Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ophélie Bretnacher: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 25: Line 25:
:*'''Comment'''- I'd also like to point out that accusations of censorship tend to ring exceptionally hollow with editors here, and in no way help your case. This article does not meet the criteria for inclusion. These criteria MAKE us an encyclopedia- if it's not notable, it's not covered. --[[User talk:Kingoomieiii|<span style="text-shadow:#BBBBBB 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">King Öomie</span>]] 19:18, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
:*'''Comment'''- I'd also like to point out that accusations of censorship tend to ring exceptionally hollow with editors here, and in no way help your case. This article does not meet the criteria for inclusion. These criteria MAKE us an encyclopedia- if it's not notable, it's not covered. --[[User talk:Kingoomieiii|<span style="text-shadow:#BBBBBB 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">King Öomie</span>]] 19:18, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
I do not agree with the deletion.
I do not agree with the deletion.
The case Bretnacher Ophelia is a state affair [[User:Raymondnivet|Raymondnivet]] ([[User talk:Raymondnivet|talk]]) 01:07, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
The case Bretnacher Ophelia is a state affair Ophelia Bretnacher Google: 307 000 Articles Ophelia Bretnacher Photos: 67 700 ... etc.[[User:Raymondnivet|Raymondnivet]] ([[User talk:Raymondnivet|talk]]) 01:07, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:10, 10 December 2009

Ophélie Bretnacher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Single event only. Subject is not notable apart from her death, article is a more of a crime report than a biography. Off2riorob (talk) 18:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, although a person can be here for one event ( Jon Benet Ramsey, imho no where even close on this article. } this seems to be more of a memorial page then anything else. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 04:31, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not agree with the deletion.Ophelia Bretnacher Google: 307 000 Articles Ophelia Bretnacher Photos: 67 700 ... etc.

Actually, I just removed it. The section headers were screwing things up on the log page. Besides, as you just said, it's visible in the page history.
V = I * R (talk to Ω) 18:35, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I left a warning about the "ownership" issues seen above. I also tried explaining that the article neded to be cleaned up. It was all over the place and wasn't not NPOV. Kinda confusing how the model was connected other then she went missing too....Hell In A Bucket (talk) 18:38, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've collapsed the rest of the statement by this user. It is extremely long, and not properly formatted. --King Öomie 19:02, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment- I'd also like to point out that accusations of censorship tend to ring exceptionally hollow with editors here, and in no way help your case. This article does not meet the criteria for inclusion. These criteria MAKE us an encyclopedia- if it's not notable, it's not covered. --King Öomie 19:18, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not agree with the deletion. The case Bretnacher Ophelia is a state affair Ophelia Bretnacher Google: 307 000 Articles Ophelia Bretnacher Photos: 67 700 ... etc.Raymondnivet (talk) 01:07, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]