Jump to content

Bumiputera (Malaysia): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 60.54.101.212 (talk) to last version by Johnleemk
Line 79: Line 79:


Article 8 of the constitution (clause 2) states: "Except as expressly authorised by this Constitution, there shall be no discrimination against citizens on the ground only of religion, race, descent or place of birth in any law or in the appointment to any office or employment under a public authority or in the administration of any law relating to the acquisition, holding or disposition of property or the establishing or carrying on of any trade, business, profession, vocation or employment."
Article 8 of the constitution (clause 2) states: "Except as expressly authorised by this Constitution, there shall be no discrimination against citizens on the ground only of religion, race, descent or place of birth in any law or in the appointment to any office or employment under a public authority or in the administration of any law relating to the acquisition, holding or disposition of property or the establishing or carrying on of any trade, business, profession, vocation or employment."

At the same time also, the Special Malay Privileges in the [[Bumiputra]] concept which was to be reviewed 15 years after independence have continued unabated without review as promised when the due date arrived, and ensconced several untenable conditions for non-Malays and non-Muslims as listed below.

1) forbids sale of a very large percentage of private owned and government owned public land to non-Muslimied Malay citizens
2) has education quotas for college positions based on racial lines instead of meritocracy
3) automatically grants 12.5% of stock issue to Muslimised Malays
4) offers 7% housing discounts only to Muslimised Malays as well as reserves 10% of all units regardless of private sector freedoms for Muslimised Malays (often resulting in unsaleable units at loss to property developers)
5) Others

The Special Malay Privileges has resulted in decades of socio-economic apartheid conditions and general malaise from non-Malay minority citizens who in their desire for full and equal rights have thankfully with the formation of the Pakatan Rakyat Coalition with support from among;

1) Morally upright Muslims denouncing unequal treatment in respect to the Islamic Hadiths
2) Socially enlightened Malays
3) Malays within ideologically Socialist political parties
4) Malays from sometimes violently oppressed political parties under Barisan Nasional's dominance of government for the past few decades.
5) Several prominent voices within Barisan Nasional's Party, (i.e. Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah , Tunku Aziz)

With the formation of Pakatan Rakyat Coalition in 2009 after severe losses to the Barisan Nasional Coalition in the 2008 election, the minorities have had better platform to be able to speak openly on the issue of citizen equality and are struggling to for their rights as assured by the Human Rights Charter Article 1 which Malaysia is a signatory of but has not applied. The case for abolition of the now expired Special Privileges to be replaced with equal citizenship rights and equal access to social benefits reserved based on ethnicity is being mooted by prominent individuals and activists while ethno-nationalistic factions intent on oppressing minorities attempt to continue it.

The Ruler's Collective meanwhile, has up to now remained ambivalent on the issue, desiring greater competitiveness the expired privileges offer Muslimised Malays, while aware of the problems plaguing a substantial portion on the non-Malay and non-Muslim demographic via this system of two classes of citizenships. While the correct choice is clear, they have not yet decided to make a stand for greater cohesion and unity among the citizens of various religions and ethnicities as they are being nominally being influenced by the racist factions in government as well.


==Controversy==
==Controversy==

Revision as of 14:59, 4 November 2009

Bumiputera or Bumiputra is a Malay term widely used in Malaysia, embracing indigenous people of the Malay Archipelago. The term comes from the Sanskrit word bhumiputra, which can be translated literally as "son of earth" (bhumi= earth, putra=son).

In the 1970s the government implemented economic policies designed to favour bumiputras (including affirmative action in public education) to create opportunities, and to defuse inter-ethnic tensions following the extended violence against Chinese Malayasians in the May 13 Incident in 1969. These policies have succeeded in creating a significant urban Malay middle class. They have been less effective in eradicating poverty among rural communities. Some analysts have noted a backlash of resentment from excluded groups, in particular the sizable Indigenous Non-Muslim Malays Orang Asli, Chinese and Indian Malaysian minorities.

Definition

The concept of a bumiputra ethnic group in Malaysia was coined by activist Tunku Abdul Rahman. It recognized the "special position" of the Malays provided in the Federal Constitution of Malaysia, in particular Article 153. But, the constitution does not use the term "bumiputra"; it defines only "Malay" and "aborigine" (Article 160(2)),[1] "natives" of Sarawak (161A(6)(a)),[2] and "natives" of Sabah (Article 161A(6)(b)).[2] Definitions of bumiputra in public use vary among different institutions, organizations, and government departments and agencies.

In the book Buku Panduan Kemasukan ke Institusi Pengajian Tinggi Awam, Program Pengajian Lepasan SPM/Setaraf Sesi Akademik 2007/2008 (Guidebook for entry into public higher learning institutions for SPM/equivalent graduates for academic year 2007/2008), the Malaysian Higher Education Ministry defined bumiputra as follows, depending on the region of origin of the individual applicant[3]:

  1. Peninsular Malaysia
    • "If one of the parents is Muslim Malay as stated in Article 160 (2) Federal Constitution of Malaysia; thus the child is considered as a Bumiputra"
  2. Sabah
    • "If a father is a Muslim Malay or indigenous native of Sabah as stated in Article 160A (6)(a) Federal Constitution of Malaysia; thus his child is considered as a Bumiputra"
  3. Sarawak
    • "If both of the parent are indigenous natives of Sarawak as stated in Article 160A (6)(b) Federal Constitution of Malaysia; thus their child is considered as a Bumiputra"

In addition to the interpretation given above, some activists have proposed a broader definition of bumiputra to include groups such as the Thai Malaysians, Muslim Indian Malaysians, Straits Chinese or Peranakan [4] and the Kristang people of Portuguese-Eurasian descent. Others favour a definition encompassing all children of Bumiputra; there have been notable cases of people with one Bumiputra parent and one non-Bumiputra parent being dismissed as non-Bumiputra.[3]

History

At the time of Malaya's independence from the British in 1957, the population included many first or second-generation immigrants who had come to fill colonial manpower needs as indentured labourers, a form of limited-term post-emancipation slavery. Malay leaders believed their people were disadvantaged as a minority.

Article 153 of the Constitution states that:

It shall be the responsibility of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong to safeguard the special position of the Malays and natives of any of the States of Sabah and Sarawak and the legitimate interests of other communities in accordance with the provisions of this Article.

Article 160 defines a Malay as being one who "professes the religion of Islam, habitually speaks the Malay language, conforms to Malay customs and is the child of at least one parent who was born within the Federation of Malaysia before independence of Malaya on the 31st of August 1957."

The term of this special position has been disputed. The Reid Commission, which drafted the Constitution, initially proposed that Article 153 expire after 15 years unless renewed by Parliament. This qualification was struck from the final draft. After the of riots the May 13 Incident in 1969, representatives within the government argued over whether the special position of the bumiputras ought to have a sunset clause.

Ismail Abdul Rahman argued that "the question be left to the Malays themselves because ... as more and more Malays became educated and gained self-confidence, they themselves would do away with this 'special position'." Rahman believed the special position was "a slur on the ability of the Malays."[5] In 1970, however, one member of the Cabinet said that Malay special rights would remain for "hundreds of years to come."[6]

The former Prime Minister of Malaysia, Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, and his predecessor Dr.Mahathir bin Mohamad, both sugggested that Malays should depend less on Government handouts and subsidies. It does not appear there is the political will to withdraw the special privileges for the bumiputra any time soon.[citation needed] In contrast, some bumiputra groups have called for the accommodations to be expanded to cover more areas of daily life, such as housing, jobs, etc.

The Parliament began to use the word bumiputra in 1965. Following debate of the act to create the Majlis Amanah Rakyat (MARA), the government founded an agency to preserve bumiputra interests.[7]

Policy

File:OUM bumiputra.jpg
Some institutes of higher learning, such as the Open University Malaysia, have enacted admission policies favouring bumiputra students.

Certain pro-bumiputra policies exist as affirmative action for bumiputras. Such policies include quotas for the following: admission to government educational institutions, qualification for public scholarships, positions in government, and ownership of businesses. Most of the policies were established in the Malaysian New Economic Policy (NEP) period. Many policies focus on trying to achieve a bumiputra share of corporate equity, comprising at least 30% of the total. Ismail Abdul Rahman proposed this target after the government was unable to agree on a suitable policy goal.[5]

Examples of such policies include:

  • Companies listed on the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange (Bursa Saham Kuala Lumpur) must have 30% bumiputra ownership of equity to satisfy listing requirements. Foreign companies that operate in Malaysia also must adhere to this requirement.
  • For a limited period, a certain percentage of new housing in any development has to be sold to bumiputra owners. Housing developers are required to provide a minimum 7% discount to bumiputra buyers of these lots. This is required regardless of the income level of the potential buyer. Remaining unsold houses after a given time period are allowed to be sold to non-bumi if the developer proves attempts have been made to fulfill the requirement. There is no bumiputra discount on existing housing.
  • A basket of government-run (and profit-guaranteed) mutual funds are available for purchase by bumiputra buyers only. The Amanah Saham Nasional (ASN) has return rates approximately 3 to 5 times that of local commercial banks.
  • Many government-tendered projects require that companies submitting tenders be bumiputra owned. This requirement has led to non-bumiputras teaming up with bumiputra companies to obtain projects, in a practice known as "Ali Baba". Ali, the bumiputra, is included solely to satisfy this requirement, and Baba (the non-bumiputra) pays Ali a certain sum in exchange.
  • Projects were earmarked for Malay contractors to enable them to gain expertise in various fields.
  • Approved Permits (APs) for automobiles preferentially allow bumiputra to import vehicles. Automotive companies wishing to bring in cars need to have an AP to do so. APs were originally created to allow bumiputra participation in the automotive industry, since they were issued to companies with at least 70% bumiputra ownership. In 2004, The Edge (a business newspaper) estimated that APs were worth approximately RM 35,000 each. They also estimated that the late Nasimuddin Amin, the former chairman of the Naza group, received 6,387 in 2003, making him the largest single recipient of APs. More than 12,200 APs were issued in 2003. In addition to APs, foreign car marquees are required to pay between 140% to 300% import duty.

As a result of these policies, many bumiputera millionaires with good connections quickly became millionaires. According to Tan Sri Rafidah Aziz (nicknamed the "AP Queen") and former Minister of Trade and Industry, the policy was to create "Towering Malays". (In 2005 she gave a speech that stated: "If there are young Malay entrepreneurs whose companies are successful, then we appreciate their success, we want Towering Malays of glokal (global and local) standard". She also said that the policy of Approved Permits (APs) had produced many bumiputera entrepreneurs in the automotive types of Indigenous. 1. By birth: rules that regulate the indigenous in Malaysia is that, you will not came with a child from out the country and expect him to get a an indigen but it is possible to get a passport if a child has being born here in malaysia. 2. By marriage. by marriage

industry.[8][dead link]

Bumiputras previously received certain privileges in public tertiary education, such as ethnic quotas. In 2004, Dr. Shafie Salleh, the newly appointed Higher Education Minister, stated that he "will ensure the quota of Malay students' entry into universities is always higher."[citation needed] This was demonstrated in 2004 when non-bumiputra students who scored 5As (the highest possible grade) in the STPM were denied admission to their first choice of study in public universities, while bumiputra students with lesser grades were admitted.

Since 2000, the Government has discussed phasing out certain affirmative action programs and reinstating "meritocracy". In 2003 it began the system of "Malaysian model meritocracy" for university admission. Admission to public universities was not based upon a common examination such as the SAT or A-Levels, but rather upon two parallel systems of a one-year matriculation course and a two-year STPM (translated literally as Malaysian Higher School Certificate) programme. Bumiputras compose an overwhelming majority of entrants to the matriculation programme. Critics say that the public university entry requirements are easier for matriculation students.

Quotas also exist for Public Services Department (JPA) scholarships, full scholarships offered to students to study in leading universities worldwide. These scholarships are given on the basis of SPM (translated as "Malaysian Education Certificate", the equivalent of O-Levels) results), ethnic group, and certain quotas. The JPA scholars are sent to selected pre-university programmes offered by the government — from there, they apply to universities.

The laws and rules favouring bumiputras are present in every level of education. For example, in the secondary school-level English Language Debate, at least one of the three active speakers must be a bumiputra. Any team that does not follow this rule is disqualified.

Legitimacy of special rights

Bumiputra privileges and quotas are based on article 153 of the constitution which states that : "It shall be the responsibility of the Yang di Pertuan Agong (YDP) to safeguard the special position of the Malays and the legitimate interests of other communities in accordance with the provisions of this Article." As Malaysia is a constitutional monarchy, YDP responsibilities are regarded as those of the state.

Clause 5 of article 153 specifically reaffirms article 136 of the constitution which states: "All persons of whatever race in the same grade in the service of the Federation shall, subject to the terms and conditions of their employment, be treated impartially."

Clause 9 of article 153 states: "Nothing in this Article shall empower Parliament to restrict business or trade solely for the purpose of reservations for Malays."

Article 8 of the constitution (clause 2) states: "Except as expressly authorised by this Constitution, there shall be no discrimination against citizens on the ground only of religion, race, descent or place of birth in any law or in the appointment to any office or employment under a public authority or in the administration of any law relating to the acquisition, holding or disposition of property or the establishing or carrying on of any trade, business, profession, vocation or employment."

Controversy

The Bumiputra laws stand out as an unusual public policy where preferential actions benefit the majority race of a country, and some[citation needed] argue that the advantages afforded to Bumiputras are unfair and border on outright racism. Others[citation needed] argue that the Malaysian situation at the time the policy was introduced — where a minority ethnic group widely regarded as non-native controlled most of the locally-owned sector of the economy, due in no small part to colonial legacies which had assisted Chinese migrants to become dominant in the business sector to the point that Malays were largely excluded from economic life, other than as subsistence farmers, small-scale fishermen, and laborers — was an unusual and deeply unstable situation. The government also argues that the legal and economic advantages are necessary for Malaysia to reduce ethnic conflict. The NEP, in particular, was spurred by large racial riots on May 13, 1969.

Another controversial aspect is that the Orang Asli of peninsular Malaysia are not considered Bumiputra under the Federal constitution. As their settlement predates that of the Malays, this is considered unfair by many, especially as they are also much worse off than the Malays. As such, various groups including SUHAKAM, the Malaysian Commission of Human Rights have called for the government to recognise Orang Asli as Bumiputra[9] Others argue that the Orang Asli are in fact considered Bumiputra.[10]

Recently, members of the Indian community have also been vocal in demonstrating for Hindu rights and protesting that their community has long been worse off than the Malay community, a situation compounded by unfavorable treatment as non-Bumiputras. Several members of the Hindu Rights Action Force (HINDRAF) are currently in detention under the Internal Security Act (ISA).

On the 1st of March 2009, Datuk Nik Aziz Nik Mat, the spiritual leader of the opposition Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party stated that the term “bumiputera” is racist and the policy prevented other races from receiving government aid. Nik Aziz’s remarks were made in response to the criticisms and threats made by UMNO against Democratic Action Party’s Dr Boo Cheng Hau, the opposition leader in Johor when Dr Boo was reported to have compared “bumiputeraism” with state apartheid[11].

Early debate

In the 1965 session of Parliament, Singapore's Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew (who was also a Member of that Parliament) questioned the implementation of Malay rights as proposed. Lee asked, "How does the Malay in the kampung find his way out into this modernised civil society? By becoming servants of the 0.3 per cent who would have the money to hire them to clean their shoe, open their motorcar doors?" and "How does telling a Malay bus driver that he should support the party of his Malay director (UMNO) and the Chinese bus conductor to join another party of his Chinese director (MCA) — how does that improve the standards of the Malay bus driver and the Chinese bus conductor who are both workers in the same company?"

Lee closed with "Meanwhile, whenever there is a failure of economic, social and educational policies, you come back and say, oh, these wicked Chinese, Indian and others opposing Malay rights. They don't oppose Malay rights. They, the Malay, have the right as Malaysian citizens to go up to the level of training and education that the more competitive societies, the non-Malay society, has produced. That is what must be done, isn't it? Not to feed them with this obscurantist doctrine that all they have got to do is to get Malay rights for the few special Malays and their problem has been resolved."

It soon became clear that the PAP's campaign for a Malaysian Malaysia under the Malaysian Solidarity Convention as an indirect challenge against the racial policies was not well received by the ruling Alliance, led by the United Malays National Organisation (UMNO). Amidst the escalating communal issues in the state of Singapore, and the problems regarding the racial tensions created by the PAP, Tunku Abdul Rahman announced Singapore's expulsion from the Federation of Malaysia on 9 August 1965, hours after the Malaysian Prime Minister made a similar announcement in the Malaysian Parliament.

Education

In 2004, Mohd. Johari Baharum, parliamentary secretary of the Prime Minister's Department, stated that the PSD scholarships would remain quota based. He added that there were no plans to convert this to a merit based system, and that the total value of the PSD scholarship since 1996 was 2.4 billion Ringgit.[12] There have been reported cases of students who failed to get PSD scholarships, but were later admitted to leading universities.

In an autobiographical book, "A Malaysian Journey", by former Malaysian journalist Rehman Rashid, the author claims that the teachers are pressured in the universities to give favorable grades to the bumiputra students, even if they have inferior answers compared to the non-bumiputra students. He also suggests that the grants given by private corporations to students may in fact be unofficially earmarked to bumiputra.

Public questioning of rights

At the 55th annual general assembly of the largest political party in Malaysia, the United Malays National Organisation, the deputy chairperson Badruddin Amiruldin cautioned against questioning the Bumiputras' special rights, and was met with approval from the delegates: "Let no one from the other races ever question the rights of Malays on this land. Don’t question the religion because this is my right on this land."

Present condition of the Bumiputra

Former Prime Minister Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohammad has bemoaned the extreme reliance of Bumiputras on their privileges: "We have tried to tell them if you depend on subsidies, you are going to be very weak. But they don’t seem to understand. We tell them if you use crutches, you will not be able to stand up. Throw away the crutches, stand up straight because you still have the capacity. I have talked about this thing and as a doctor I know very well the meaning of crutches but somehow or rather they want the easy way out. If I get an AP [car import permit] and I sell it and make some money, it’s all right, they say."

Mahathir (who was also education minister previously) also said in 2004 that Malay graduates tend to have low employment rates because "the Chinese graduates choose the right subjects so they are employable. We find that the Malay graduates, especially those from the Malay stream, can’t speak English at all. No matter how much value you put on a certificate, the fact remains that an employer wants somebody with whom he can communicate. The employer is not Malay, he is a foreigner. And if he’s not going to be able to communicate with you, he will not take you."

Furthermore, the Malay students, with Government-issued scholarships and study loans, tend to take up subjects like Syariah Law, Islamic History and other Islam-related subjects. Instead of choosing to learn English and taking up subjects that are of more secular tangible benefits (e.g. Engineering, Medicine, etc.) some have gone to great lengths to further their studies in Middle Eastern countries, learning Arabic in the process. Even so, this has not always been to the benefit of the students. In June 2006, it was revealed that a batch of 169 students sent to the Al-Azhar University in Cairo had difficulties with the Arabic language, resulting in only 5 students making it through their course.[13] The Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, had strongly criticized this trend among Malay students to choose "simple subjects" which are worthless in the job market.

In 2006, the then Minister of Higher Education, Mustapa Mohamad, has stated that that he wants public universities to recruit more non-bumiputra academic staff in order to "strive for world-class institutions", which may signal a move toward less racial profiling in academia.

However, as of 2007, Chinese Malaysians dominate the professions of accountants, architects and engineers while Indian Malaysians dominate the professions of veterinarians, doctors, lawyers and dentists well exceeding their respective population ratios compared to Bumiputra.[2][3]

It should be noted that the manufacturing sector is exempted from the Foreign Investment Committee (FIC) Guidelines. The 30% Bumiputera equity and restrictions in market entry have been removed for all sub-sectors.(pdf)

The state of Penang has announced that it will no longer favour Bumiputras in state sector employment, following the 2008 elections in which the ruling Barisan Nasional coalition was defeated in that state.

In April 2009 Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak (also President of UMNO) liberalised 27 sub-sectors from the 30% equity exempting them from Bumiputra equity. This however was widely viewed as an attempt to salvage the general malaise and severe corruption that had affected the Malaysian political scene. While UMNO itself has been affected by severe corruption and money politics, members in major coalition partners such as MCA, MIC, and PPP have lost much support from the minority populace who have been demanding equal treatment as elucidated in the Human Rights Charter Article 1 via the removal of constitutional clauses that have institutionalized Special Malay Privileges into a form of economic apartheid and cultural suppression. Opposition coalition Pakatan Rakyat has in turn gained large groundswell of support in addressing the apartheid issue and has better consultation with the citizenry so far, though not without internal friction within it's coalition partners.

See also

Notes and references

  1. ^ "Part XII: General and Miscellaneous, Constitution of Malaysia (Articles 152 - 160)", helplinelaw.com. Accessed May 30, 2007
  2. ^ a b Part XIIA: Additional Protections for States of Sabah and Sarawak, Constitution of Malaysia (Articles 161 - 161h), helplinelaw. Accessed May 30, 2007
  3. ^ a b "Being 'mixed' is no privilege". Borneo Post. 2009-10-29. Retrieved 2009-10-29. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  4. ^ "Malaysia: The People of Malaysia", TripAdvisor
  5. ^ a b "Snag in policy implementation", New Straits Times, 31 Dec 2006, pp. 8–9
  6. ^ Lim, Kit Siang (1978). Time Bombs in Malaysia, p. 218 (2nd ed.). Democratic Action Party. No ISBN available.
  7. ^ Tan, Chee Koon & Vasil, Raj (ed., 1984). Without Fear or Favour, p. 10. Eastern Universities Press. ISBN 967-908-051-X.
  8. ^ [1], Web 5
  9. ^ suhakam.org.my (PDF)
  10. ^ temiar.com
  11. ^ "Nik Aziz says 'bumiputera' term is racist". The Malaysian Insider. 2009-03-01. Retrieved 2009-03-01.
  12. ^ malaysiakini.com
  13. ^ Only Five Students Complete Course. Bernama. June 5 2006.

Other references