User talk:66.57.96.198: Difference between revisions
Level 3 warning re. Icelanders (HG) |
npov4 |
||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please do not continue to violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]] policy, as you did with <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icelanders?diff=328477307 this edit]</span> to [[:Icelanders]]. If you continue to do so, you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. <!-- Template:uw-hugglenpov3 --> [[User:Alansohn|Alansohn]] ([[User talk:Alansohn|talk]]) 23:56, 28 November 2009 (UTC) |
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please do not continue to violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]] policy, as you did with <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icelanders?diff=328477307 this edit]</span> to [[:Icelanders]]. If you continue to do so, you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. <!-- Template:uw-hugglenpov3 --> [[User:Alansohn|Alansohn]] ([[User talk:Alansohn|talk]]) 23:56, 28 November 2009 (UTC) |
||
== December 2009 == |
|||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] This is the '''last warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article{{#if:Rebecca Diamond|, as you did to [[:Rebecca Diamond]]}}, you '''will''' be blocked from editing Wikipedia. {{#if:This "source" you quote is about a Jewish woman marrying a Gentile man named "Mike", so it clearly isn't about this case, but regardless, this is not the place to insert your analysis.|This "source" you quote is about a Jewish woman marrying a Gentile man named "Mike", so it clearly isn't about this case, but regardless, this is not the place to insert your analysis.|}}<!-- Template:uw-npov4 --> --[[User:Rogerd|rogerd]] ([[User talk:Rogerd|talk]]) 04:09, 13 December 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:09, 13 December 2009
September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Tina Gordon has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\byoutube\.com' (link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaimSG9y4C8) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image or a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:53, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
May 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Tina Gordon has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \byoutube\.com (links: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0iyu4xhgju). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 01:07, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Rebecca Diamond has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Nsaa (talk) 19:45, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
July 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to South Carolina, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. tedder (talk) 01:03, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Mifter (talk) 22:54, 4 July 2009 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Melissa Moore. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sarilox (talk) 15:30, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
August 2009
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to South Carolina. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. AlexiusHoratius 02:00, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Religion in Iceland has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 01:34, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Religion in Iceland. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. William Avery (talk) 10:57, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Religion in Iceland has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps Talk • Contribs 16:30, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Jonathan Bernis. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --GorillaWarfare talk 23:07, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
November 2009
Please see Talk:Rebecca Diamond. This article is about a person, not your opinions about Jewish intermarriage. --rogerd (talk) 15:47, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Rebecca Diamond. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.--rogerd (talk) 03:56, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Please do not continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Icelanders. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alansohn (talk) 23:56, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
December 2009
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Rebecca Diamond, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This "source" you quote is about a Jewish woman marrying a Gentile man named "Mike", so it clearly isn't about this case, but regardless, this is not the place to insert your analysis. --rogerd (talk) 04:09, 13 December 2009 (UTC)