Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Schabir Shaik Trial: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m fix minor formatting mistake
Line 8: Line 8:
::I've gone ahead and fixed them [[User:The Catfish|The Catfish]] 18:27, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
::I've gone ahead and fixed them [[User:The Catfish|The Catfish]] 18:27, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
*'''Support''' - More pictures would be nice, though. - [[User:Cuivienen|Cuivienen]] 23:49, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
*'''Support''' - More pictures would be nice, though. - [[User:Cuivienen|Cuivienen]] 23:49, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
*'''Support. But an external links section would be good, and there are few references in the 'References' section - More pictures would also be a nice addition to the article. — [[User:Wackymacs|Wackymacs]] 20:25, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. But an external links section would be good, and there are few references in the 'References' section - More pictures would also be a nice addition to the article. — [[User:Wackymacs|Wackymacs]] 20:25, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:25, 22 December 2005

Self-nom. I am relising this as I truly believe it deserves to be a featured article. Its first listing received little attention, despite this being one of the most important court trials in South African history. Previous lising is here. User:PZFUN/signature 07:56, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

One citation points to the same footnote, and I found it silly to continuously repeat the same footnote when from reading the articles its fairly obvious. User:PZFUN/signature 20:05, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
The numbers in the citations and footnotes should line up. See Saffron for a nice little method of citing one footnote multiple times and keeping the numbers lined up. The Catfish 23:19, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I've gone ahead and fixed them The Catfish 18:27, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]