Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maggie Bandur: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion page for Maggie Bandur. using TW
 
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
:({{findsources|Maggie Bandur}})
:({{findsources|Maggie Bandur}})
No [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] found. Article consists of [[WP:2S|two sentences]] and a very short list, only source cited is IMDb. <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, his otters and a clue-bat • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Many otters]] • [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|One bat]] • [[User:TenPoundHammer|One hammer]])</sup> 02:01, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
No [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] found. Article consists of [[WP:2S|two sentences]] and a very short list, only source cited is IMDb. <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, his otters and a clue-bat • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Many otters]] • [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|One bat]] • [[User:TenPoundHammer|One hammer]])</sup> 02:01, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
:'''Keep'''. The article is based in reliable sources found rather quickly. It is credited in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Maggie_Bandur a number of wikipedia articles], therefore I concluded she is reasonably visible (see credits), so I made a quick stub. But I will not cry over it, if nobody wants to waste their time to make a better article. - Altenmann [[user talk:Altenmann|>t]] 02:08, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:08, 11 November 2009

Maggie Bandur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources found. Article consists of two sentences and a very short list, only source cited is IMDb. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 02:01, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The article is based in reliable sources found rather quickly. It is credited in a number of wikipedia articles, therefore I concluded she is reasonably visible (see credits), so I made a quick stub. But I will not cry over it, if nobody wants to waste their time to make a better article. - Altenmann >t 02:08, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]