Jump to content

Talk:Erling Folkvord: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Meco (talk | contribs)
Line 20: Line 20:
::Working on it. --[[User:Trust Is All You Need|TIAYN]] ([[User talk:Trust Is All You Need|talk]]) 14:55, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
::Working on it. --[[User:Trust Is All You Need|TIAYN]] ([[User talk:Trust Is All You Need|talk]]) 14:55, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
:{{Done}} --[[User:Trust Is All You Need|TIAYN]] ([[User talk:Trust Is All You Need|talk]]) 15:32, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
:{{Done}} --[[User:Trust Is All You Need|TIAYN]] ([[User talk:Trust Is All You Need|talk]]) 15:32, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

== Reorganizing needed ==

The decription of the 1983 local election in Oslo goes into minute details and perhaps even anecdotal information that is unnecessary. This should be pruned.

Also the Turkey incident should go into a separate section as it is lost where it currently is. Also, the mention of the photograph which was confiscated appears as somewhat digressive, and without further information I find it non-notable. __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 16:04, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:04, 13 December 2009

Contradictory info on parliamentary work

"He was a member of the Standing Committee on Finance in 1992, a Member of Parliament from 1993-1997". The standing committee is a part of the parliament, so he would have to have been a parliamentarian also at that point. I notice that also the Norwegian Bokmål Wikipedia presents this contradiction. It should be cleard up. __meco (talk) 23:35, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --TIAYN (talk) 16:28, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Now, should we really have details about which parliamentary committees he was a member of in the lead? __meco (talk) 20:45, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Working on it. --TIAYN (talk) 14:55, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done --TIAYN (talk) 15:32, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reorganizing needed

The decription of the 1983 local election in Oslo goes into minute details and perhaps even anecdotal information that is unnecessary. This should be pruned.

Also the Turkey incident should go into a separate section as it is lost where it currently is. Also, the mention of the photograph which was confiscated appears as somewhat digressive, and without further information I find it non-notable. __meco (talk) 16:04, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]