User talk:Josh Tumath: Difference between revisions
→Firefox 3.7 won't support PDF natively as far as I can tell: any more mentions? |
Josh Tumath (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
:Ok, I ''will'' watch your talk page. :-) ([http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASkalman&action=historysubmit&diff=331158834&oldid=208498815]) |
:Ok, I ''will'' watch your talk page. :-) ([http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASkalman&action=historysubmit&diff=331158834&oldid=208498815]) |
||
:Are you really sure? So Firebug will become part of Firefox? Furthermore I can't find any mentions or blog posts about it at all. Can you? [[User:Skalman|Skalman]] ([[User talk:Skalman|talk]]) 01:07, 12 December 2009 (UTC) |
:Are you really sure? So Firebug will become part of Firefox? Furthermore I can't find any mentions or blog posts about it at all. Can you? [[User:Skalman|Skalman]] ([[User talk:Skalman|talk]]) 01:07, 12 December 2009 (UTC) |
||
:I see. We'll remove it for now and see if it's announced in the future. |
Revision as of 10:07, 12 December 2009
This is Josh Tumath's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2 |
|
||
Template:Ace Attorney
Okay, so let's see - your argument is "Okay, only two templates on Wikipedia add unnecessary information that's the most base form of trivia, so I can too!". Are you going to explain why the the release date is the one, only piece of information that can be listed? If you plan to include release dates, I plan to include platforms.
And do you ever plan to explain why we need a second column for a single game? Because you absolutely have not done this at any point. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 20:10, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (File:Ace Attorney Investigations- Miles Edgeworth logo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Ace Attorney Investigations- Miles Edgeworth logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 09:13, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Addition of prose tag
The Features removed from Windows Vista and Features removed in Windows 7 artiles are exactly the kind of articles for which there should be no prose tag as the individual features are completely unrelated and mentioning them together in a para in prose form would make no sense. Prose form is useful for articles that have content which can be aggregated together. The current bulleted list style is perfect for such articles where each point is unrelated to the other.
Wikipedia guidelines clearly state "Use this (prose) tag where a list needs cleanup. Whereas these lists do not require cleanup as each point is well-cited with references. - xpclient Talk 06:59, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Firefox 3.7 won't support PDF natively as far as I can tell
[1] I can't find any source saying that Fx 3.7 will include native PDF support, and the corresponding bug on Bugzilla doesn't seem to have any activity. So I removed the mention of PDF support. If you have another opinion you're welcome to discuss it. I won't be watching your talk page, so if you want to say something to me, post on my talk page. Skalman (talk) 12:26, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, I will watch your talk page. :-) ([2])
- Are you really sure? So Firebug will become part of Firefox? Furthermore I can't find any mentions or blog posts about it at all. Can you? Skalman (talk) 01:07, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
- I see. We'll remove it for now and see if it's announced in the future.