Talk:Frederick Buechner: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:19, 8 December 2009

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

To start a peer review, choose an appropriate topic from the list below and click on the link to create the review page.

Arts	Language and literature
Philosophy and religion	Everyday life
Social sciences and society	Geography
History	Engineering and technology
Natural sciences and mathematics	General topic or List

If you have already done this, and the template has not changed, try purging this talk page.

Peer Review of Frederick Buechner

I've done a lot of work on this one and addressed the suggestions from Carcharoth - I'd love to get a peer review/outside perspective. Thank you!!

Copied from User talk:Carcharoth 14:04, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you interested in reviewing an article on novelist/theologian Frederick Buechner. I am a fan and it seems that some professionals have helped write the article, but I wanted to help get it to FA level... what do you think the article needs next?

Thanks,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Buechner —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.24.22.54 (talk) 04:18, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lead looks good. "The Buechner Institute at King College" section is stubby. The external links section needs formatting. Quotes section looks the wrong approach for that sort of thing. I've reassessed as C-class, and I think if you ask for a proper review, you can get this assessed as B-class, or GA-class. FA-class needs a bit more work. I would try a formal request for peer review and keeping asking around. Copying this to the article talk page. Carcharoth (talk) 14:04, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 == Peer Review of Frederick Buechner ==
+I've done a lot of work on this one and addressed the suggestions from Carcharoth - I'd love to get a peer review/outside perspective. Thank you!!
 :<small>Copied from [[User talk:Carcharoth]] 14:04, 20 October 2009 (UTC)</small>