Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Bambenek: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 12: Line 12:
*Is this the same guy? Security expert in the news around 9-10 December related a problem with Firefox. http://www.playfuls.com/news_0368_Mozilla_Firefox_15_Exploit_Much_Ado_About_Nothing.html
*Is this the same guy? Security expert in the news around 9-10 December related a problem with Firefox. http://www.playfuls.com/news_0368_Mozilla_Firefox_15_Exploit_Much_Ado_About_Nothing.html
--[[User:Ari89|Ari89]] 10:18, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
--[[User:Ari89|Ari89]] 10:18, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. There is an exploratory committee that does meet weekly on Thursdays. Also, yes, it is the same person in that firefox article, and you can find several others if you have Lexis. -- [[User:12.203.38.138|12.203.38.138]] 14:53, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. There is an exploratory committee that does meet weekly on Thursdays. Also, yes, it is the same person in that firefox article, and you can find several others if you have Lexis. Also, this nominator was involved with this vandalism [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=John_Bambenek&diff=31577399&oldid=31531254] in the same article. -- [[User:12.203.38.138|12.203.38.138]] 14:53, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:56, 26 December 2005

This seems to be a vanity page. The subject of the article has edited the page several times, and there's been several instances of unverfiable information, such as a gubernatorial run, inserted. perardi 03:58, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - Quite a polymath, my only problem is the category for "politician" at the bottom of the article. Endomion 06:20, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep after removing all the vanity. --Quarl 11:30, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete vanity, nn. The Google hits I checked all seemed to be resumes or profiles on interactive sites. If someone can find any media coverage on him, please point me to it. In any case, a high Google count does not necessarily establish notability (I have about 5000 hits on Google, myself). -- Dalbury(Talk) 12:09, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is it possible that this is just taken from the preface of one of his books or something? It reads that way with a strong introductory narrative feel rather than something for an encylopedia article. Because of that reason I would suggest deletion to avoid further troubles but the publications might be noteworthy to keep somewhere. So I think it should be kept for that kind of resource as long as there is no copy vios. Keep--Ari89 12:16, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

--Ari89 10:18, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. There is an exploratory committee that does meet weekly on Thursdays. Also, yes, it is the same person in that firefox article, and you can find several others if you have Lexis. Also, this nominator was involved with this vandalism [1] in the same article. -- 12.203.38.138 14:53, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]