Talk:Battle of Chipyong-ni: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:33, 25 November 2009

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Chipyong-ni article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Korea

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean military history task force.

China

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / Chinese / European / French / Korean / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Korean military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Globalize

This article needs more of the Chinese side of the battle. Units, commanders, that sort of thing. Cerebellum (talk) 14:23, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to work on it, but I can't touch this article until Battle of Ch'ongch'on River and Third Battle of Seoul are finished. Jim101 (talk) 22:10, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In the meantime, does anyone have time to read the book I put up in the reference? It is THE most authoritative account of the battle. Jim101 (talk) 22:19, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have the time to dig the records, but judging from the map in the article, Chinese 39th and 40th Corps was involved in the battle, which means a total strength of 4 Regiments with 12,000 soldiers. Chinese commanders should be the same as the one I put up in Battle of Unsan. Also, this battle is far more important than this article implies, it should be considered to be a major battle with far more detail. Jim101 (talk) 22:33, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 : I'm trying to work on it, but I can't touch this article until [[Battle of Ch'ongch'on River]] and [[Third Battle of Seoul]] are finished. [[User:Jim101|Jim101]] ([[User talk:Jim101|talk]]) 22:10, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 : In the meantime, does anyone have time to read the book I put up in the reference? It is THE most authoritative account of the battle. [[User:Jim101|Jim101]] ([[User talk:Jim101|talk]]) 22:19, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
+: I don't have the time to dig the records, but judging from the map in the article, Chinese 39th and 40th Corps was involved in the battle, which means a total strength of 4 Regiments with 12,000 soldiers. Chinese commanders should be the same as the one I put up in [[Battle of Unsan]]. Also, this battle is far more important than this article implies, it should be considered to be a major battle with far more detail. [[User:Jim101|Jim101]] ([[User talk:Jim101|talk]]) 22:33, 25 November 2009 (UTC)