User talk:Bov: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:50, 26 December 2005

Welcome!

Hello Bov, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — MATHWIZ2020 ^{TALK | CONTRIBS} 01:58, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

9/11

Please do not add wtc7 links to pages such as Collapse of the World Trade Center. Conspiracy beliefs which are held by a very small minority should stay in the 9/11 conspiracy theories article. Thank you. Rhobite 19:29, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, if Wikipedia is divided between the word of the Bush Admin being 'the truth' and the 'view of the world' and everything else being 'conspiracy theory,' then we're headed into fascism faster than I thought. I'm a 9/11 researcher and as it turns out, there are many like me all over the world. That's why those trying to stop the exposure of the STUDY of what happened on 9/11 by labelling people with derogatory phrases ('conspiracy theorists,' i.e., commie pinko, longhair, reds, etc.) straight out of Whitehouse mouthpieces and criminals, are engaged in a losing effort, even here on Wikipedia. As the lies coming out of the fascist Administration compound daily, the work of their own small army - patriots, wannabe neocons, religious right, Left Icons, disinfo peddlers, agents and others like them - is crushed by the weight of their increasing work load to protect the government version of 'truth' as they go around trying to insert 'conspiracy theory' and 'tinfoil hat' or 'no-plane' into every place that tries to even EXAMINE the evidence. Why not join us, instead of trying to fight us? It's okay to ask questions -- that isn't against the law . . . yet. Might as well enjoy it while we can. Bov 19:48, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

AFD Alert!

The list of researchers is now being AFDed. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/9/11 conspiracy theories/September 11 researchers. I'm counter-proposing that it be kept and moved to its own page. Blackcats 23:09, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to Blackcats who does important editing and maintenance on the 9/11 pages.Bov 19:50, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 19:48, 26 December 2005 edit Bov (talk \| contribs) 1,905 edits →9/11 ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:50, 26 December 2005 edit undo Bov (talk \| contribs) 1,905 edits →AFD Alert! Next edit →
Line 18:		Line 18:

	The list of researchers is now being AFDed. See [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/9/11 conspiracy theories/September 11 researchers]]. I'm counter-proposing that it be kept and moved to its own page. [[User:Blackcats\|Blackcats]] 23:09, 15 December 2005 (UTC)		The list of researchers is now being AFDed. See [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/9/11 conspiracy theories/September 11 researchers]]. I'm counter-proposing that it be kept and moved to its own page. [[User:Blackcats\|Blackcats]] 23:09, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

			:Thanks to Blackcats who does important editing and maintenance on the 9/11 pages.[[User:Bov\|Bov]] 19:50, 26 December 2005 (UTC)