Jump to content

Talk:Protected area: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Doncram (talk | contribs)
Protected Areas vs. protected areas: repeat pointer to discussion location
Line 113: Line 113:


* You have no support anywhere for your changes. Simply you yourself repeating what say and other editors disagreeing with you does not justify any of our edits. IUCN does not own the term 'protected areas', which is a common enough English phrase of known and obvious meaning, not including silly statements. [[User:Hmains|Hmains]] ([[User talk:Hmains|talk]]) 01:23, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
* You have no support anywhere for your changes. Simply you yourself repeating what say and other editors disagreeing with you does not justify any of our edits. IUCN does not own the term 'protected areas', which is a common enough English phrase of known and obvious meaning, not including silly statements. [[User:Hmains|Hmains]] ([[User talk:Hmains|talk]]) 01:23, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

::Umm, you're simply repeating yourself. No it is not obvious what a Wikipedia article on "Protected areas" should cover. Discussing at [[wt:PAREAS]]. This note here is to point others to the discussion at [[wt:PAREAS]]. [[User:Doncram|doncram]] ([[User talk:Doncram|talk]]) 02:10, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:10, 14 December 2009

WikiProject iconProtected areas Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Renaming

I have found the following list in the National park article. They are probably candidates for redirecting/renaming "Protected areas of [country]", as I already did with Australia. That way they are more inclusive and areas other than national parks can be included (see Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected Areas).

Guy 19:33 Oct 7, 2002 (UTC)

  • I disagree. National parks are a special type of protected area that should be listed separately as they are significant areas of national and even world heritage importance -- kiwiinapanic 12:09 19 Jul 2003 (UTC)

Freshwater protected areas

Although protected area networks have been developed in terrestrial and marine environments, the concept is not well developed for freshwater environments. Few scientific papers are referenced through this phrase, and national freshwater protected area programs are under-developed in all nations. Sites protected through the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands 1971 form the largest network of freshwater protected areas worldwide (www.ramsar.org) but rivers and underground freshwater ecosystems are under-represented in this system.

Please create more "Wildlife of ....." articles for all countries.

.... and kindly contribute to these new articles when you get time, and request others too.

See Wildlife of India for reference.

Thanks

Atulsnischal 18:13, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you are interested in Environment, Wildlife, Conservation and Nature etc. please join in to contribute, even starting off with making new stub class articles will be a great contribution.

Sincerely

Atulsnischal 16:36, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We need senior administrators or people who are long in Wikipedia to help us with the templates and for other further helps. Details can be seen in its talk page. IT's urgent. We want this wkiproject to be added to the exsisting WP:IND banner. Amartyabag TALK2ME 05:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Statistics

I think it would be nice to add a table with total size of protected areas per country, both in km² and % of countries' area. for example:

Australia | 895 280 km² | 11.5% (http://www.environment.gov.au/parks/nrs/science/locations.html)

Nicaragua | 22 421 km² | 17.3% (http://www.marena.gob.ni/areas_protegidas/estructura.htm)

If we could add columns for the different IUCN categories, it would be even better, but the data is quite hard to get. Australia's department of the environment's website is really good for that. But most countries don't provide as much detail.AtikuX (talk) 07:31, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

here's a start... Elekhh (talk) 05:35, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Country Total terrestrial protected areas notes
Nr. Area (km²) %
Afghanistan Afganistan 7 1,079 0.2%
Albania Albania 80 2,994 8.0%
Algeria Algeria 23 119,622 5.0%
American Samoa American Samoa 4 34 16.8%
Andorra Andorra 2 32 6.9%
Angola Angola 15 103,060 8.3%
Argentina Argentina 307 180,286 6.5%
Armenia Armenia 10 2,440 8.2%
Australia Australia 5,485 790,134 10.3%
Austria Austria 1,087 23,475 28.0%
Azerbaijan Azerbaijan 42 6,327 7.3%
The Bahamas Bahamas 43 1,549 11.4%
Bahrain Bahrain 4 58 8.4%
Bangladesh Bangladesh 20 3,140 2.2%

Reference: World Database on Protected Areas: Summary of protection by Country and Territory on the 31st January 2008, retrieved 2009-09-30


Protected areas title changes

Protected Areas vs. protected areas

There's some discussion at wt:PAREAS about definition of the term protected areas. I wonder if the use of the term in Wikipedia should be brought back to being about Protected Areas defined and listed by the IUCN only. This protected areas article used capitalized Protected Areas from its origination in 2002 until this Nov 2004 edit. doncram (talk) 01:24, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • You have no support anywhere for your changes. Simply you yourself repeating what say and other editors disagreeing with you does not justify any of our edits. IUCN does not own the term 'protected areas', which is a common enough English phrase of known and obvious meaning, not including silly statements. Hmains (talk) 01:23, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Umm, you're simply repeating yourself. No it is not obvious what a Wikipedia article on "Protected areas" should cover. Discussing at wt:PAREAS. This note here is to point others to the discussion at wt:PAREAS. doncram (talk) 02:10, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]