Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ophélie Bretnacher

Ophélie Bretnacher

Ophélie Bretnacher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Single event only. Subject is not notable apart from her death, article is a more of a crime report than a biography. Off2riorob (talk) 18:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, BLP1E, NOTNEWS etc ukexpat (talk) 18:42, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
• Delete, the subject is known for only one event, namely her disappearance. Although the death of a young person is sad, there is no viable reason to have a stand-alone wikipedia article on this individual. Jezebel'sPonyo^shhh 18:47, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Subject fails wikipedia notability guidelines. Thousands of people vanish, and turn up dead a year, and nothing seems to mark this one as special. Also WP:NOT#NEWS Martin451 (talk) 18:52, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
• Delete: Per WP:BLP1E. Joe Chill (talk) 20:03, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. -- Martin451 (talk) 22:47, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. -- Martin451 (talk) 22:48, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- Martin451 (talk) 22:49, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
• BLP1E?? Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 01:03, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
  • There is nothing else to use and being dead doesn't mean an automatic article. Joe Chill (talk) 01:12, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
    • If there's nothing else to use (and I'm not agreeing with the specific claim), then you don't have an argument for deletion, because "living" is an essential element of the policy you're citing. I think you should review the range of potentially applicable policies and guidelines more carefully. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:01, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
      • There is WP:BIO1E which I linked to in my delete comment above - it covers all biographies. --Jezebel'sPonyo^shhh 02:10, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
      • Even if there wasn't anything that covered it, which I just found out that there is, it wouldn't matter. That's a dumb response because it's such a minor detail. Joe Chill (talk) 02:16, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Delete, although a person can be here for one event ( Jon Benet Ramsey, imho no where even close on this article. } this seems to be more of a memorial page then anything else. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 04:31, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Raymond Nivet's answer :

Ladies and gentlemen of Wikipedia,

This article Bretnacher Ophelia is in no way an Article "in memory of someone." It is an article on the Case Bretnacher Ophelia "is a state affair, a case on human rights and democracy in Europe, the establishment of a Europe not only financial and mafia, but a Europe Police and judicial cooperation that respects its own treaties. But you do not overlook as you read this article, is not it, that the police verdict of suicide, while all the evidence that exists s 'acts of murder? And reading it, you understand that there is a willingness of the 2 countries to stifle the matter, which is a diplomatic time bomb. What is interesting is all violations in a year, all the directives for cooperation of States, and this one purpose, which no longer speaks of Ophelia Bretnacher. We still have to talk to her, because if this case has such a price scale media is that this young girl with undeniable charisma, had so many friends, they have organized an unprecedented media and demonstration of several thousand people under the Eiffel Tower (see the film AFP: Agence France Presse) for involvement of the French state. Event that has been heard since President Sarkozy has decided to intervene. Currently a number of complaints are being made for non-compliance of Democracy

I thought you were primarily an encyclopedia, independent living, loving and college collective knowledge, freedom and truth, and I hope that you are "free" and that this is not your share a commitment to censorship, and you do not suffer from pressure within the "reason of state" because I am in this very sensitive case and I shall not fail to bring the action media and judiciary, which could possibly prevail in this case ...

For the moment, I realized that rather you did not know this case was not yet come to your ears and I will explain and your deletion.

However, if you look on the different search engines:

Ophelia Bretnacher Google: 307 000 Articles Ophelia Bretnacher Photos: 67 700 ... etc.

I hope that you will be susceptible to my arguments, and especially, especially, you're not motivated by a desire for censorship, a matter that transcends us all.

With my best regards

Raymondnivet (talk) 12:18, 9 December 2009 (UTC)