User talk:The Squicks: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Hauskalainen (talk | contribs) |
The Squicks (talk | contribs) ←Replaced content with '{{retired|date=November 2009}}' |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{retired|date=November 2009}} |
|||
[[File:Toby.png|thumb|left|300px|This page is being watched over by the '''[[Wikipedia:Toby|Toby]]''' to [[Wikipedia_talk:Toby|prevent negative thoughts]]. Please. Join Us.]] |
|||
{{archive box| [[/Archive 1|Archive 1 (Feb. 08 - May 09)]], [[/Archive 2|Archive 2 (May 09 - Sept. 09)]], [[/Archive 3|Archive 3 (Sept. 09)]], [[/Archive 4|Archive 4 (Oct. 09 -)]]}} |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|AfD]] nomination of [[List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming]] == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|left|48px|]]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion process|deletion]]. The nominated article is [[List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming]]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also [[Wikipedia:Notability]] and "[[WP:NOT|What Wikipedia is not]]"). |
|||
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming (3rd nomination)]]. Please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). |
|||
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the [[WP:AfD|articles for deletion]] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. |
|||
'''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a [[WP:BOT|bot]]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --[[User:Erwin85Bot|Erwin85Bot]] ([[User talk:Erwin85Bot|talk]]) 01:09, 23 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Your [[WP:GA|GA]] nomination of [[Michael Yon]]== |
|||
The article [[Michael Yon]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has been placed on hold [[Image:Symbol wait.svg|20px]]. The article is close to meeting the [[WP:GA?|good article criteria]], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See [[Talk:Michael Yon]] for things needed to be addressed. [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 21:18, 24 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Jackson Jive == |
|||
I've left a few observations regarding [[the Jackson Jive]] at [[Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board#The Jackson Jive]], following your request there. -- [[User:Saberwyn|saberwyn]] 05:54, 25 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Okay, thanks. [[User:The Squicks|The Squicks]] ([[User talk:The Squicks#top|talk]]) 22:54, 25 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Re: Talk:Glenn Beck == |
|||
Not sure why the page is on my watchlist: I must've reverted some vandalism to the page at some point in the past. At any rate, if that sort of thing appears again -- whether in an article, talk page or user talk page makes no difference -- it calls for aggressive instant removal. Cheers! --[[User:Rrburke|Rrburke]]<sup><small>([[User_talk:Rrburke|talk]])</small></sup> 00:44, 30 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:''aggressive instant removal'' My feelings precisely! [[User:The Squicks|The Squicks]] ([[User talk:The Squicks#top|talk]]) 05:53, 30 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Chuck Grassley == |
|||
Your opinions during the whole RFC were well on target. There was no reason for that information to be added, especially because it would turn out that the user had a history of sockpuppetry and pov edits. [[User:Richard|<font face="Times New Roman" color="blue">''Richard''</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Richard|<font color="green">talk</font>]])</small> 10:53, 1 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Don't worry, sooner or later that user's personal history will catch up with him. [[User:The Squicks|The Squicks]] ([[User talk:The Squicks#top|talk]]) 23:38, 1 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== What the heck does that comment about me in the Edit Summary refer to? == |
|||
I am puzzled. Enlighten me.--[[User:Hauskalainen|Hauskalainen]] ([[User talk:Hauskalainen|talk]]) 23:58, 1 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:Which comment? I've edited Wikipedia continuously in the past several weeks. [[User:The Squicks|The Squicks]] ([[User talk:The Squicks#top|talk]]) 23:59, 1 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::This one "So, you are admitting to using biased language in describing a person in an article just because you don't like him? I'll be sure to note that fact for future reference" |
|||
::http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Public_health_insurance_option&diff=prev&oldid=323373456 |
|||
::*What biased language? |
|||
::*Who is "the person" I am describing? Senator Grassley? |
|||
::*What gives you ground for making any assumptions of my opinion of the "him" you are referring to? |
|||
::*What "admission"? |
|||
::*What is meant by "I'll be sure to note that fact for future reference"? |
|||
::Make the note here. I'd love to hear more about it.--[[User:Hauskalainen|Hauskalainen]] ([[User talk:Hauskalainen|talk]]) 10:54, 3 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Evangelical Christian Bigotry== |
|||
Stop editing and creating pages with your biased ways you bigot. I feel you should just quit wikipedia as every move you make is knowingly or unknowingly biased and skewed. Don't even bother to reply to me, just get off wikipedia and learn about how to present information in a neutral way. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Filthyfix|Filthyfix]] ([[User talk:Filthyfix|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Filthyfix|contribs]]) 16:05, 2 November 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:If you continue your behavior, you will be blocked soon. Be aware of that. [[User:The Squicks|The Squicks]] ([[User talk:The Squicks#top|talk]]) 17:41, 2 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== RE: Prejean talk page == |
|||
FYI. I agree that the blog portion was a blp violation and at least imho could be reverted as a 3rr exception. My comment was not intended to mean that I was going to let it stand, but rather I was going to then seek someone to make the reversions un-needed. That's why I posted to [[WP:BLPN]] although turns out the block-hammer came down before I could finish typing. Best regards.--[[User:Cube lurker|Cube lurker]] ([[User talk:Cube lurker|talk]]) 18:01, 2 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:I see what you mean. Thanks for posting. [[User:The Squicks|The Squicks]] ([[User talk:The Squicks#top|talk]]) 18:44, 2 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:31, 5 November 2009
Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia as of November 2009.