Talk:Battle of Chipyong-ni: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
|location=Westport, CT |
|location=Westport, CT |
||
|isbn = 0-313-29509-3 |
|isbn = 0-313-29509-3 |
||
}} My grandfather fought around there during this battle, and this book tells you exactly what my grandfather told me everytime: Chinese were fighting |
}} My grandfather fought around there during this battle, and this book tells you exactly what my grandfather told me everytime: Chinese were fighting on 10 rifle rounds per person with no food, and it is the reason why the UN managed to hold out here. [[User:Jim101|Jim101]] ([[User talk:Jim101|talk]]) 22:58, 25 November 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:04, 25 November 2009
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Chipyong-ni article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Globalize
This article needs more of the Chinese side of the battle. Units, commanders, that sort of thing. Cerebellum (talk) 14:23, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
- I'm trying to work on it, but I can't touch this article until Battle of Ch'ongch'on River and Third Battle of Seoul are finished. In the meantime, does anyone have time to read the book I put up in the reference? It is THE most authoritative account of the battle. Jim101 (talk) 22:19, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- I don't have the time to dig the records, but judging from the map in the article, Chinese 39th and 40th Corps was involved in the battle, and the map imples a total Chinese strength of 4 regiments with 12,000 soldiers. Chinese commanders should be the same as the one I put up in Battle of Unsan. Also, this battle is far more important than this article implies, it should be considered as a major battle with far more detail. Jim101 (talk) 22:33, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- I'll work on it. Thanks for the info! Cerebellum (talk) 22:48, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- If you really want to dig deeper on the Chinese side of the battle, I recommand you read Shrader, Charles R. (1995). Communist Logistics in the Korean War. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. ISBN 0-313-29509-3. My grandfather fought around there during this battle, and this book tells you exactly what my grandfather told me everytime: Chinese were fighting on 10 rifle rounds per person with no food, and it is the reason why the UN managed to hold out here. Jim101 (talk) 22:58, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- I don't have the time to dig the records, but judging from the map in the article, Chinese 39th and 40th Corps was involved in the battle, and the map imples a total Chinese strength of 4 regiments with 12,000 soldiers. Chinese commanders should be the same as the one I put up in Battle of Unsan. Also, this battle is far more important than this article implies, it should be considered as a major battle with far more detail. Jim101 (talk) 22:33, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Categories:
- All unassessed articles
- Unassessed Korea-related articles
- Unknown-importance Korea-related articles
- Korean military history task force articles
- WikiProject Korea articles
- Unassessed China-related articles
- Unknown-importance China-related articles
- Unassessed China-related articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- Unassessed Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- Unassessed Chinese military history articles
- Chinese military history task force articles
- Unassessed European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- Unassessed French military history articles
- French military history task force articles
- Unassessed Korean military history articles
- Unassessed North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- Unassessed United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles