Talk:Association of Surgeons in Training: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
The article seems to be worded as an advertisement of the ASiT, and needs revision. |
The article seems to be worded as an advertisement of the ASiT, and needs revision. |
||
[[User:Traya101|Traya101]] ([[User talk:Traya101|talk]]) 13:37, 11 November 2009 (UTC) |
[[User:Traya101|Traya101]] ([[User talk:Traya101|talk]]) 13:37, 11 November 2009 (UTC) |
||
*It might come across that way, but it isn't intended to. After all, this is merely a charitable organisation intent on promoting excellence in surgical trianing in the United Kingdom. There is no ulterior motive. [[User:Jfbcubed|Jfbcubed]] ([[User talk:Jfbcubed|talk]]) 23:03, 9 December 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:03, 9 December 2009
Medicine Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Unreferenced?
I'm slightly confused regarding the assertion that the source is unreferenced - the link is given on the page to the website from which the information is derived. Beyond that, and my personal knowledge (as I am currently the Treasurer of ASiT), I'm not sure what references are sought.
Further advice would be gratefully received.
Jfbcubed 19:32, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Royal Colleges
I have slightly amended the wording and specified which Royal Colleges I am referring to, in response to a "dn" tag. Jfbcubed 22:34, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Advertisment
The article seems to be worded as an advertisement of the ASiT, and needs revision. Traya101 (talk) 13:37, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- It might come across that way, but it isn't intended to. After all, this is merely a charitable organisation intent on promoting excellence in surgical trianing in the United Kingdom. There is no ulterior motive. Jfbcubed (talk) 23:03, 9 December 2009 (UTC)