Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Joseph (Geoshrad): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 202.144.134.242 - "→George Joseph (Geoshrad): " |
→George Joseph (Geoshrad): Comment |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*'''Delete'''. Insufficient evidence of notability.--[[User:JohnnyB256|JohnnyB256]] ([[User talk:JohnnyB256|talk]]) 17:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. Insufficient evidence of notability.--[[User:JohnnyB256|JohnnyB256]] ([[User talk:JohnnyB256|talk]]) 17:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC) |
||
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Photography|list of Photography-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small><small>—[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 05:55, 4 December 2009 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Photography|list of Photography-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small><small>—[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 05:55, 4 December 2009 (UTC)</small> |
||
*''' |
*'''Wait''' Data is being Added up <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/202.144.134.242|202.144.134.242]] ([[User talk:202.144.134.242|talk]]) 15:20, 4 December 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
*:'''Comment:''' Very well but these are not reliable sources (except NatGeo), and coverage is ''from'' Geoshrad, not ''about'' him. If National Geographic brings an article on Geoshrad, that would change things for me. --[[User:Pgallert|Pgallert]] ([[User talk:Pgallert|talk]]) 09:05, 7 December 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 09:05, 7 December 2009
- George Joseph (Geoshrad) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
the reference for "award winning" is the guy's own website Polarpanda (talk) 14:03, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete, can see nothing notable. Even if "award winning" is true it surely should matter what type of award that is, and who else has noticed it. Also COI. Please, Polarpanda, use a tool to populate AfD. This way the AfD day log stays intact ;) --Pgallert (talk) 14:39, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- Is it just me, or doesn't the link actually show he's award-winning. I wasn't able to find the evidence, even on his own site. - Mgm|(talk) 10:50, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Insufficient evidence of notability.--JohnnyB256 (talk) 17:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:55, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Wait Data is being Added up —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.144.134.242 (talk) 15:20, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Comment: Very well but these are not reliable sources (except NatGeo), and coverage is from Geoshrad, not about him. If National Geographic brings an article on Geoshrad, that would change things for me. --Pgallert (talk) 09:05, 7 December 2009 (UTC)