Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maggie Bandur: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 02:27, 11 November 2009

Maggie Bandur

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources found. Article consists of two sentences and a very short list, only source cited is IMDb. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 02:01, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The article is based in reliable sources found rather quickly. It is credited in a number of wikipedia articles, therefore I concluded she is reasonably visible (see credits), so I made a quick stub. But I will not cry over it, if nobody wants to waste their time to make a better article. - Altenmann >t 02:08, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What reliable sources? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 02:10, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What facts do you question? If you question imdb as source, I may waste more of my time and dig closer ones, like I've just added, jst for fun of bickering, but really??? Like I said, I will not cry over it and not waste any more time here: no my domain. - Altenmann >t 02:10, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The whole article. IMDb is not a reliable source, and beyond that I can't find anything that verifies the content, from her writers' credits to Jeopardy! win. Even so, I fail to see how she meets the notability guidelines if there are no reliable, third-party sources written primarily about her. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 02:16, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bah, that's an easy one. You are picking something from your hat, I can do the same: Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Creative_professionals say: "The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work". I sare say that Malcolm in the Middle is rather well known among american teenagers, who work hard on wikipedia, both contributing and vandalizing. - Altenmann >t 02:27, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 :::What facts do you question? If you question imdb as source, I may waste more of my time and dig closer ones, like I've just added, jst for fun of bickering, but really??? Like I said, I will not cry over it and not waste any more time here: no my domain. - Altenmann [[user talk:Altenmann|>t]] 02:10, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
 ::::The whole article. IMDb is not a reliable source, and beyond that I can't find anything that [[WP:V|verifies]] the content, from her writers' credits to Jeopardy! win. Even so, I fail to see how she meets [[WP:N|the notability guidelines]] if there are no [[WP:RS|reliable, third-party sources]] written primarily about her. <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, his otters and a clue-bat • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Many otters]] • [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|One bat]] • [[User:TenPoundHammer|One hammer]])</sup> 02:16, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
+:::::Bah, that's an easy one. You are picking something from your hat, I can do the same: [[Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Creative_professionals]] say: ''"The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work"''. I sare say that [[Malcolm in the Middle]] is rather well known among american teenagers, who work hard on wikipedia, both contributing and vandalizing. - Altenmann [[user talk:Altenmann|>t]] 02:27, 11 November 2009 (UTC)