remember to sign your posts in the future, though. :) Merpin (talk) 16:51, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Syrup?

Do people really eat fishticks with syrup? It's quite probably my cultural bias speaking, but that just sounds...bizarre. Merpin (talk) 16:51, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

do you like fish sticks?

do you like fishsticks?

oh, so do you like putting fishsticks in your mouth?

so are you a gay fish or something?

LOL LIKE IN THAT SOUTH PARK EPISODE LAST NIGHT

Thanks for taking an interest in the article, but please note that the talk page is for taking *about* the article, not specifically about its subject. Also, please sign your posts. Thanks. SimonTrew (talk) 21:54, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

lol. Well, for the least some interest has been brought to fishsticks.--[|!*//MarshalN20\\*!|] (talk) 14:29, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 :: england and consorts, Australia/Ireland/Wales/Scotland etc, the global name is just fish sticks because that's what they technically are "there are no fingers of fish" [[User:Markthemac|Markthemac]] ([[User talk:Markthemac|talk]]) 12:17, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
-::Well, we disbanded the [[Briish Empire]] roughly half a century ago, and perhaps within my lifetime I shall see Scotland become independent in Europe, though I doubt that Northern Ireland will be. Nevertheless, to say "England&co" is, by your own definition, patronising. A Scotsman will not like it if you call him an Englishman, not will a Canadian like it if you call her an American, nor a New Zealander if you call her an Australian. Please, if you want to sensibly make a point on talk, don't patronise your audience. [[User:SimonTrew|Si Trew]] ([[User talk:SimonTrew|talk]]) 09:38, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
+::Well, we disbanded the [[British Empire]] roughly half a century ago, and perhaps within my lifetime I shall see Scotland become independent in Europe, though I doubt that Northern Ireland will be. Wales has never (i.e. since before legal records began) been an independent state, always a principality of England. Ireland became a separate state in 1922. Nevertheless, to say "England&co" is, by your own definition, patronising. A Scotsman will not like it if you call him an Englishman, not will a Canadian like it if you call her an American, nor a New Zealander if you call her an Australian. Please, if you want to sensibly make a point on talk, don't patronise your audience. [[User:SimonTrew|Si Trew]] ([[User talk:SimonTrew|talk]]) 09:38, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 ==Vandalisim==