Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Joseph (Geoshrad): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
JohnnyB256 (talk | contribs)
MacGyverMagic (talk | contribs)
Line 6: Line 6:
the reference for "award winning" is the guy's own website [[User:Polarpanda|Polarpanda]] ([[User talk:Polarpanda|talk]]) 14:03, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
the reference for "award winning" is the guy's own website [[User:Polarpanda|Polarpanda]] ([[User talk:Polarpanda|talk]]) 14:03, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', can see nothing notable. Even if "award winning" is true it surely should matter what type of award that is, and who else has noticed it. Also COI. <small>Please, Polarpanda, use a [[WP:Twinkle|tool]] to populate AfD. This way the AfD day log stays intact ;)</small> --[[User:Pgallert|Pgallert]] ([[User talk:Pgallert|talk]]) 14:39, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', can see nothing notable. Even if "award winning" is true it surely should matter what type of award that is, and who else has noticed it. Also COI. <small>Please, Polarpanda, use a [[WP:Twinkle|tool]] to populate AfD. This way the AfD day log stays intact ;)</small> --[[User:Pgallert|Pgallert]] ([[User talk:Pgallert|talk]]) 14:39, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
::Is it just me, or doesn't the link actually show he's award-winning. I wasn't able to find the evidence, even on his own site. - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 10:50, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Insufficient evidence of notability.--[[User:JohnnyB256|JohnnyB256]] ([[User talk:JohnnyB256|talk]]) 17:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Insufficient evidence of notability.--[[User:JohnnyB256|JohnnyB256]] ([[User talk:JohnnyB256|talk]]) 17:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:50, 3 December 2009

George Joseph (Geoshrad) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

the reference for "award winning" is the guy's own website Polarpanda (talk) 14:03, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, can see nothing notable. Even if "award winning" is true it surely should matter what type of award that is, and who else has noticed it. Also COI. Please, Polarpanda, use a tool to populate AfD. This way the AfD day log stays intact ;) --Pgallert (talk) 14:39, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Is it just me, or doesn't the link actually show he's award-winning. I wasn't able to find the evidence, even on his own site. - Mgm|(talk) 10:50, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]