User:William M. Connolley/Arbcomm 2009 elections: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No / maybe |
a few more |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Last year I wrote up some stuff; must try to find that. Ditto Boris's. |
Last year I wrote up some stuff; must try to find that. Ditto Boris's. |
||
From admins, I look for a useful block log. From re-standing arbs, some admission of the current obvious problems. From all, some kind of sane statement. I'm strongly influenced by what I know about people by contact with them. |
From admins, I look for a useful block log. From re-standing arbs, some admission of the current obvious problems. From all, some kind of sane statement. I'm strongly influenced by what I know about people by contact with them. If a candidate isn't an admin, they'd better have a good reason for not having run (or having failed). If you're not ready to do an admins tasks, you're not ready to be an arb. |
||
Yes / No with capital is final; in lower case, tentative. Feel free to ask if you want expansion. |
Yes / No with capital is final; in lower case, tentative. Feel free to ask if you want expansion. |
||
* {{user|AGK}} |
* {{user|AGK}}. No. answers to questions. |
||
* {{user|Chutznik}} |
* {{user|Chutznik}}. No. Silly; see statement. |
||
* {{user|Cla68}} |
* {{user|Cla68}}. No, obviously. |
||
* {{user|Coren}}. |
* {{user|Coren}}. no. Initially undecided (obvious context) but ''I believe I, and the committee as a whole, did a fairly good job during the past year'' is bad. |
||
* {{user|Fred Bauder}} |
* {{user|Fred Bauder}} |
||
* {{user|Fritzpoll}} |
* {{user|Fritzpoll}} |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
* {{user|Steve Smith}} |
* {{user|Steve Smith}} |
||
* {{user|Unomi}}. No. Any number of reasons, [http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/ec/Unomi] will doom him alone. Should stand down now to avoid wasting time. |
* {{user|Unomi}}. No. Any number of reasons, [http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/ec/Unomi] will doom him alone. Should stand down now to avoid wasting time. |
||
* {{user|Wehwalt}} yes. Inclined to support (even if he is a lawyer) and have liked what I've seen. Some troubling answers to questions. At [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive544#User:James_von_Brunn] has the right ideas and the right enemies and unlike the current arbcomm, is anti-airbrushing. |
* {{user|Wehwalt}} yes. Inclined to support (even if he is a lawyer) and have liked what I've seen. Some troubling answers to questions. At [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive544#User:James_von_Brunn] has the right ideas and the right enemies and unlike the current arbcomm, is anti-airbrushing. Talks to much about articles in his statement. |
||
* {{user|William M. Connolley}}. Yes, of course :-). |
* {{user|William M. Connolley}}. Yes, of course :-). |
||
* {{user|Xavexgoem}} |
* {{user|Xavexgoem}} |
||
Revision as of 23:03, 22 November 2009
These are my thoughts on the 2009 arbcomm elections. My statement is Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2009/Candidate statements/William M. Connolley. All the statements are at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2009/Candidate statements.
Last year I wrote up some stuff; must try to find that. Ditto Boris's.
From admins, I look for a useful block log. From re-standing arbs, some admission of the current obvious problems. From all, some kind of sane statement. I'm strongly influenced by what I know about people by contact with them. If a candidate isn't an admin, they'd better have a good reason for not having run (or having failed). If you're not ready to do an admins tasks, you're not ready to be an arb.
Yes / No with capital is final; in lower case, tentative. Feel free to ask if you want expansion.
- AGK (talk · contribs). No. answers to questions.
- Chutznik (talk · contribs). No. Silly; see statement.
- Cla68 (talk · contribs). No, obviously.
- Coren (talk · contribs). no. Initially undecided (obvious context) but I believe I, and the committee as a whole, did a fairly good job during the past year is bad.
- Fred Bauder (talk · contribs)
- Fritzpoll (talk · contribs)
- Jehochman (talk · contribs)
- Kirill Lokshin (talk · contribs). Yes. Wish he'd been around for my case.
- Kmweber (talk · contribs)
- KnightLago (talk · contribs)
- Mailer diablo (talk · contribs)
- MBK004 (talk · contribs)
- RMHED (talk · contribs)
- Ruslik0 (talk · contribs)
- Seddon (talk · contribs)
- Shell_Kinney (talk · contribs)
- SirFozzie (talk · contribs)
- Steve Smith (talk · contribs)
- Unomi (talk · contribs). No. Any number of reasons, [1] will doom him alone. Should stand down now to avoid wasting time.
- Wehwalt (talk · contribs) yes. Inclined to support (even if he is a lawyer) and have liked what I've seen. Some troubling answers to questions. At [2] has the right ideas and the right enemies and unlike the current arbcomm, is anti-airbrushing. Talks to much about articles in his statement.
- William M. Connolley (talk · contribs). Yes, of course :-).
- Xavexgoem (talk · contribs)