Jump to content

User talk:Alice Mudgarden: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
December 2009: decline, the retraction has to be clear and unambiguous. I believe there's an attempt at retraction but it has to be a bit clearer...
RV. A fucking IP address cannot decide who to block or unblock. Get real. Jesus.
Line 2: Line 2:
<div class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left]] You have been '''indefinitely [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for making [[Wikipedia:No legal threats|legal threats or taking legal action]]. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia as long as the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you believe that a legal action is warranted, you may contact our information team at '''{{NoSpamEmail|info-en|wikimedia.org}}''' and they may forward it to our legal counsel or a more appropriate venue. If you believe this block is unjustified you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:Shell_Kinney|Shell]] <sup>[[User_talk:Shell_Kinney|babelfish]]</sup> 09:58, 10 December 2009 (UTC)</div>{{z7}}<!-- Template:uw-lblock -->
<div class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left]] You have been '''indefinitely [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for making [[Wikipedia:No legal threats|legal threats or taking legal action]]. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia as long as the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you believe that a legal action is warranted, you may contact our information team at '''{{NoSpamEmail|info-en|wikimedia.org}}''' and they may forward it to our legal counsel or a more appropriate venue. If you believe this block is unjustified you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:Shell_Kinney|Shell]] <sup>[[User_talk:Shell_Kinney|babelfish]]</sup> 09:58, 10 December 2009 (UTC)</div>{{z7}}<!-- Template:uw-lblock -->


{{unblock reviewed|1=Although what I said about 2007 ''is true'', and '''I stand by my view''' that these users have very clearly made an error and are purely seeking to harass me as they clearly cannot fathom the possibility that they have made an error, those "threats" were just heat of the moment ramblings; hot air expelling.
{{unblock|Although what I said about 2007 ''is true'', and '''I stand by my view''' that these users have very clearly made an error and are purely seeking to harass me as they clearly cannot fathom the possibility that they have made an error, those "threats" were just heat of the moment ramblings; hot air expelling.


The 2007 incident was very ugly, and distressing, and there's no way I'd go through all of that again just to get a fucking apology.
The 2007 incident was very ugly, and distressing, and there's no way I'd go through all of that again just to get a fucking apology.


But I am still upset at these ridiculous, malicious and clearly fallacious accusations those users have made.}}
But I am still upset at these ridiculous, malicious and clearly fallacious accusations those users have made.|decline=To negate the [[Wikipedia:No legal threats]] block you have to clearly and unambiguously disavow the threat that was made, not just say "it was just heat of the moment; hot air expelling". I believe you're attempting to do so in good faith, but it needs to be more clear than that per our policy. As soon as you do so this should be able to be lifted. Thank you. [[Special:Contributions/64.142.103.143|64.142.103.143]] ([[User talk:64.142.103.143|talk]]) 11:23, 10 December 2009 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 11:24, 10 December 2009

December 2009

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia as long as the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you believe that a legal action is warranted, you may contact our information team at info-en@wikimedia.org and they may forward it to our legal counsel or a more appropriate venue. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Shell babelfish 09:58, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Z7

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Alice Mudgarden (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Although what I said about 2007 is true, and I stand by my view that these users have very clearly made an error and are purely seeking to harass me as they clearly cannot fathom the possibility that they have made an error, those "threats" were just heat of the moment ramblings; hot air expelling.

The 2007 incident was very ugly, and distressing, and there's no way I'd go through all of that again just to get a fucking apology.

But I am still upset at these ridiculous, malicious and clearly fallacious accusations those users have made.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Although what I said about 2007 ''is true'', and '''I stand by my view''' that these users have very clearly made an error and are purely seeking to harass me as they clearly cannot fathom the possibility that they have made an error, those "threats" were just heat of the moment ramblings; hot air expelling. The 2007 incident was very ugly, and distressing, and there's no way I'd go through all of that again just to get a fucking apology. But I am still upset at these ridiculous, malicious and clearly fallacious accusations those users have made. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Although what I said about 2007 ''is true'', and '''I stand by my view''' that these users have very clearly made an error and are purely seeking to harass me as they clearly cannot fathom the possibility that they have made an error, those "threats" were just heat of the moment ramblings; hot air expelling. The 2007 incident was very ugly, and distressing, and there's no way I'd go through all of that again just to get a fucking apology. But I am still upset at these ridiculous, malicious and clearly fallacious accusations those users have made. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Although what I said about 2007 ''is true'', and '''I stand by my view''' that these users have very clearly made an error and are purely seeking to harass me as they clearly cannot fathom the possibility that they have made an error, those "threats" were just heat of the moment ramblings; hot air expelling. The 2007 incident was very ugly, and distressing, and there's no way I'd go through all of that again just to get a fucking apology. But I am still upset at these ridiculous, malicious and clearly fallacious accusations those users have made. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}