User talk:SpK

Photo help

I took a photo and put it up on Wiki Commons to put on this article here. It said I had no licence, but surely if I took the work I know that I am not infringing my own copyright? Please explain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.8.246.55 (talk) 22:14, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

In order to upload an image, you have to license it. What license you choose is up to you. I'd recommend just releasing it into the public domain to avoid any future conflicts. ~SpK 22:58, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Be Careful About Vandalism Warnings, You're Mistaken

I explained in both re-edits that they're not vandalism (Isengard (Norwegian band) and Talk:Isengard (Norwegian band)). You should reconsider your "warnings". (And I tried moving first but the previous page had to be deleted, hence it couldn't be moved, that's why I moved the content instead.) Dimitrakopulos (talk) 20:48, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

First, please do not be agressive, it isn't necessary. Secondly, there are reasons why things cannot be moved sometimes, and if pages have to be deleted and moved, there is protocol to doing these things (i.e. discussions about moves etc.). Please don't just move pages because you feel they need to be moved. ~SpK 20:51, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

None of that was "aggressive". Hopefully you don't receive quotations as aggression. Now I'm aware of the protocols. Thanks.Dimitrakopulos (talk) 20:55, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

As per Wikipedia policy, I will be reverting their pages to their original location, and performing a proper page move on your behalf.

~SpK 20:58, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Alright, cheers. Dimitrakopulos (talk) 21:03, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks.Dimitrakopulos (talk) 15:14, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

No problem at all. If there's ever anything else I can help you with, just let me know :) Cheers,

~SpK 15:43, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for that extremely speedy cleanup of this vandalism on my user talk. Before I could click "New Message" it was gone! --Vishnu2011 (talk) 23:00, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Hey, no problem. When you're armed with Huggle, there's nothing you can't do :) Cheers!

~SpK 23:01, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Ha twice now! I always get so excited to see what new message I have, but it turns out to be a downer. Thanks Again! Vishnu2011 (talk) 23:03, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Did I forget to thank you? ..

SpK ,Thank you for participating in my RfA, which passed nearly unanimously with 174 in support, 2 in opposition and 1 neutral votes. Special thanks goes to RegentsPark, Samir and John Carter for their kind nomination and support. I am truly honored by the trust and confidence that the community has placed in me. I thank you for your kind inputs and I will be sincerely looking at the reasons that people opposed me so I can improve in those areas ( including my english ;) ). If you ever need anything please feel free to ask me and I would be happy to help you :). Have a great day ! -- Tinu Cherian - 06:02, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Article

Why was my page put up for deletion? I didn't see anything wrong. I had 3 days of work I had just finished, as soon as I post it, it gets overrided by a deletion warning. The first page you probably saw was not done, it went much more than that. Please help me get that back! Rougeloverboy2 (talk) 16:55, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Be a little careful not to tag for speedy deletion too fast

Re, articles like Concession (comic), wait a little bit next time before tagging for speedy deletion. I think you may have unintentionally bitten a newcomer there when you tagged that one so quickly. Many new users don't know that coming up with drafts before placing into the mainspace is a good idea. For articles like that, wait a little bit and see what the author does with it.

With that said, keep up the good work, especially with the vandalism/Huggling. Thank you, MuZemike 20:02, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, you're right, I did put it on quite quickly. I'll definitely try to be more courteous in the future, and avoid biting the newcomers. Thanks so much for your feedback :) ~SpK 21:33, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism warnings

Your "vandalism" warnings with respect to my removing the "popular culture" section of the "Boomslang" page are unwarranted. There is no reason whatsoever to have a "popular culture" section in a zoological article. Moreover, the section itself had been flagged for review.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.4.185.170 (talk)

Just because the section has been flagged for review doesn't mean people have permission to just delete it. Any issues like this should be discussed on the article's talk page, and not just deleted. Also, see Wikipedia's 3RR policy. Please don't remove this section without first discussing it on the talk page, here. Also, please sign your posts by putting four tildes ~~~~ after posts on talk pages of any kind. Thanks, and welcome to Wikipedia! ~SpK 21:42, 4 November 2009 (UTC)